The Gift of Chess

Notice to commercial publishers seeking use of images from this collection of chess-related archive blogs. For use of the many large color restorations, two conditions must be met: 1) It is YOUR responsibility to obtain written permissions for use from the current holders of rights over the original b/w photo. Then, 2) make a tax-deductible donation to The Gift of Chess in honor of Robert J. Fischer-Newspaper Archives. A donation in the amount of $250 USD or greater is requested for images above 2000 pixels and other special request items. For small images, such as for fair use on personal blogs, all credits must remain intact and a donation is still requested but negotiable. Please direct any photographs for restoration and special request (for best results, scanned and submitted at their highest possible resolution), including any additional questions to S. Mooney, at bobbynewspaperblogs•gmail. As highlighted in the ABC News feature, chess has numerous benefits for individuals, including enhancing critical thinking and problem-solving skills, improving concentration and memory, and promoting social interaction and community building. Initiatives like The Gift of Chess have the potential to bring these benefits to a wider audience, particularly in areas where access to educational and recreational resources is limited.

Best of Chess Fischer Newspaper Archives
• Robert J. Fischer, 1955 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1956 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1957 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1958 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1959 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1960 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1961 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1962 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1963 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1964 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1965 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1966 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1967 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1968 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1969 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1970 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1971 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1972 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1973 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1974 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1975 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1976 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1977 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1978 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1979 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1980 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1981 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1982 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1983 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1984 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1985 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1986 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1987 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1988 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1989 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1990 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1991 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1992 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1993 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1994 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1995 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1996 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1997 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1998 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1999 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 2000 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 2001 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 2002 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 2003 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 2004 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 2005 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 2006 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 2007 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 2008 ➦
Chess Columns Additional Archives/Social Media

July 14, 1972 The Signal, Chess by George Koltanowski, Santa Clarita, California

< Prev Index Next >

Chess by George Koltanowski
First Game in Iceland
We abandon our regular series today to bring an account of the first game at Reykjavik, as reported by the UPI correspondents Milton Richman and Ian Westergren, along with the play of the first game Tuesday and Wednesday.
Word had filtered down that Fischer was “go, go, go” for that first match with Boris Spassky, Russia's world champion.
All the embroidery had been taken care of. The drapes, the TV cameras ([that is certainly untrue, as Col. Edmondson, who had a hand in drafting the agreement, reiterated, “Fischer had the right, however, to bar the cameras if he felt they were disturbing his concentration.” and Paul Marshall, the lawyer to Robert J. Fischer stated in regard to those crews of men operating cameras, “Bobby told me, ‘I can't think, it's a distraction.’”]), the lights, the chess board, all the things Fischer, ([and even the Icelandic officials and Soviet delegates themselves reportedly]) had kicked about.
Spassky was all set.
Everyone in the Reykjavik Chess Hall was holding his breath as the Russian, playing the white pieces, made the first move, opening with the Queen pawn.
The world championship officially was on.
But something was missing.
Fischer.
He wasn't there.
([And why was Fischer late? After all, with the promise of official Icelandic police protection, how could that possibly be? Well according to a report from the UPI on July 12, 1972, “The first game started with Fischer being late eight minutes because he had been delayed by traffic.” Yeah, something like that. It was the responsibility of police to verify traffic conditions, but Iceland was more than content to fail in its duties and throwing up obstacles every opportunity.])
He [Fischer] wasn't there. He had an hour to make the first move. Fischer didn't set out to keep Spassky waiting. He didn't do it purposely. The officials clock was ticking but he … ([was unfairly delayed due to failure of police to clear traffic as they were under obligation to do, but Icelandic officials, “didn't care” about keeping their word to the Americans]).
([Snipping a lot of regurgitated rehash of Soviet propaganda which has recently flooded into American media from behind the pleats of the Iron Curtain. The motive behind the selection of the ultra-racist Iceland as the Soviet prime pick to host this venue, besides the glaring lack of modern satellite communications in Moscow's hope to bury coverage was that Iceland has a notoriously hostile in its Anti-American atmosphere, presumably the perfect choice to effectively implement the Soviet's brazen effort to break the morale of the American team and knock the challenger's wind out of him, before the match has a chance to begin.])
Finally, after eight minutes, during which time Spassky got up impatiently and walked around, Fischer appeared.
He shook hands with Spassky and then sat down in his special swivel chair which he had flown in from New York for these championships.
Fischer studied the board two minutes, then made his first move, knight to King bishop three.
In his own mind, Fischer feels he's one little guy taking on the whole Russian government. He doesn't feel this way because of any politics, the usual politics between countries, that is, but because of chess politics.
Regardless, he always plays to win.
Tuesday's first game was adjourned, meaning each man had made his allotted 40 moves in the five-hour time limit with no decision being reached.

