The Gift of Chess

Notice to commercial publishers seeking use of images from this collection of chess-related archive blogs. For use of the many large color restorations, two conditions must be met: 1) It is YOUR responsibility to obtain written permissions for use from the current holders of rights over the original b/w photo. Then, 2) make a tax-deductible donation to The Gift of Chess in honor of Robert J. Fischer-Newspaper Archives. A donation in the amount of $250 USD or greater is requested for images above 2000 pixels and other special request items. For small images, such as for fair use on personal blogs, all credits must remain intact and a donation is still requested but negotiable. Please direct any photographs for restoration and special request (for best results, scanned and submitted at their highest possible resolution), including any additional questions to S. Mooney, at bobbynewspaperblogs•gmail. As highlighted in the ABC News feature, chess has numerous benefits for individuals, including enhancing critical thinking and problem-solving skills, improving concentration and memory, and promoting social interaction and community building. Initiatives like The Gift of Chess have the potential to bring these benefits to a wider audience, particularly in areas where access to educational and recreational resources is limited.

Best of Chess Fischer Newspaper Archives
• Robert J. Fischer, 1955 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1956 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1957 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1958 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1959 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1960 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1961 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1962 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1963 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1964 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1965 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1966 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1967 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1968 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1969 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1970 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1971 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1972 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1973 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1974 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1975 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1976 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1977 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1978 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1979 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1980 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1981 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1982 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1983 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1984 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1985 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1986 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1987 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1988 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1989 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1990 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1991 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1992 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1993 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1994 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1995 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1996 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1997 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1998 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1999 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 2000 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 2001 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 2002 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 2003 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 2004 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 2005 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 2006 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 2007 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 2008 ➦
Chess Columns
Chessgames.com: Newspaper Chess Games Archive Chess.com: Newspaper Chess Games Archive Facebook: Bobby Fischer History Youtube: Newspaper Chess Games Archive My Life Notes lichess.org: Analyze Chess Game lichess.org: Board Editor Chess Notation Converter Chess.com: Chess Board Analysis Notes

April 28, 1918 Philadelphia Inquirer Chess and Checkers

< Prev Index Next >

ChessChess 28 Apr 1918, Sun The Philadelphia Inquirer (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) Newspapers.com

We are pleased to note that Stasch Mlotkowski, formerly a member of the Franklin Chess Club, now residing at Los Angeles, Cal., recently gave a simultaneous exhibition at the Pacific Chess Club, meeting twelve of their members and winning all of the games.

The following interesting game was played in one of the minor tournaments of the National Correspondence Chess Association.

Benjamin Altman (white) vs. Robert J. Ray (black)
Latvian Gambit: Behting Variation

Benjamin Altman vs. R. J. Ray, 1917

Descriptive
1. P-K4 P-K4
2. N-KB3 P-KB4
3. B-B4 PxP
4. NxP Q-N4
5. N-B7 QxP
6. R-B P-Q4
7. NxR N-KB3
8. BxP B-KR6
9. B-B7ch K-Q2
10. Q-K2 N-B3
11. P-QB3 N-K4
12. B-B4 N-Q6ch
13. K-Q QxRch
14. QxQ BxQ
15. N-B7 N-KN5
16. P-QN3 NxPch
17. K-QB2 N-K8ch
18. K-N2 N-Q8mate 
Algebraic
1. e4 e5
2. Nf3 f5
3. Bc4 fxe4
4. Nxe5 Qg5
5. Nf7 Qxg2
6. Rf1 d5
7. Nxh8 Nf6
8. Bxd5 Bh3
9. Bf7+ Kd7
10. Qe2 Nc6
11. c3 Ne5
12. Bc4 Nd3+
13. Kd1 Qxf1+
14. Qxf1 Bxf1
15. Nf7 Ng4
16. b3 Ngxf2+
17. Kc2 Ne1+
18. Kb2 Nd1#

The following is the tenth game in the Chajes-Janowski match. The game was continued to the eightieth move when a draw was agreed upon.

Oscar Chajes vs David Janowski

March 15, 1918 Salt Lake City Tribune, Chess, Salt Lake City, Utah

< Prev Index Next >

ChessChess 15 Mar 1918, Fri The Salt Lake Tribune (Salt Lake City, Utah) Newspapers.com

(a) The usual move is P-B3 and the Handbuch gives as a reply 4. … BxN saying 4. … N-QB3, is followed by 5. Q-N3 Q-Q2; 6. BxPch QxB; 7. QxP, overlooking that this is only a draw after 7. … K-Q2; 8. QxR BxN; 9. PxB QxBP; 10. R-N1 QxKPch. Black may also reply to 4. P-B3 with either P-QB3 or N-Q2.
(b) P-B3 could not be played, so as to preserve the king's bishop.
(c) B-N3 or B-N5ch could be played, but there is nothing wrong with White's maneuver of playing so as to take with knight, only this knight should have been brought to K3 later.
(d) B-N5 followed by N-K3, was now in order.
(e) Unnecessary and creating a weakness on the king's side, which Black soon makes use of.
(f) Rather Q-K3.
(g) After this White cannot save the game. He probably overlooked Black's 23rd and thought he would get enough for his queen. K-R2 should have been played. Then 17. … BxR; 18. NxB R-B5 would have left the material even. Black having the advantage in position.
(h) Perhaps White on his 20th turn, in preferring Q-K2 to Q-K3, thought he could here play K-B3. But then 22. … Q-R6ch; 23. K-K4 Q-B4ch; 24. K-Q5 P-B3ch; 25. KxP P-K5, and mate could not long be averted.
(i) The simplest way to win.