Conservative Play
In this first of 24 games, Spassky played the way everybody thought he would—conservatively. That figured because if this whole business winds up even, say 12-12, Spassky goes back to Russia the same way he came to Reykjavik — world champion.
Spassky asked for adjournment after 40 moves and 4 ½ hours play.
When the two resumed the game at 5 p.m. Wednesday — the first in their $250,000, 24-game world match — Spassky has a bishop and three pawns against Fischer's five pawns.
But nobody came up with an explanation why the American chess genius went straight into what appeared to be a Russian trap. ([Actually, that is patently false. Robert Fischer proposed the obvious, that some officials in the Chess World seem to be conspiring together in neatly brushing under the rug. As Col. Edmondson, who had a hand in drafting the agreement, reiterated, “Fischer had the right to bar the cameras if he felt they were disturbing his concentration.” and Paul Marshall, the lawyer to Robert J. Fischer stated in regard to those crews of men, some in crews up to three men, located no farther than 15 feet away, in full view of Mr. Fischer, operating cameras, “Bobby told me, ‘I can't think, it's a distraction.’” and Harry Golombek reports, on July 13, 1972, “…a dramatic suspension of play. Fischer observed that a cameraman was training a camera on him from the roof. He protested and said he would not resume play until the camera was removed. For 32 minutes the game stood in abeyance, and in the interim. Fischer's clock was going. However, he had plenty of time. Fred Kramer, vice-president of the American Zone of the World Chess Federation, called in the police and the cameraman was ordered away.” while Schonberg on July 13, 1972 clearly presumes the culprit is yet another disruptive camera crew, located in a different are of the sports arena, “…Fischer objected to a television crew working from an aperture at the side of the stage. He said that the movements of one of the cameramen distracted him, and he stalked off the stage. Fischer's clock was on during his absence and when he finally returned to the chess board, he was left with 25 minutes to make 16 moves. Officials of the Icelandic Chess Federation and members of the Fischer delegation rushed backstage when Fischer made his objection, and pressure was brought on the cameramen to leave.” Fischer himself attests to perceiving himself swarmed with crews of camera men, stating for the record, “instead of..video tape film that didn't make any noise they just had guys with film cameras that were..all around.. making a racket. A nuisance. Too much noise, and visually you could see them moving around.” The excuse the Icelandic and Soviet officials gave, in refusal to comply with, and brazenly break the rules, according to an AP report on July 14, 1972: “Iceland promised that he would not know there was filming taking place, so he could concentrate. In two inspections prior to the match, he was not shown the television equipment.” And in spite of the reported July 14, 1972 report by Harold Schonberg, that “At 11:58 P.M., two minutes before the deadline for filing a protest, Fischer's aide, Fred Cramer, handed a formal written protest to Schmid. Cramer said Fischer had not seen the note.” So a formal written protest was indeed submitted, and before the deadline expired, but according to Isaac Kashdan, who was under the wrong impression that, “Under agreed rules of the match, he ([Fischer]) had the right to object and to demand removal of the cameras if they disturbed him. But such a protest must be made formally and in writing to the tournament director or to a special appeals committee formed for the match. No protest, formal or otherwise was made in writing and after world champion Boris Spassky appeared on time and waited the required hour for the challenger to appear, referee Lothar Schmid declared the game forfeit. Later, however, officials of the International Chess Federation said they had discovered that Fischer was not aware that the protest had to be made in writing and had assumed his oral protest would be sufficient.” Yet, it is in fact documented above, by NY Times, Harold Schonberg, that Fred Cramer submitted the written formal request by 11:58 P.M. “two minutes before the deadline expired,” so the formal protest was filed within the deadline. But Soviet and Icelandic officials chose to simply disregard and bend the rules in favor of the Soviet Union, and awarded Spassky the forfeiture point, anyway.])
“He took a chance to win a chance,” said Danish grandmaster Jens Enevoldsen ([who once again, attempts to obfuscate the real matter of several disruptive crews of camera men, operating in full view of Fischer, put there to blow Fischer's concentration and throw points in favor of the Soviet delegation.])
“We will never know until Fischer tells us—if he does,” said another international grandmaster. ([A Soviet no doubt, and there's no need to drag Fischer up from the grave when the blunt answer was already provided above from contemporaries]). Fischer obviously was displeased with his game. ([Naturally, because of Soviet cheating.]) After the adjournment he angrily demanded a meeting with the Icelandic organizers to complain against what he described as the noisy audience ([oh please! We know already that such Soviet obfuscations were alleged no doubt. Yes, yes, “perhaps it was due to the drapes or the size of the chess pieces” to cover up the fact Fischer's complaints were directed against the rule-bending crews of camera men, strategically encircling Fischer, and forced upon Fischer in a calculated effort to blow his concentration. Again, see contemporary reports, above.]) Some 3000 Icelanders and foreign chess enthusiasts has packed into the Lagardur Hall for the opening thriller. But most knowledgeable observers said they felt the audience was more quiet than is normal at top chess games. ([That's because Fischer's complaint was directed at disruptive camera crews, some in packs of three, 15 feet away from Fischer, making a lot of noise to disrupt Fischer and inhibiting the challenger from properly formulating his strategy.])
The Icelanders rejected Fischer's demand and told him it is up to the official referee, Lothar Schmid of West Germany, to run the game from now on.
Fischer interrupted the second day's play by walking off the stage in irritation after the first three moves, then returned to resign on the 56th move.

ChessChess 14 Jul 1972, Fri The Signal (Santa Clarita, California) Newspapers.com

Yes… yes, the reports confirm the Soviet/Icelandic officials and delegates CHEATED. Cramer delivered the formal “protest” as required, in writing by 11:58 “two minutes before” the deadline expired. But the Soviets pretended it wasn't done by Fischer's team… simply ignored it, out of hand, to award Spassky the point.

“…The excuse the Icelandic and Soviet officials gave, in refusal to comply with, and brazenly break the rules, according to an AP report on July 14, 1972: “Iceland promised that he would not know there was filming taking place, so he could concentrate. In two inspections prior to the match, he was not shown the television equipment.”
And in spite of the reported July 14, 1972 report by Harold Schonberg, that “At 11:58 P.M., two minutes before the deadline for filing a protest, Fischer's aide, Fred Cramer, handed a formal written protest to Schmid. Cramer said Fischer had not seen the note.” So a formal written protest was indeed submitted, and before the deadline expired, but according to Isaac Kashdan, who was under the wrong impression that, “Under agreed rules of the match, he ([Fischer]) had the right to object and to demand removal of the cameras if they disturbed him. But such a protest must be made formally and in writing to the tournament director or to a special appeals committee formed for the match. No protest, formal or otherwise was made in writing and after world champion Boris Spassky appeared on time and waited the required hour for the challenger to appear, referee Lothar Schmid declared the game forfeit. Later, however, officials of the International Chess Federation said they had discovered that Fischer was not aware that the protest had to be made in writing and had assumed his oral protest would be sufficient.”
Yet, it is in fact documented above, by NY Times, Harold Schonberg, that Fred Cramer submitted the written formal request by 11:58 P.M. “two minutes before the deadline expired,” so the formal protest was filed within the deadline. But Soviet and Icelandic officials chose to simply disregard and bend the rules in favor of the Soviet Union, and awarded Spassky the forfeiture point, anyway.

The Snows of Moscow

How the Moscow snow, doth blow! Somebody had not informed GM Kashdan that the American delegation had indeed submitted a “formal written protest” two minutes before the deadline expired. Precisely 11:58 p.m. (See above). Therefore Fischer's protest was valid. The Soviets simply ignored it, and broke the rules, to award Spassky the point.

If justice had been done, and I have provided credible documented evidence, above from two experts in chess + PLUS Fischer's personal attorney, the official toll would declare “Fischer won the match 12½–7½, becoming the eleventh undisputed world champion”.