M. W. Testa vs. Stasch Mlotkowski, 1918

Mor Weiss Testa (white) vs. Stasch Mlotkowski (black)
Philidor Defense

Descriptive
1. P-K4 P-K4
2. N-KB3 P-Q3
3. B-B4 B-N5
4. P-Q3 N-QB3
5. B-K3 N-R4
6. QN-Q2 NxB
7. NxN P-KB4
8. PxP BxP
9. O-O N-B3
10. Q-K1 B-K2
11. P-KR3 O-O
12. B-N5 N-R4
13. BxB QxB
14. KN-Q2 N-B5
15. K-R2 NxNP
16. KxN BxPch
17. KxB Q-K3ch
18. K-N3 Q-N3ch
19. K-R2 R-B4
20. Q-K2 Q-R3ch
21. K-N3 R-N4ch
22. Q-N4 RxQch
23. KxR P-Q4
24. NxP Q-K3ch
25. K-N3 QxNch
26. P-B4 Q-K6ch
27. N-B3 R-KB1
28. P-B5 RxP
29. K-N2 R-B3
30. QR-K1 RxN
31. RxQ RxR
32. K-B2 R-K3
33. R-KN1 K-B2
34. R-N4 P-KN3
35. R-QN4 R-N3
Resigns
Algebraic
1. e4 e5
2. Nf3 d6
3. Bc4 Bg4
4. d3 Nc6
5. Be3 Na5
6. Nd2 Nxc4
7. Nxc4 f5
8. exf5 Bxf5
9. 0-0 Nf6
10. Qe1 Be7
11. h3 0-0
12. Bg5 Nh5
13. Bxe7 Qxe7
14. Nd2 Nf4
15. Kh2 Nxg2
16. Kxg2 Bxh3+
17. Kxh3 Qe6+
18. Kg3 Qg6+
19. Kh2 Rf5
20. Qe2 Qh6+
21. Kg3 Rg5+
22. Qg4 Rxg4+
23. Kxg4 d5
24. Nxe5 Qe6+
25. Kg3 Qxe5+
26. f4 Qe3+
27. Nf3 Rf8
28. f5 Rxf5
29. Kg2 Rf6
30. Re1 Rxf3
31. Rxe3 Rxe3
32. Kf2 Re6
33. Rg1 Kf7
34. Rg4 g6
35. Rb4 Rb6
0-1

January 29, 1922 San Francisco Chronicle, Chess by E. J. Clarke, San Francisco, California

< Prev Index Next >

ChessChess 29 Jan 1922, Sun San Francisco Chronicle (San Francisco, California) Newspapers.com

We are obliged to Morgan Ward, president of the University of California Chess club, for the following interesting item: “Last Tuesday evening State Champion E. W. Gruer gave a simultaneous exhibition at the U of C chess club. He played thirteen games; won eleven, drew one and lost one. Play lasted about two and a half hours.” Ward is too modest; he failed to mention that he won the game that Gruer lost. It remained for Gruer to identify the winner. He also forwarded the score of the game which appears below.

Game No. 57
From Gruer's simultaneous exhibition at the University of California Chess club:

Elmer Walker Gruer (white) vs. Morgan Ward (black)
Indian Defense: Normal Variation
Submitted to chessgames.com on 05/02/2025

Elmer Walker Gruer vs. Morgan Ward, 1922

Descriptive
1. P-Q4 N-KB3
2. P-QB4 P-K3
3. N-QB3 P-QN3
4. P-K4 P-Q4
5. BPxP PxP
6. PxP NxP
7. B-QB4 B-QN5
8. Q-N3 B-N2
9. N-K2 O-O
10. O-O NxN
11. PxN B-Q3
12. B-B4 BxB
13. NxB N-QB3
14. Q-B2 Q-N4
15. N-R3 QxPch
16. KxQ NxPdis.ch
17. Q-K4 BxQch
18. P-B3 NxP
19. RxN BxRch
20. KxB R-Q
21. R-K R-Q3
22. R-K7 R-QB3
23. B-N3 RxPch
24. K-N4 P-R4ch
25. K-R4 R-Q
26. N-N5 R-Q5ch
27. KxP P-N3ch
Resigns
Algebraic
1. d4 Nf6
2. c4 e6
3. Nc3 b6
4. e4 d5
5. cxd5 exd5
6. exd5 Nxd5
7. Bc4 Bb4
8. Qb3 Bb7
9. Ne2 0-0
10. 0-0 Nxc3
11. bxc3 Bd6
12. Bf4 Bxf4
13. Nxf4 Nc6
14. Qc2 Qg5
15. Nh3 Qxg2+
16. Kxg2 Nxd4+
17. Qe4 Bxe4+
18. f3 Nxf3
19. Rxf3 Bxf3+
20. Kxf3 Rd8
21. Re1 Rd6
22. Re7 Rc6
23. Bb3 Rxc3+
24. Kg4 h5+
25. Kh4 Rd8
26. Ng5 Rd4+
27. Kxh5 g6+
0-1

GAME No. 58
The following game is from the pending championship tournament of the Los Angeles Chess club. Rosenblatt is well known in local chess circles, for many years being a member of the Mechanics' Institute.