July 29, 1934 Los Angeles Times Chess by Herman Steiner

< Prev Index Next >

Chess by Herman SteinerChess by Herman Steiner 29 Jul 1934, Sun The Los Angeles Times (Los Angeles, California) Newspapers.com

L.A. Times Problem No. 483 Composed for the Los Angeles Times by H.L. Winings. White mates in two.
FEN rR3Bkr/qpPQ1pNb/pp1P1Pp1/3KpP2/8/8/8/8 w - - 0 1
Key: PxPe.p.

The following games are from the two matches given from the June 29, 1934 edition of the Los Angeles Times column, in New York City.

Match (1934), New York, rd 3, June 1934
Horowitz (White) vs. Fine (Black)

Descriptive
1. P-Q4 N-KB3
2. P-QB4 P-K3
3. N-QB3 P-Q4
4. N-B3 QN-Q2
5. P-K3 P-B3
6. B-Q3 PxP
7. BxBP P-QN4
8. B-Q3 P-QR3
9. P-QR4 P-N5
10. N-K4 P-B4
11. O-O B-N2
12. Q-Q2 P-QR4
13. B-N5 B-K2
14. PxP BxP
15. P-QN3 O-O
16. B-N2 Q-K2
17. R-B KR-Q
18. Q-K2 B-N3
19. N-B4 B-B2
20. N-Q4 QR-N
21. B-B6 B-R3
22. N-N5 BxN
23. PxB N-B4
24. Q-B2 N-Q6
25. QR-Q NxB
26. QxN N-Q4
27. R-R N-B6
28. NxP NxP
29. B-B3 BxN
30. RxB N-B6
31. KR-R P-N3
32. P-N3 Q-Q3
33. R-R7 R-Q2
34. QR-R6 Q-K2
35. RxR QxR
36. Q-R Q-Q7
37. R-R8 RxR
38. QxRch K-N2
39. Q-R6 P-K4
40. Q-B4 P-K5
41. BxP NxB
42. QxN Q-Q8ch
43. K-N2 1/2-1/2
Algebraic
1. d4 Nf6
2. c4 e6
3. Nc3 d5
4. Nf3 Nd7
5. e3 f6
6. Bd3 dxc4
7. Bxc4 b5
8. Bd3 a6
9. a4 b4
10. Ne4 c5
11. 0-0 Bb7
12. Qd2 a5
13. Bb5 Be7
14. dxc5 Bxc5
15. b3 0-0
16. Bb2 Qe7
17. Rc1 Rd8
18. Qe2 Bb6

Fine (White) vs. Horowitz (Black)
Match (1934), New York, rd 4, June 1934

Descriptive
1. P-Q4 N-KB3
2. P-QB4 P-K3
3. N-KB3 P-QN3
4. P-KN3 B-N2
5. B-N2 B-N5ch
6. QN-Q2 O-O
7. O-O BxN
8. QxB Q-K2
9. P-N3 P-Q3
10. B-N2 QN-Q2
11. N-R4 N-K5
12. Q-B2 P-KB4
13. QR-Q P-Q4
14. N-B3 P-QR4
15. PxP BxP
16. N-Q2 NxN
17. RxN BxB
18. KxB N-B3
19. Q-B6 QR-Q
20. R-B2 N-Q4
21. P-QR3 R-B3
22. R-K P-K4
23. Q-N7 P-K5
24. R(K)-QB R-B2
25. P-K3 Q-Q2
26. Q-B6 P-B5
27. QxQ P-B6ch
28. K-B R(Q)xQ
29. R-B6 R-B3
30. P-QR4 R(Q2)-Q3
31. RxR RxR
32. B-R3 R-R3
33. N-N K-B2
34. P-KR4 K-K
35. K-R2 K-Q2
36. K-R3 R-QB3
37. K-N4 RxR
38. BxR N-N5
0-1
Algebraic
1. d4 Nf6
2. c4 e6
3. Nf3 b6
4. g3 Bb7
5. Bg2 Bb4+
6. Nd2 0-0
7. 0-0 Bxd2
8. Qxd2 Qe7
9. b3 d6
10. Bb2 Nd7
11. Nh4 Ne4
12. Qc2 f5
13. Rd1 d5
14. Nf3 a5
15. cxd5 Bxd5
16. Nd2 Nxd2
17. Rxd2 Bxg2
18. Kxg2 Nf6
19. Qc6 Rd8
20. Rc2 Nd5
21. a3 Rf6
22. Re1 e5
23. Qb7 e4
24. Rc1 Rf7
25. e3 Qd7
26. Qc6 f4
27. Qxd7 f3+
28. Kf1

Horowitz (White) vs. Fine (Black)
Match (1934), New York, rd 5, June 1934

Descriptive
1. P-Q4 P-Q4
2. P-QB4 P-K3
3. N-KB3 N-KB3
4. N-B3 P-B3
5. B-N5 QN-Q2
6. P-QR3 P-KR3
7. BxN NxB
8. P-K3 B-K2
9. B-Q3 O-O
10. O-O P-QN3
11. Q-K2 B-N2
12. P-K4 P-B4
13. NxP PxP
14. PxP Q-N3
15. QR-N PxP
16. P-QN4 KR-Q
17. PxP Q-B2
18. KR-QB BxN
19. NxNch QR-N
20. B-K4 RxB
21. BxB R-Q4
22. P-B5 (?)1/2-1/2
23. Q-B4 (?)
Algebraic
1. d4 d5
2. c4 e6
3. Nf3 Nf6
4. Nc3 c6
5. Bg5 Nd7
6. a3 h6
7. Bxf6 Nxf6
8. e3 Be7
9. Bd3 0-0
10. 0-0 b6
11. Qe2 Bb7
12. e4 c5
13. Nxd5 cxd4