Lawrence Ascher Rosenblatt (white) vs. Harry Borochow (black)
Scotch Game: Classical Variation, Intermezzo Variation
Submitted to chessgames.com on 05/02/2025

Lawrence Ascher Rosenblatt vs Harry Borochow, 1922

Descriptive
1. P-K4 P-K4
2. N-KB3 N-QB3
3. P-Q4 PxP
4. NxP B-B4
5. NxN Q-B3
6. Q-Q2 QPxN
7. B-Q3 B-K3
8. Q-K2 O-O-O
9. N-B3 Q-K2
10. B-K3 N-B3
11. O-O-O B-QN5
12. B-Q2 Q-B4!
13. K-N Q-QR4
14. P-QR3 BxP
15. PxB QxP
16. B-B4 R-Q5
17. B-N3 BxB
18. PxB QxPch
19. K-B R-N5
20. B-K NxP
21. Q-R2 NxN
22. QxQ RxQ
23. BxN RxBch
24. K-N2 R-B4
Resigns
Algebraic
1. e4 e5
2. Nf3 Nc6
3. d4 exd4
4. Nxd4 Bc5
5. Nxc6 Qf6
6. Qd2 dxc6
7. Bd3 Be6
8. Qe2 0-0-0
9. Nc3 Qe7
10. Be3 Nf6
11. 0-0-0 Bb4
12. Bd2 Qc5!
13. Kb1 Qa5
14. a3 Bxa3
15. bxa3 Qxa3
16. Bc4 Rd4
17. Bb3 Bxb3
18. cxb3 Qxb3+
19. Kc1 Rb4
20. Be1 Nxe4
21. Qa2 Nxc3
22. Qxb3 Rxb3
23. Bxc3 Rxc3+
24. Kb2 Rc5
0-1

September 09, 1917 The Los Angeles Times, Chess Notes, Los Angeles, California

< Prev Index Next >

Game No. 61Game No. 61 09 Sep 1917, Sun The Los Angeles Times (Los Angeles, California) Newspapers.com

CHESS. Game No. 61—Evans Gambit Declined.
An off-hand game played at the club-rooms last winter between N. W. Banks and Stasch Mlotkowski. Contributed, with notes, by Mr. Mlotkowski.

(a) Held superior to N-R4.
(b) Or, Q-B3, but White has the edge in either case.
(c) An error. White could have replied BxN, RxB, QxP(ch) at once, but is in no hurry to take the Pawn, thinking it will stay.
(d) Better PxP.
(e) The advance of their Pawn is decisive.

Stasch Mlotkowski (white) vs. Newell William Banks (black)

Unresolved Chess Game
Unresolved Chess Game: Can you solve it?

Descriptive
1. P-K4 P-K4
2. KN-B3 QN-B3
3. B-B4 B-B4
4. P-QN4 B-N3
5. P-QN5 N-Q5
6. NxN BxN
7. P-QB3 B-N3
8. P-Q4 Q-N4
9. O-O P-Q3
10. P-QR4 P-QB3
11. P-R5 B-B2
12. P-KB4 P-KB3
13. P-KB5 P-KR4
14. N-Q2 B-Q2
15. BxN RxB
16. QxPch Q-KB5
17. QxQ KxQ
18. PxBP NPxP
19. N-KB3 QR-N1
20. B-Q2 R-N4
21. P-QB4 R-N6
22. KR-QN1 KR-QN1
23. RxR RxR
24. PxP QPxP
25. K-B2 P-B4
26. B-K3 B-Q3
27. R-Q1 K-K2
28. R-QR1 B-B3
29. N-Q2 R-N7
30. K-B3 K-Q2
31. P-N4 P-B3
32. P-R4 R-N5
33. P-N5 R-R5
34. PxP PxP
35. R-KN1 RxRP
36. P-R5 B-KB1
37. P-R6 BxP
38. BxB R-R6ch
39. B-K3 B-R5
40. R-N7ch K-K1
41. R-QB7 B-Q8ch
42. K-B2 P-R4
43. BxP R-QB6
44. R-K7ch K-Q1
45. R-QR7 P-R5
46. B-K7ch Resigns
Algebraic
1. e4 e5
2. Nf3 Nc6
3. Bc4 Bc5
4. b4 Bb6
5. b5 Nd4
6. Nxd4 Bxd4
7. c3 Bb6
8. d4 Qg5
9. 0-0 d6
10. a4 c6
11. a5 Bc7
12. f4 f6
13. f5 h5
14. Nd2 Bd7
15. Bxg8 Rxg8
16. Qxh5+

December 10, 1916 Evening star, Chess, Washington, District of Columbia

< Prev Index Next >

ChessChess 10 Dec 1916, Sun Evening star (Washington, District of Columbia) Newspapers.com

Played in telegraph match, Los Angeles vs. San Diego.

(a) Stronger than R-K1, followed by QN-Q2 and N-B1, as Black's course in trying to release himself as he does in the present game by N-Q1 and P-B3 would have been safe had White so played.
(b) Black cannot do this now that White can reply N-B4. In answer to 9. … Castles White would also have played N-B4, and Black could hardly afford the loss of two moves by 10. N-B3. Black's best chance seems to have been 9. … B-R6.
(c) The most prolonging defense was 11. … P-B4. Then 12. BxP P-Q3; 13. BxP BxB; 14. NxBch QxN; 15. PxP gives White a winning superiority.
(d) N-N1 would have left Black with a badly undeveloped game.

Stasch Mlotkowski (white) vs. Allen Gilbert Pearsall (black)
Italian Game: Evans Gambit, Stone-Ware Variation
Submitted to chessgames.com on 04/29/2025

Stasch Mlotkowski vs. Allen G. Pearsall, 1916

Descriptive
1. P-K4 P-K4
2. N-KB3 N-QB3
3. B-B4 B-B4
4. P-QN4 BxP
5. P-B3 B-Q3
6. P-Q4 Q-K2
7. O-O N-B3
8. QN-Q2 N-Q1
9. B-Q3 P-B3
10. N-B4 B-B2
11. B-R3 Q-K3
12. PxP NxP
13. R-K1 NxQBP
14. Q-B2 N-N4
15. N-Q6ch BxN
16. PxB NxB
17. Q-B3 N-N4
18. QxNP R-B1
19. BxN PxB
20. N-N5 Resigns
Algebraic
1. e4 e5
2. Nf3 Nc6
3. Bc4 Bc5
4. b4 Bxb4
5. c3 Bd6
6. d4 Qe7
7. 0-0 Nf6
8. Nd2 Nd8
9. Bd3 c6
10. Nc4 Bc7
11. Ba3 Qe6
12. dxe5 Nxe4
13. Re1 Nxc3
14. Qc2 Nb5
15. Nd6+ Bxd6
16. exd6 Nxa3
17. Qc3 Nb5
18. Qxg7 Rf8
19. Bxb5 cxb5
20. Ng5 1-0

November 19, 1916 Evening star, Chess, Washington, District of Columbia

< Prev Index Next >

ChessChess 19 Nov 1916, Sun Evening star (Washington, District of Columbia) Newspapers.com

The games published today are further examples of the skill of Stasch Mlotkowski in the Evans Gambit. Next week two games played by A. W. Fox at the “Adams” variation of the Evans will be given.

(a) My adversary invariably plays this move, which he considers much stronger than derailing the knight at QR4.
(b) Much stronger than N-Q2, which can be answered by B-QB4.
(c) Black cannot win the exchange safely by B-Q5, N-Q2, BxR, as then White gets an overwhelming attack by QxB, P-KB3; N-B3 N-K2; NxP PxN; QxP.
(d) Waterman usually castles at this point, and the game continues N-B3 B-N5; P-KR3 BxN; QxB.
(e) It would still be unsafe to take the exchange.
(f) Black is badly tied up, but N-B3 would have been less disastrous.

Stasch Mlotkowski (white) vs. Charles West Waterman (black)
Italian Game: Evans Gambit, McDonnell Defense, Main Line
Submitted to chessgames.com on 04/29/2025

Stasch Mlotkowski vs. Charles West Waterman, 1916

Descriptive
1. P-K4 P-K4
2. N-KB3 N-QB3
3. B-B4 B-B4
4. P-QN4 BxP
5. P-B3 B-B4
6. P-Q4 PxP
7. PxP B-N3
8. O-O P-Q3
9. P-Q5 N-K4
10. NxN PxN
11. B-R3 N-K2
12. N-Q2 B-Q5
13. N-B3 P-QB4
14. NxB BPxN
15. P-B4 PxP
16. RxP N-N3
17. R-B2 N-K4
18. QxP P-B3
19. QR-KB1 Q-N3
20. B-B5 Q-B2
21. P-Q6 Q-Q2
22. B-Q5 R-QN1
23. RxP PxR
24. RxP N-B3
25. R-K6ch Resigns
Algebraic
1. e4 e5
2. Nf3 Nc6
3. Bc4 Bc5
4. b4 Bxb4
5. c3 Bc5
6. d4 exd4
7. cxd4 Bb6
8. 0-0 d6
9. d5 Ne5
10. Nxe5 dxe5
11. Ba3 Ne7
12. Nd2 Bd4
13. Nf3 c5
14. Nxd4 cxd4
15. f4 exf4
16. Rxf4 Ng6
17. Rf2 Ne5
18. Qxd4 f6
19. Rf1 Qb6
20. Bc5 Qc7
21. d6 Qd7
22. Bd5 Rb8
23. Rxf6 gxf6
24. Rxf6 Nc6
25. Re6+ 1-0

Evans Gambit.

(a) Black has a very difficult game, and this makes it worse. B-N5 or Q-K6 was preferable.
(b) Spoiling White's contemplated QxP, White threatening to win by either this move or NxPch.

Stasch Mlotkowski (white) vs. Charles West Waterman (black)
Italian Game: Evans Gambit, McDonnell Defense, Main Line
Submitted to chessgames.com on 04/29/2025

Stasch Mlotkowski vs. Charles West Waterman, 1916

Descriptive
1. P-K4 P-K4
2. N-KB3 N-QB3
3. B-B4 B-B4
4. P-QN4 BxP
5. P-B3 B-B4
6. P-Q4 PxP
7. PxP B-N3
8. O-O P-Q3
9. P-Q5 N-K4
10. NxN PxN
11. B-R3 B-Q5
12. N-Q2 BxR
13. QxB Q-B3
14. P-B4 PxP
15. P-K5 Q-N3ch
16. K-R1 P-N4
17. P-K6 P-KB3
18. N-K4 Q-K6
19. NxPch NxN
20. QxN QxB
21. QxRch Q-B1
22. B-N5ch P-B3
23. PxP Resigns
Algebraic
1. e4 e5
2. Nf3 Nc6
3. Bc4 Bc5
4. b4 Bxb4
5. c3 Bc5
6. d4 exd4
7. cxd4 Bb6
8. 0-0 d6
9. d5 Ne5
10. Nxe5 dxe5
11. Ba3 Bd4
12. Nd2 Bxa1
13. Qxa1 Qf6
14. f4 exf4
15. e5 Qb6+
16. Kh1 g5
17. e6 f6
18. Ne4 Qe3
19. Nxf6+ Nxf6
20. Qxf6 Qxa3
21. Qxh8+ Qf8
22. Bb5+ c6
23. dxc6 1-0

October 08, 1916 Evening star, Chess, Washington, District of Columbia

< Prev Index Next >

ChessChess 08 Oct 1916, Sun Evening star (Washington, District of Columbia) Newspapers.com

Following is a game from the Dutch tourney, with notes by A. Buen:

Max Marchand vs Adolf Georg Olland

Problem (First Publication)
By S. Mlotkowski
“Rum and Gum”
Mate in Three.