Fine (White) vs. Horowitz (Black)
Match (1934), New York, rd 6, June 1934

Descriptive
1. P-Q4 P-Q4
2. P-QB4 P-K3
3. N-KB3 N-KB3
4. N-B3 P-B3
5. B-N5 QN-Q2
6. P-QR3 P-KR3
7. BxN NxB
8. P-K3 B-K2
9. B-Q3 O-O
10. O-O P-QN3
11. Q-K2 B-N2
12. P-K4 P-B4
13. NxP PxP
14. PxP Q-N3
15. QR-N PxP
16. P-QN4 KR-Q
17. PxP Q-B2
18. KR-QB BxN
19. NxNch QR-N
20. B-K4 RxB
21. BxB R-Q4
22. P-B5 Drawn
23. Q-B4
Algebraic
1. d4 d5
2. c4 e6
3. Nf3 Nf6
4. Nc3 c6
5. Bg5 Nd7
6. a3 h6
7. Bxf6 Nxf6
8. e3 Be7
9. Bd3 0-0
10. 0-0 b6
11. Qe2 Bb7
12. e4 c5
13. Nxd5 cxd4

Horowitz (White) vs. Fine (Black)
Match (1934), New York, rd 7, June 1934

Descriptive
1. P-K4 P-K4
2. N-KB3 N-QB3
3. B-N5 P-QR3
4. B-R4 P-Q3
5. BxNch PxB
6. P-Q4 PxP
7. NxP B-Q2
8. O-O N-B3
9. Q-B3 P-B4
10. N-B5 BxN
11. PxB R-R2
12. B-N5 B-K2
13. N-B3 O-O
14. QR-K R-K
15. R-K2 P-R3
16. B-R4 Q-R
17. Q-Q3 B-Q
18. R(B)-K RxR
19. RxR Q-N2
20. P-QN3 R-R
21. BxN BxB
22. N-Q5 B-K4
23. P-B6 P-N3
24. N-K7ch K-R2
25. NxP BxP
26. N-K7ch K-N2
27. Q-N3ch K-R
28. Q-B4 B-N2
29. QxBP Q-N5
30. N-B5 Q-B6
31. QxBch QxQ
32. NxQ NxN
33. R-K7ch K-B3
34. RxP P-QR4
35. K-B P-R5
36. K-K2 PxP
37. RPxP R-R8
38. R-KR7 R-QB8
39. RxPch K-K4
40. K-Q2 R-B8
41. K-K3 R-K8ch
42. K-Q3 R-Q8ch
43. K-B3 1-0
Algebraic
1. e4 e5
2. Nf3 Nc6
3. Bb5 a6
4. Ba4 d6
5. Bxc6+ bxc6
6. d4 exd4
7. Nxd4 Bd7
8. 0-0 Nf6
9. Qf3 c5
10. Nf5 Bxf5
11. exf5 Ra7
12. Bg5 Be7
13. Nc3 0-0
14. Re1 Re8
15. Re2 h6
16. Bh4 Qa8
17. Qd3 Bd8
18. Re1 Rxe2
19. Rxe2 Qb7
20. b3 Ra8
21. Bxf6 Bxf6
22. Nd5 Be5
23. f6 g6
24. Ne7+ Kh7
25. Nxg6 Bxf6
26. Ne7+ Kg7
27. Qg3+ Kh8
28. Qf4 Bg7
29. Qxf7 Qb4
30. Nf5 Qc3
31. Qxg7+ Qxg7
32. Nxg7

Fine (White) vs. Horowitz (Black)
Match (1934), New York, rd 8, June 1934
Semi-Slav Defense: Meran Variation, Blumenfeld Variation

Descriptive
1. P-Q4 P-Q4
2. P-QB4 P-K3
3. N-KB3 N-KB3
4. N-B3 QN-Q2
5. P-K3 P-B3
6. B-Q3 PxP
7. BxBP P-QN4
8. B-Q3 P-QR3
9. P-K4 P-B4
10. P-K5 PxQP
11. NxNP PxN
12. PxN Q-N3
13. O-O PxP
14. B-K4 B-QN2
15. BxB QxB
16. NxP R-KN
17. P-B3 N-K4
18. N-N3 R-Q
19. Q-K2 R-Q4
20. B-B4 N-N3
21. B-N3 P-R4
22. QR-Q RxR
23. RxR P-R5
24. Q-Q2 B-K2
25. B-Q6 Q-N3ch
26. Q-Q4 QxQch
27. RxQ 1/2-1/2
Algebraic
1. d4 d5
2. c4 e6
3. Nf3 Nf6
4. Nc3 Nd7
5. e3 c6
6. Bd3 dxc4
7. Bxc4 b5
8. Bd3 a6
9. e4 c5
10. e5 cxd4
11. Nxb5 axb5
12. exf6 Qb6
13. 0-0 gxf6
14. Be4 Bb7
15. Bxb7 Qxb7
16. Nxd4 Rg8
17. f3 Ne5
18. Nb3 Rd8
19. Qe2 Rd5
20. Bf4 Ng6
21. Bg3 h5
22. Rd1 Rxd1
23. Rxd1 h4
24. Qd2 Be7
25. Bd6 Qb6+
26. Qd4 Qxd4+
27. Rxd4 1/2-1/2

Horowitz (White) vs. Fine (Black)
Match (1934), New York, rd 9, June 1934

Descriptive
1. P-K4 P-QB3
2. P-Q4 P-Q4
3. PxP PxP
4. B-Q3 N-QB3
5. N-KB3 N-B3
6. P-KR3 P-KN3
7. P-B3 B-N2
8. O-O O-O
9. R-K B-B4
10. BxB PxB
11. QN-Q2 N-K5
12. N-B Q-B2
13. B-Q2 P-K3
14. Q-B KR-B
15. B-R6 Q-K2
16. BxB KxB
17. Q-B4 Q-B3
18. N-N3 Q-R3
19. N-K2 QxQ
20. NxQ P-N4
21. N-Q3 P-QR4
22. N(B3)-K5 NxN
23. PxN R-B5
24. K-B N-B4
25. K-K2 NxN
26. KxN P-R5
27. P-QN3 R-B3
28. P-KB4 P-R4
29. R-KN P-KN3
30. QR-N P-R5
31. P-KN4 PxPe.p.
32. RxP PxP
33. PxP P-Q5
34. R-QB R-R6
35. KxP RxNP
36. R-Q3 R-B5ch
37. K-K3 P-N5
38. R-Q8ch K-K2
39. R-Q3 R(N6)xP
40. R(B)-Q P-N6
41. R-QR R-K5ch
42. K-Q2 RxRch
43. KxR RxBP
44. R-R7ch K-B
45. R-N7 R-B5ch
46. K-B4 RxP
0-1
Algebraic
1. e4 c6
2. d4 d5
3. exd5 cxd5
4. Bd3 Nc6
5. Nf3 Nf6
6. h3 g6
7. c3 Bg7
8. 0-0 0-0
9. Re1 Bf5
10. Bxf5 gxf5
11. Nd2 Ne4
12. Nf1 Qc7
13. Bd2 e6
14. Qc1 Rc8
15. Bh6 Qe7
16. Bxg7 Kxg7
17. Qf4 Qf6
18. Ng3 Qh6
19. Ne2 Qxf4
20. Nxf4 b5
21. Nd3 a5
22. Ne5 Nxe5
23. dxe5 Rc4
24. Kf1 Nc5
25. Ke2 Nxd3
26. Kxd3 a4
27. b3 Rc6
28. f4 h5
29. Rg1