FEN k7/3N4/3N4/3P4/2p2P2/PpP5/1K2P3/Q7 w - - 0 1
Solution: 1. Qh1 Ka7 2. Qh8 Ka6 3. Qa8#

July 09, 1916 Philadelphia Inquirer Chess and Checkers

< Prev Index Next >

ChessChess 09 Jul 1916, Sun The Philadelphia Inquirer (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) Newspapers.com

We have just received an interesting communication from Stasch Mlotkowski, an old member of the Franklin Chess Club and now residing at Los Angeles. Mlotkowski states that the unfinished game in the recent match between Los Angeles and San Diego has been adjudicated a draw, thus Los Angeles wins the match with a score of 5½ to 4½.

A fine game played in the Correspondence Tournament of the Pennsylvania Chess Association between J.E. Narraway, Correspondence Chess champion of Canada, and D. R. Wyeth, of this city.

Douglas R. Wyeth (white) vs. James Ephraim Narraway (black)
Bishop's Opening: Vienna Hybrid
Submitted to chessgames.com on 05/01/2025

Douglas R. Wyeth vs. James Ephraim Narraway

Descriptive
1. P-K4 P-K4
2. N-QB3 N-KB3
3. B-B4 N-B3
4. P-Q3 P-Q3
5. KN-K2 B-K2
6. P-KR3 B-K3
7. B-N3 P-Q4
8. B-N5 P-Q5
9. BxN KBxB
10. N-Q5 N-R4
11. B-R4ch P-B3
12. NxBch PxN
13. N-N3 P-N4
14. B-N3 NxB
15. RPxN P-QR4
16. N-R5 R-KN
17. P-KN4 K-K2
18. Q-Q2 P-QB4
19. P-KB4 P-R5
20. P-B5 B-Q2
21. Q-R6 Q-N3
22. R-KN PxP
23. K-K2 RxR
24. RxR PxP
25. Q-Q2 P-B5
26. Q-N4ch Q-Q3
27. QxQch KxQ
28. NxP R-QR
29. R-QB R-R7
30. K-Q2 RxP
31. RxP P-B6ch
32. K-B RxRch
33. KxR B-B3
34. NxP P-N5
35. N-N5 B-R5ch
36. K-N P-B3
37. N-B3 B-Q8
38. N-K P-N6
Resigns
Algebraic
1. e4 e5
2. Nc3 Nf6
3. Bc4 Nc6
4. d3 d6
5. Ne2 Be7
6. h3 Be6
7. Bb3 d5
8. Bg5 d4
9. Bxf6 Bxf6
10. Nd5 Na5
11. Ba4+ c6
12. Nxf6+ gxf6
13. Ng3 b5
14. Bb3 Nxb3
15. axb3 a5
16. Nh5 Rg8
17. g4 Ke7
18. Qd2 c5
19. f4 a4
20. f5 Bd7
21. Qh6 Qb6
22. Rg1 axb3
23. Ke2 Rxa1
24. Rxa1 bxc2
25. Qd2 c4
26. Qb4+ Qd6
27. Qxd6+ Kxd6
28. Nxf6 Ra8
29. Rc1 Ra2
30. Kd2 Rxb2
31. Rxc2 c3+
32. Kc1 Rxc2+
33. Kxc2 Bc6
34. Nxh7 b4
35. Ng5 Ba4+
36. Kb1 f6
37. Nf3 Bd1
38. Ne1 b3
0-1

An interesting and instructive game was played recently between two contestants who had taken part in the Eagle Correspondence Tournament. The present game was played over the board to test analysis of the game that arose in the correspondence play.

H. E. Waters (white) vs. Dr. G. C. Arata (black)
Petrov's Defense: Classical Attack, Mason Variation
Submitted to chessgames.com on 04/29/2025

H. E. Waters vs. Dr. G. C. Arata, 1915

Descriptive
1. P-K4 P-K4
2. N-KB3 N-KB3
3. NxP P-Q3
4. N-KB3 NxP
5. P-Q4 P-Q4
6. B-Q3 B-K2
7. O-O O-O
8. P-B4 P-QB3
9. Q-B2 P-KB4
10. N-K5 Q-N3
11. B-K3 B-B3
12. P-B5 Q-B2
13. P-B4 P-QN4
14. N-Q2 N-R3
15. Q-N3 R-N
16. NxN PxN
17. BxKP Q-N2
18. NxP K-R
19. NxR PxB
20. NxN QxN
21. P-QR4 PxP
22. RxP Q-K7
23. P-Q5 B-R3
24. KR-R B-QN4
25. RxP B-Q6
26. B-B2 P-K6
27. BxP QxBch
28. K-R Q-K7
29. R-R8 B-Q
30. Q-N6 B-K5
31. R-KN BxPch
1/2-1/2
Algebraic
1. e4 e5
2. Nf3 Nf6
3. Nxe5 d6
4. Nf3 Nxe4
5. d4 d5
6. Bd3 Be7
7. 0-0 0-0
8. c4 c6
9. Qc2 f5
10. Ne5 Qb6
11. Be3 Bf6
12. c5 Qc7
13. f4 b5
14. Nd2 Na6
15. Qb3 Rb8
16. Nxe4 fxe4
17. Bxe4 Qb7
18. Nxc6 Kh8
19. Nxb8 dxe4
20. Nxa6 Qxa6
21. a4 bxa4
22. Rxa4 Qe2
23. d5 Ba6
24. Ra1 Bb5
25. Rxa7 Bd3
26. Bf2 e3
27. Bxe3 Qxe3+
28. Kh1 Qe2
29. Ra8 Bd8
30. Qb6 Be4
31. Rg1 Bxg2+
1/2-1/2