Fine (White) vs. Horowitz (Black)
Match (1934), New York, rd 10, June 1934
Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation, Rubinstein Variation Accepted

Descriptive
1. P-K4 P-K4
2. N-KB3 N-QB3
3. N-B3 N-B3
4. B-N5 N-Q5
5. NxN PxN
6. P-K5 PxN
7. PxN QxP
8. QPxP B-B4
9. Q-K2ch Q-K3
10. B-QB4 QxQch
11. KxQ P-QB3
12. B-K3 BxB
13. KxB P-Q4
14. B-Q3 B-K3
15. QR-K O-O-O
16. K-Q2 K-B2
17. R-K5 R(Q)-K
18. R(R)-K P-QN4
19. R(K5)-K3 K-Q3
20. P-QN3 P-N3
21. R-B3 P-KB4
22. P-N3 P-KR4
23. P-KR4 B-Q2
24. RxR RxR
25. R-K3 1/2-1/2
Algebraic
1. e4 e5
2. Nf3 Nc6
3. Nc3 Nf6
4. Bb5 Nd4
5. Nxd4 exd4
6. e5 dxc3
7. exf6 Qxf6
8. dxc3 Bc5
9. Qe2+ Qe6
10. Bc4 Qxe2+
11. Kxe2 c6
12. Be3 Bxe3
13. Kxe3 d5
14. Bd3 Be6
15. Re1 0-0-0
16. Kd2 Kc7
17. Re5 Re8
18. Re1 b5
19. Re3 Kd6
20. b3 g6
21. Rf3 f5
22. g3 h5
23. h4 Bd7
24. Rxe8 Rxe8
25. Re3 1/2-1/2

July 22, 1934 Los Angeles Times Chess by Herman Steiner

< Prev Index Next >

Chess by Herman SteinerChess by Herman Steiner 22 Jul 1934, Sun The Los Angeles Times (Los Angeles, California) Newspapers.com

L.A. Times Problem No. 481 Composed for The Los Angeles Times by Raymond Zens. White mates in two.
FEN 8/p2K4/Pp1NPB2/3k1bR1/1Pp1r3/2P2r1B/3b1Q2/3R1N2 w - - 0 1

Correction 7/29/1934: FEN 8/p2K4/Pp1NPB2/1p1k1bR1/1Pp1r3/2P2r1B/3b1Q2/3R1N2 w - - 0 1
Key: B-N2/Bg2

L.A. Times Problem No. 482 Composed for The Los Angeles Times by Percy Bowater, Pasadena. White mates in three.
FEN 4K3/8/4k3/4p3/1P1pNp1P/1P5P/3R1R2/4Q3 w - - 0 1
Key: Q-K3/Qe3

Greater Los Angeles Championship Tournament
This lengthy tournament has finally come to an end with Harry Borochow, State champion, as winner. Second place was won by M. Schleifer, Southern California champion, and third place is as yet not decided. More details in our next issue.
The deciding game for first place, from the 1934 Los Angeles championship, between Harry Borochow, State champion, and Mr. Schleifer, Southern California champion.

Harry Borochow (White) vs. Meyer Schleifer (Black)
Descriptive
1. P-K4 P-K4
2. N-KB3 N-QB3
3. B-N5 P-QR3
4. BxN PQ2xKB
5. P-Q4 PxP
6. QxP QxQ
7. NxQ B-Q3
8. N-QB3 N-K2
9. B-K3 P-B3
10. O-O-O O-O?
11. KR-K P-QN3?
12. N(Q4)-K2! R-Q
13. R-Q2 B-K3
14. KR-Q P-QB4
15. N-B4 B-B2
16. N(B4)-Q5 NxN
17. NxN BxN
18. PxB R-K
19. R-K2 R-K5
20. P-KN3 QR-K
21. QR-K QR-K4
22. P-KB3 R-QR5
23. K-N! P-B5
24. P-N3 PxP
25. RPxP R-R6
26. B-B P-QR4
27. P-QB4 P-QN4
28. B-Q2 R-R6
29. RxR! PxR
30. R-K3 B-B4
31. B-B! BxR
32. BxR K-B2
33. K-B2 PxP
34. PxP P-KR4
35. B-N2 B-N8
36. P-R4! B-Q5
37. BxB PxB
38. K-Q3 P-B4
39. PxPe.p. K-K3
40. KxP K-Q3
41. P-N4 KxP
42. PxP P-R4
43. P-B4 P-R5
44. P-KB5 P-R6
45. K-B3 1-0
Algebraic
1. e4 e5
2. Nf3 Nc6
3. Bb5 a6
4. Bxc6 dxc6
5. d4 exd4
6. Qxd4 Qxd4
7. Nxd4 Bd6
8. Nc3 Ne7
9. Be3 f6
10. 0-0-0 0-0
11. Re1 b6?
12. Ne2! Rd8
13. Rd2 Be6
14. Rd1 c5
15. Nf4 Bf7
16. Nd5 Nxd5
17. Nxd5 Bxd5
18. exd5 Re8
19. Re2 Re4
20. g3 Rae8
21. Rde1 Re5
22. f3 Ra4
23. Kb1! c4
24. b3 cxb3
25. axb3 Ra3
26. Bc1 a5
27. c4 b5
28. Bd2

July 13, 1972 Chess Mate by Glenn E. Beidel Chambersburg, Pennsylvania

< Prev Index Next >

Chess MateChess Mate 13 Jul 1972, Thu Public Opinion (Chambersburg, Pennsylvania) Newspapers.com

July 15, 1934 Los Angeles Times Chess by Herman Steiner

< Prev Index Next >

Chess by Herman SteinerChess by Herman Steiner 15 Jul 1934, Sun The Los Angeles Times (Los Angeles, California) Newspapers.com

L.A. Times Problem No. 479 Composed for the Los Angeles Times by H.L. Winings, Decatur, Illinois. White mates in two.
FEN 8/2pB4/1PN1Rb2/1p1krnr1/5Kp1/1P1NPP2/2nQ2b1/8 w - - 0 1
Key: Q-N4/Qb4

L.A. Times Problem No. 480 Composed for the Los Angeles Times by Dr. Gilbert Dobbs, Carrolton, Georgia. White mates in three.
FEN 8/8/8/2k5/1p1N1K2/3Q4/2PP4/8 w - - 0 1
Key: Q-R6/Qa6
For variations and additional notes see the July 29, 1934 edition of L.A. Times.

July 08, 1934 Los Angeles Times Chess by Herman Steiner

< Prev Index Next >

Chess by Herman SteinerChess by Herman Steiner 08 Jul 1934, Sun The Los Angeles Times (Los Angeles, California) Newspapers.com

L.A. Times Problem No. 477 “The Chess Review” By A. J. Fink. White mates in two.
FEN 8/rbp3KN/1b2PRp1/p6p/Rq4kp/3B3p/2Q1PP1r/1n1N4 w - - 0 1
Key: QxP/Qxc7
Threat 2. RxP mate. A very beautiful and clever example of “Mutual Interference” between Queen and Bishops. The respective pins of Queen and Rook increase the interest and quality of the composition.
A minor triple duel occurs when the Queen defends the threat at 1. … KB5; either the R or QxQ mate. But as it does not occur in the main play it can and should be overlooked. A true “Finckian” accomplishment.

L.A. Times Problem No. 478 “The Chess Review” by Vincent L. Eaton. White mates in three.
FEN 3r4/1n1pRp1n/8/5p1N/R1p2K2/1p1kP3/8/BN1B4 w - - 0 1
Key: K-K5/Ke5
See multiple variations in the July 22, 1934 edition of the L.A. Times.

Chess Player Gets JobChess Player Gets Job 13 Jul 1934, Fri The Los Angeles Times (Los Angeles, California) Newspapers.com

July 01, 1934 Los Angeles Times Chess by Herman Steiner

< Prev Index Next >

Chess by Herman SteinerChess by Herman Steiner 01 Jul 1934, Sun The Los Angeles Times (Los Angeles, California) Newspapers.com

L.A. Times Problem No. 476 “The Chess Review” by Mannis Charosh. White mates in two.
FEN 2N1n3/4n3/3bpp2/5k1B/4pP2/6PK/2Q5/8 w - - 0 1
Key: Q-B7/Qc7
The tries defeated as follows: Q-B2 and Q-Q2 by P-K4! Q-K by BxP.

June 17, 1934 Los Angeles Times Chess by Herman Steiner

< Prev Index Next >

Chess by Herman SteinerChess by Herman Steiner 17 Jun 1934, Sun The Los Angeles Times (Los Angeles, California) Newspapers.com

L.A. Times Problem No. 472 “The Falkirk Herald” Sixth prize by J. Peris Pardo. White mates in two.
FEN 1B1Q4/7n/5pN1/br1B3K/1PPk2NR/2R5/1Ppr4/3b4 w - - 0 1
Key: N-B8/Nf8

L.A. Times Problem No. 473 “B.C.M. 1929” by J. B. Laws. White mates in three.
FEN 8/3p4/5pN1/1p1p1P1p/3k3P/P7/2Q2NP1/6K1 w - - 0 1
Key: N-K7/Ne7
See the L.A. Times, July 08, 1934 edition for additional variations.

The following two games are from the match which is at present in progress in New York City.

Israel Albert Horowitz vs Reuben Fine
Match (1934), New York, rd 1, Jun-??
Dutch Defense: Classical. Ilyin-Zhenevsky Variation General (A97) 0-1

Reuben Fine vs Israel Albert Horowitz
Horowitz - Fine Match (1934), New York, NY USA, rd 2, Jun-??
Slav Defense: Czech. Lasker Variation (D18) 1-0

Descriptive
1. P-Q4 P-Q4
2. P-QB4 P-QB3
3. N-QB3 N-B3
4. N-B3 PxP
5. P-QR4 B-B4
6. P-K3 N-R3
7. BxP N-N5
8. O-O P-K3
9. Q-K2 B-K2
10. R-Q O-O
11. P-K4 B-N5
12. B-N3 Q-R4
13. P-R3 BxN
14. QxB R(R)-Q
15. B-K3 R-Q2
16. P-N4 R(B)-Q
17. P-N5 N-K
18. P-R4 P-QB4
19. P-Q5 P-K4
20. P-R5 B-Q3
21. K-N2 P-QR3
22. R-R N-Q6
23. P-N6 P-B5
24. B-B2 N-B5ch
25. BxN PxB
26. P-K5 BxP
27. B-B5 R-K2
28. PxBPch KxP!
29. R(QR)-K BxN
30. B-K6ch K-B
31. PxB N-B3
32. R-R4 RxP
33. RxP R-N4ch
34. K-B K-K
35. RxN PxR
36. QxBP R(N4)-N2
37. P-R6 1-0
Algebraic
1. d4 d5
2. c4 c6
3. Nc3 Nf6
4. Nf3 dxc4
5. a4 Bf5
6. e3 Na6
7. Bxc4 Nb4
8. 0-0 e6
9. Qe2 Be7
10. Rd1 0-0
11. e4 Bg4
12. Bb3 Qa5
13. h3 Bxf3
14. Qxf3 Rd8
15. Be3 Rd7
16. g4 Rd8
17. g5 Ne8
18. h4 c5
19. d5 e5
20. h5 Bd6
21. Kg2 a6
22. Rh1 Nd3
23. g6 c4
24. Bc2 Nf4+
25. Bxf4 exf4
26. e5 Bxe5
27. Bf5 Re7
28. gxf7+ Kxf7!
29. Re1 Bxc3
30. Be6+ Kf8
31. bxc3 Nf6
32. Rh4 Rxd5
33. Rxf4 Rg5+
34. Kf1 Ke8
35. Rxf6 gxf6
36. Qxf6 Rg7
37. h6 1-0