June 25, 1916 Philadelphia Inquirer Chess and Checkers

< Prev Index Next >

ChessChess 25 Jun 1916, Sun The Philadelphia Inquirer (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) Newspapers.com

The championship tournament of the Los Angeles Chess Club resulted in a victory for Stasch Mlotkowski, formerly of this city. There were fourteen entries in all and a final double round contest took place between the leaders to decide the first prize. Mlotkowski's opponents in the final round were G. A. L'Hommede, formerly of Chicago and a well-known correspondence player, and E. R. Perry, a former Harvard champion. Mlotkowski won with a score of 3 to 1, L'Hommede scored 2 to 2 and Perry 1 to 3.

David Janowski vs Frank Marshall

Frank Marshall vs David Janowski

April 09, 1916 Philadelphia Inquirer Chess and Checkers

< Prev Index Next >

ChessChess 09 Apr 1916, Sun The Philadelphia Inquirer (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) Newspapers.com

In an interesting letter that we have just received from Stasch Mlotkowski he suggests an equitable scheme for the division of a purse for an international match. Heretofore it has been the custom to divide the purse into fractions, say two-thirds for the winner and one third for the loser. Mlotkowski, however, suggests the following scheme:
Double the number of games which the winner needs to gain the match, subtract one and divide it into the purse. Give loser the result of such division for each game won and winner the balance. Thus suppose a match or eight games winner would receive a one-fifteenth of the purse for each game won or $160.63 if the purse were $2500. In this way the player far behind in a match would not lose heart, as each game he won thereafter would count and the player if ahead would not become indifferent. Each player would continue to put forth his best efforts until the final conclusion of the match.

Gustav Koehler vs Abraham Kupchik

An instructive consultation game played a few months ago at the Hampton Chess Club, England.

Ernest Busvine/James H. White (white) vs. Walter Emanuel Bonwick/W. M. Hardman (black)
Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation, Symmetrical Variation, Metger Unpin
Submitted to chessgames.com on 04/30/2025

Ernest Busvine/James H. White vs. Walter Emanuel Bonwick/W. M. Hardman, 1916

Descriptive
1. P-K4 P-K4
2. N-KB3 N-QB3
3. N-B3 N-B3
4. B-N5 B-N5
5. O-O O-O
6. P-Q3 BxN
7. PxB P-Q3
8. B-N5 Q-K2
9. R-K N-Q
10. P-Q4 N-K3
11. B-QB P-B3
12. B-B Q-B2
13. P-N3 R-K
14. B-KN2 N-B
15. Q-Q3 B-N5
16. N-Q2 QR-Q
17. P-KB4 PxBP
18. PxP B-B4
19. B-QR3 B-N3
20. P-B5 B-R4
21. Q-N3 Q-Q2
22. N-B4 P-Q4
23. P-K5 PxN
24. PxN RxRch
25. RxR P-KN3
26. B-R3 R-K
27. R-K7 Q-Q
28. Q-N5 N-Q2
29. PxP RPxP
30. B-K6 RxR
31. PxR Q-K
32. BxN QxB
33. Q-B4 Q-K
34. Q-K5 B-N5
35. Q-B6 Resigns
Algebraic
1. e4 e5
2. Nf3 Nc6
3. Nc3 Nf6
4. Bb5 Bb4
5. 0-0 0-0
6. d3 Bxc3
7. bxc3 d6
8. Bg5 Qe7
9. Re1 Nd8
10. d4 Ne6
11. Bc1 c6
12. Bf1 Qc7
13. g3 Re8
14. Bg2 Nf8
15. Qd3 Bg4
16. Nd2 Rd8
17. f4 exf4
18. gxf4 Bf5
19. Ba3 Bg6
20. f5 Bh5
21. Qg3 Qd7
22. Nc4 d5
23. e5 dxc4
24. exf6 Rxe1+
25. Rxe1 g6
26. Bh3 Re8
27. Re7 Qd8
28. Qg5 Nd7
29. fxg6 hxg6
30. Be6 Rxe7
31. fxe7 Qe8
32. Bxd7 Qxd7
33. Qf4 Qe8
34. Qe5 Bg4
35. Qf6 1-0

April 07, 1901 Chicago Tribune, Over The Chessboard, Chicago, Illinois

< Prev Index Next >

ChessChess 07 Apr 1901, Sun Chicago Tribune (Chicago, Illinois) Newspapers.com

Current Chess Topics.
Sidney P. Johnston was compelled to decline an offer to take a board in the cable match on April 19 and 20, America vs. Britain, because the offer came too late. Mr. Johnston has not played hard chess for nearly a year, and does not consider himself in good enough form to do himself or the occasion proper justice.
A London cable announces that Blackburne has declined to play on the British team this year.
“Now for a match by postal cards between Dawson City and Manila,” says the St. Paul Dispatch. A good thing as soon as express mail service by air ships (ten miles a minute) is established.
After five losses the Easterners drew the sixth game in the East vs. West match.
Dr. Paul von Seydewitz, one of the earliest members of the now famous New Orleans Chess, Checkers, and Whist club, whom Mr. Seguin describes as an eccentric but thorough gentleman of the old-time cast, is dead. He was a man of great culture and wide learning.
Here is the Sire de Legal mate again. This time it won a $5 prize for the shortest game at the Ohio Chess association meeting, Dr. Mills vs. Albert White:

Dr. Charles A. Mills (white) vs. Albert White (black)
Philidor Defense
Submitted to chessgames.com on 04/29/2025

Dr. Charles A. Mills vs. Albert White, 1901

Descriptive
1. P-K4 P-K4
2. N-KB3 P-Q3
3. B-B4 B-N5
4. N-B3 P-KR3
5. NxP BxQ
6. BxPch K-K2
7. N-K5mate
Algebraic
1. e4 e5
2. Nf3 d6
3. Bc4 Bg4
4. Nc3 h6
5. Nxe5 Bxd1
6. Bxf7+ Ke7
7. Nd5#

Why are prizes given for games without originality.
The Manhattan and Franklin Chess clubs will furnish $75 each to purchase a trophy for a series of annual team contests. The first encounter is scheduled for Memorial day at either New York or Philadelphia. Three straight wins or five in succession will secure the prize.
Emil Kemeny claims the variation by which W. E. Napier attempts to knock out the Rice gambit will not work.

No. 31—By W. Pauly, Bucharest.
White mates in two moves.
Queen's Gambit Declined.

Semyon Alapin vs Georg Marco

This is the only game lost by Alapin, and one of the four won by Marco. White here had an excellent chance to resign, but overlooked it and twenty-seven other equally good opportunities. He gave up after Marco's fifty-fourth move, when all pieces had been exchanged, and none of Marco's pawns could be stopped from queening. At the local club recently a player punished his opponent for not resigning by bishoping six pawns.
The following game has an interesting ending, in which Janowski must exercise great care to win:

Jacques Mieses vs David Janowski

Frank Marshall vs Arturo Reggio

Frank Marshall vs David Janowski

and wins. Marshall's original treatment of the opening is certainly no improvement on book lines, and its weak points are quickly exposed by the Frenchman.

Arturo Reggio vs Carl Schlechter

Black won after fifty-five moves, but the game may be dismissed here, as the extra pawn must win with proper play.

Jacques Mieses vs Isidor Gunsberg

Drawn by perpetual check. Mieses might have improved his chances by 20. QR4ch first and 21. QR4ch, thereby hampering Black's defensive maneuvers somewhat.

Semyon Alapin vs Mikhail Chigorin

Tschigorin is the only master who considers it safe to defend this opening by 2. N-QB3. His brilliant combination beginning with 22. N-B4, unfortunately, would not yield more than a draw. Black obtained a splendid free opening.

January 30, 1916 Philadelphia Inquirer Chess and Checkers

< Prev Index Next >

ChessChess 30 Jan 1916, Sun The Philadelphia Inquirer (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) Newspapers.com

Problem No. 1063
By Stasch Mlotkowski
White to play and mate in three moves.

FEN 8/4p1r1/1R2PPk1/1K6/5BP1/2PP4/8/Q7 w - - 0 1
Solution: 1. Qa8 exf6 2. Qe4+ f5 3. Qxf5#

Jose Raul Capablanca vs Roy Black

The following game was played in one of the matches of the Metropolitan League. The game is of special interest on account of White's unusual continuation of the attack against the Petroff Defense with his fifth move of N-B3 before advancing his Queen's Pawn.

Borislav Kostic (white) vs. Roy Black (black)
Petrov's Defense: Nimzowitsch Attack
Submitted to chessgames.com on 04/30/2025

Borislav Kostic vs. Roy Black

Descriptive
1. P-K4 P-K4
2. N-KB3 N-KB3
3. NxP P-Q3
4. N-KB3 NxP
5. N-B3 NxN
6. QPxN N-B3
7. B-Q3 B-N5
8. P-KR3 B-R4
9. B-K3 B-K2
10. P-KN4 B-N3
11. Q-Q2 Q-Q2
12. O-O-O BxB
13. QxB O-O-O
14. N-Q4 N-K4
15. Q-B5 P-KN3
16. QxQch RxQ
17. P-KB4 N-B5
18. B-B2 P-Q4
19. N-B3 B-Q3
20. B-N3 P-KR4
21. N-K5 BxN
22. PxB PxP
23. PxP RxR
24. RxR R-K2
25. R-K K-Q2
26. P-N3 N-N3
27. R-B K-K
28. R-R P-QB4
29. K-Q2 N-B
30. K-Q3 R-K3
31. R-R8ch K-Q2
32. R-B8 R-K2
33. P-QB4 N-N3
34. PxP NxP
35. P-B4 N-N5ch
36. K-K4 NxP
37. B-R4 N-B6ch
38. K-Q3 P-KN4
39. BxP RxP
40. B-B6 1-0
Algebraic
1. e4 e5
2. Nf3 Nf6
3. Nxe5 d6
4. Nf3 Nxe4
5. Nc3 Nxc3
6. dxc3 Nc6
7. Bd3 Bg4
8. h3 Bh5
9. Be3 Be7
10. g4 Bg6
11. Qd2 Qd7
12. 0-0-0 Bxd3
13. Qxd3 0-0-0
14. Nd4 Ne5
15. Qf5 g6
16. Qxd7+ Rxd7
17. f4 Nc4
18. Bf2 d5
19. Nf3 Bd6
20. Bg3 h5
21. Ne5 Bxe5
22. fxe5 hxg4
23. hxg4 Rxh1
24. Rxh1 Re7
25. Re1 Kd7
26. b3 Nb6
27. Rf1 Ke8
28. Rh1 c5
29. Kd2 Nc8
30. Kd3 Re6
31. Rh8+ Kd7
32. Rf8 Re7
33. c4 Nb6
34. cxd5 Nxd5
35. c4 Nb4+
36. Ke4 Nxa2
37. Bh4 Nc3+
38. Kd3 g5
39. Bxg5 Rxe5
40. Bf6 1-0