Chess Players Gather at Sierra Madre TodayChess Players Gather at Sierra Madre Today 23 Jun 1934, Sat The Los Angeles Times (Los Angeles, California) Newspapers.com

Chess Players Gather At Sierra Madre Today
SIERRA MADRE, June 22, 1934. The annual trek of Southern California chess masters, enthusiasts and novices to Sierra Madre, honoring Charles Morphy, international chess wizard of a century ago, will be held tomorrow, when the Sierra Madre Chamber of Commerce and city officials hold the fifth annual Morphy Day program of chess play. This year, a spectacular lecture-demonstration of one of the Morphy games will be staged on the lawn of Sierra Madre City Park, with costumed children serving as chess pieces. Herman Steiner, international chess expert and chess editor of The Times, will explain the significance of the strategy of the famous Morphy moves. Mrs. Frances Eakman, writer and dramatist, will direct the children.
An eleven-hour program has been arranged by members of the Sierra Madre Chess Club, starting at 1 p.m. with simultaneous and casual games and occasional lectures. Early afternoon matches will include a women's team match, with Mrs. Elizabeth Hillman, Pasadena, captaining five women opposing Mrs. S. Wolf of Los Angeles and a team of five women.


June 10, 1934 Los Angeles Times Chess by Herman Steiner

< Prev Index Next >

Chess by Herman SteinerChess by Herman Steiner 10 Jun 1934, Sun The Los Angeles Times (Los Angeles, California) Newspapers.com

L.A. Times Problem No. 470. “The Falkirk Herald.” 5th Prize by N. Easter. White mates in two.
FEN 8/8/4NN2/8/2P2P2/1p2qRr1/1Q1Pk1B1/2K2RB1 w - - 0 1
Key: R-Q/Rd1
The strong try of N-B5 will be defeated by QxBP!

L.A. Times Problem No. 471. “La Liberte.” Second prize by C. Chapmann. White mates in three.
FEN R7/bkB1pN2/2p1P3/2pb4/N7/2p5/R1P4K/7Q w - - 0 1
Key: K-N/Kg1
See additional variations in the June 24, 1934 edition.

Games From North vs. South
These two interesting games were played in San Luis Obispo on May 27 and show the importance of the opening in tournament play. The score of the match: 12½-12½.

Dmitri Vedensky, North (white) vs. George S G Patterson, South (black)
King's Indian Defense

Descriptive
1. P-Q4 N-KB3
2. P-QB4 P-KN3
3. N-QB3 B-N2
4. P-KN3 P-Q4
5. PxP NxP
6. P-K4 NxN
7. PxN P-QB4
8. N-K2 O-O
9. B-N2 N-QB3
10. P-Q5 N-K4
11. O-O Q-R4
12. Q-B2 B-N5
13. P-B3 B-Q2
14. B-N5 KR-K
15. P-QB4 B-R5
16. Q-B Q-R3
17. N-B3 NxQBP
18. R-QN B-Q2
19. R-K N-K4
20. B-B P-B5
21. K-N2 QR-B
22. Q-Q2 N-Q6
23. BxN PxB
24. KR-QB P-K3
25. PxP BxP
26. Q-N2 BxN
27. RxB RxR
28. QxR R-QB
29. Q-R R-B7ch
30. K-R QxRP!
31. QxQ RxQ
32. RxP K-N2!
33. P-K5 B-Q4
34. B-B6ch K-R3
35. P-K6 P-Q7!
36. R-N BxPch
37. K-N PxP
38. P-KR4 P-Q8(q)ch
0-1
Algebraic
1. d4 Nf6
2. c4 g6(a)
3. Nc3 Bg7
4. g3(b) d5(c)
5. cxd5 Nxd5
6. e4(d) Nxc3
7. bxc3 c5(e)
8. Ne2 0-0
9. Bg2 Nc6
10. d5(f) Ne5
11. 0-0 Qa5
12. Qc2 Bg4
13. f3 Bd7(g)
14. Bg5 Re8
15. c4?(h) Ba4
16. Qc1(i) Qa6(j)
17. Nc3 Nxc4
18. Rb1 Bd7
19. Re1(k) Ne5
20. Bf1 c4
21. Kg2 Rec8
22. Qd2 Nd3(l)
23. Bxd3 cxd3
24. Rec1 e6(m)
25. dxe6 Bxe6
26. Qb2 Bxc3(n)
27. Rxc3 Rxc3
28. Qxc3 Rc8
29. Qa1 Rc2+
30. Kh1 Qxa2!
31. Qxa2 Rxa2
32. Rxb7 Kg7!
33. e5 Bd5
34. Bf6+ Kh6
35. e6(o) d2!
36. Rb1 Bxf3+
37. Kg1 fxe6
38. h4 d1=Q+
0-1

Annotated by Herman Steiner
(a) The Kings Indian Defense, quite popular some years ago, but now discarded by most masters with the exception of Bogoljubow and Dr. Euwe.
(b) Not the best, P-K4 playing for the center is better!
(c) Best, and the correct way of taking advantage of White's weak fourth move.
(d) Again not the best. B-N2 was better.
(e) The correct procedure. There have been too many Pawn moves on White's part.
(f) This move certainly does not fit in this position. P-K5 or B-K3 would have been better. Now the white Bishop is useless.
(g) Threatening to enter on the Queen-side.
(h) A blunder which at least loses a Pawn.
(i) This move should lose the exchange.
(j) Black could have won the exchange by N-Q6, but he decided on winning the Queen Bishop Pawn.
(k) Making place for the White Bishop.
(l) P-R3 would be answered by B-K3, and not by BxP, because NxBP, 24. KxN BxB; 25. QxB Q-B3ch; 26. K-N2 QxN
(m) Opening more lines for the R and the B.
(n) Permitting B of opposite color, but because of the unfortunate position of the White K, the game is won for Black.
(o) Desperation! Resignation was in order.

William P. Barlow (white) vs. Herman Steiner (black)
Italian Game: Scotch Gambit, Anderssen Attack

Descriptive
1. P-K4 P-K4
2. N-KB3 N-QB3
3. B-B4 N-B3
4. P-Q4 PxP
5. O-O NxP
6. R-K P-Q4
7. BxP QxB
8. N-B3 Q-QR4
9. NxN B-K3
10. N(Q4)-N5 O-O-O
11. NxB PxN
12. RxP B-Q3
13. B-N5 QR-K
14. Q-K QxQch
15. QRxQ RxR
16. RxR K-Q2
17. R-K4 R-K
18. RxR KxR
19. K-B K-Q2
20. B-Q2 P-KR3
21. K-K2 K-K3
22. K-Q3 K-Q4
23. P-B3 PxP
24. BxP N-K4ch
25. K-K3 NxN
26. KxN B-K4
27. BxB KxB
28. K-N4 K-K5
29. K-R5 K-B4
30. P-KR4 P-B4
31. P-N4ch K-B3
32. P-R4 P-QN3
33. P-N5ch PxP
34. PxPch K-B4
0-1
Algebraic
1. e4 e5
2. Nf3 Nc6
3. Bc4 Nf6
4. d4 exd4
5. 0-0 Nxe4
6. Re1 d5
7. Bxd5 Qxd5
8. Nc3 Qa5
9. Nxe4 Be6
10. Ng5 0-0-0
11. Nxe6 fxe6
12. Rxe6 Bd6
13. Bg5 Re8
14. Qe1 Qxe1+
15. Rxe1 Rxe6
16. Rxe6 Kd7
17. Re4 Re8
18. Rxe8 Kxe8
19. Kf1 Kd7
20. Bd2 h6
21. Ke2 Ke6
22. Kd3 Kd5
23. c3 dxc3
24. Bxc3 Ne5+
25. Ke3 Nxf3
26. Kxf3 Be5
27. Bxe5 Kxe5
28. Kg4 Ke4
29. Kh5 Kf5
30. h4 c5
31. g4+ Kf6
32. a4 b6
33. g5+ hxg5
34. hxg5+ Kf5
0-1

June 03, 1934 Los Angeles Times Chess by Herman Steiner

< Prev Index Next >

Chess by Herman SteinerChess by Herman Steiner 03 Jun 1934, Sun The Los Angeles Times (Los Angeles, California) Newspapers.com

L.A. Times Problem No. 468. “The Falkirk Herald” Fourth prize by G. Szugyi. White mates in two.
FEN K7/Qn1R4/B2q4/4p3/PB6/2N3p1/Pp1k2Np/1R4rb w - - 0 1
Key: N-K3/Ne3

L.A. Times Problem No. 469. Composed for the Los Angeles Times by Robert W. Anderson. White mates in three.
FEN 8/K7/8/4N3/k2P1R2/2B5/PP6/8 w - - 0 1
Key: R-B8/Rf8
1. R-B8 K-N4; 2. R-QR8 K-R5; 3. K-N6 mate.

A very interesting game from South vs. North between the State champion, Harry Borochow, and J. Tippin, on board No. 2

Harry Borochow (white) vs. John Tippin (black)
Vienna Game

Unresolved Chess Game
Unresolved Chess Game: Can you solve it?

Descriptive
1. P-K4 P-K4
2. N-QB3 N-KB3
3. P-B4 P-Q4
4. PxP PxP
5. N-B3 B-QB4
6. Q-K2 B-B4
7. N-Q P-KN4
8. P-Q3 P-N5!
9. PxN PxN
10. QxPch N-Q2
11. PxB Q-R5ch
12. K-Q2 PxP
13. BxP Q-N4ch
14. K-B3 QxB
15. P-K6 PxP
16. B-K3 P-Q5ch!
17. BxP BxBch
18. KxB QxR!
19. PxP O-O-O!
0-1
Algebraic
1. e4 e5
2. Nc3 Nf6
3. f4 d5
4. fxe5 dxe4
5. Nf3 Bc5
6. Qe2 Bf5
7. Nd1 g5
8. d3 g4!
9. exf6 gxf3
10. Q-N5ch does not work

Recommended Books

Understanding Chess by William Lombardy Chess Duels, My Games with the World Champions, by Yasser Seirawan No Regrets: Fischer-Spassky 1992, by Yasser Seirawan Chess Fundamentals, by Jose Capablanca Bobby Fischer Teaches Chess, by Bobby Fischer My 60 Memorable Games, by Bobby Fischer Bobby Fischer Games of Chess, by Bobby Fischer The Modern Chess Self Tutor, by David Bronstein Russians versus Fischer, by Mikhail Tal, Plisetsky, Taimanov, et al

'til the world understands why Robert J. Fischer criticised the U.S./British and Russian military industry imperial alliance and their own Israeli Apartheid. Sarah Wilkinson explains:

Bobby Fischer, First Amendment, Freedom of Speech
What a sad story Fischer was,” typed a racist, pro-imperialist colonial troll who supports mega-corporation entities over human rights, police state policies & white supremacy.
To which I replied: “Really? I think he [Bob Fischer] stood up to the broken system of corruption and raised awareness! Whether on the Palestinian/Israel-British-U.S. Imperial Apartheid scam, the Bush wars of ‘7 countries in 5 years,’ illegally, unconstitutionally which constituted mass xenocide or his run in with police brutality in Pasadena, California-- right here in the U.S., police run rampant over the Constitution of the U.S., on oath they swore to uphold, but when Americans don't know the law, and the cops either don't know or worse, “don't care” -- then I think that's pretty darn “sad”. I think Mr. Fischer held out and fought the good fight, steadfast til the day he died, and may he Rest In Peace.
Educate yourself about U.S./State Laws --
https://www.youtube.com/@AuditTheAudit/videos
After which the troll posted a string of profanities, confirming there was never any genuine sentiment of “compassion” for Mr. Fischer, rather an intent to inflict further defamatory remarks.

This ongoing work is a tribute to the life and accomplishments of Robert “Bobby” Fischer who passionately loved and studied chess history. May his life continue to inspire many other future generations of chess enthusiasts and kibitzers, alike.

Robert J. Fischer, Kid Chess Wizard 1956March 9, 1943 - January 17, 2008

The photograph of Bobby Fischer (above) from the March 02, 1956 The Tampa Times was discovered by Sharon Mooney (Bobby Fischer Newspaper Archive editor) on February 01, 2018 while gathering research materials for this ongoing newspaper archive project. Along with lost games now being translated into Algebraic notation and extractions from over two centuries of newspapers, it is but one of the many lost treasures to be found in the pages of old newspapers since our social media presence was first established November 11, 2017.

Special Thanks