October 31, 1915 Philadelphia Inquirer Chess and Checkers

< Prev Index Next >

ChessChess 31 Oct 1915, Sun The Philadelphia Inquirer (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) Newspapers.com

The British Chess Magazine of October, 1915, publishes interesting analysis of the Greco Counter Gambit by S. Mlotkowski. This defense has not hitherto met with favor from the masters, but Mlotkowski is of the opinion that it is quite tenable and yields Black a fair defense.

The following game was played at Los Angeles, Cal., recently. It is an interesting contest, P. E. Greer reviving an antiquated defense to the Gambit, but is not successful. Black undoubtedly relied on his seventh move of P-Q4, the continuation after this move not being fully analyzed in the books.

(a) An old but inferior defense. Nevertheless White must play with accuracy to maintain his attack.
(b) Steinitz now recommended, 6. Q-B3 and adopted the line of play in several of his games. The variation, however, does not yield Black a satisfactory defense.
(c) 7. N-R4 at once yields White the advantage by the following line of play, 8. BxPch K-B; 9. Q-R4 KxB; l0. QxN, etc.
(d) Why not Q-Q3ch (?).

Stasch Mlotkowski (white) vs. Paul Ecoff Greer (black)
Italian Game: Evans Gambit, Anderssen Variation
Submitted to chessgames.com on 04/25/2025

Stasch Mlotkowski vs. Paul Ecoff Greer, 1915

Descriptive
1. P-K4 P-K4
2. N-KB3 N-QB3
3. B-B4 B-B4
4. P-QN4 BxNP
5. P-B3 B-K2
6. P-Q4 PxP
7. Q-N3 P-Q4
8. BxP N-R4
9. BxPch K-B1
10. Q-R4 P-B3
11. BxN RxB
12. PxP P-QN4
13. Q-B2 N-B5
14. O-O P-KR3
15. QN-Q2 NxN
16. BxN Q-N3
17. P-Q5 PxP
18. PxP K-B2
19. N-K5ch K-B3
20. Q-N6ch KxN
21. B-B3ch KxP
22. KR-Q1ch K-B5
23. Q-K4ch KxB
24. R(R)-B1ch K-N7
25. R-Q2ch KxR
26. Q-B2mate
Algebraic
1. e4 e5
2. Nf3 Nc6
3. Bc4 Bc5
4. b4 Bxb4
5. c3 Be7
6. d4 exd4
7. Qb3 d5
8. Bxd5 Na5
9. Bxf7+ Kf8
10. Qa4 c6
11. Bxg8 Rxg8
12. cxd4 b5
13. Qc2 Nc4
14. 0-0 h6
15. Nd2 Nxd2
16. Bxd2 Qb6
17. d5 cxd5
18. exd5 Kf7
19. Ne5+ Kf6
20. Qg6+ Kxe5
21. Bc3+ Kxd5
22. Rfd1+ Kc4
23. Qe4+ Kxc3
24. Rc1+ Kb2
25. Rd2+ Kxc1
26. Qc2#

The following game was the outcome of a correspondence game between these two players and was to contest a variation which did not take place in the correspondence play. Black adopts the old defense in the Petroff of 6-BK2 in place of the more popular one at present of B-Q3.

H. E. Waters (white) vs. Dr. G. C. Arata (black)
Petrov's Defense: Classical Attack, Mason Variation
Submitted to chessgames.com on 04/29/2025

H. E. Waters vs. Dr. G. C. Arata, 1915

Descriptive
1. P-K4 P-K4
2. N-KB3 N-KB3
3. NxP P-Q3
4. N-KB3 NxP
5. P-Q4 P-Q4
6. B-Q3 B-K2
7. O-O O-O
8. P-B4 P-QB3
9. Q-B2 P-KB4
10. N-K5 Q-N3
11. B-K3 B-B3
12. P-B5 Q-B2
13. P-B4 P-QN4
14. N-Q2 N-R3
15. Q-N3 R-N
16. NxN PxN
17. BxKP Q-N2
18. NxP K-R
19. NxR PxB
20. NxN QxN
21. P-QR4 PxP
22. RxP Q-K7
23. P-Q5 B-R3
24. KR-R B-QN4
25. RxP B-Q6
26. B-B2 P-K6
27. BxP QxBch
28. K-R Q-K7
29. R-R8 B-Q
30. Q-N6 B-K5
31. R-KN BxPch
1/2-1/2
Algebraic
1. e4 e5
2. Nf3 Nf6
3. Nxe5 d6
4. Nf3 Nxe4
5. d4 d5
6. Bd3 Be7
7. 0-0 0-0
8. c4 c6
9. Qc2 f5
10. Ne5 Qb6
11. Be3 Bf6
12. c5 Qc7
13. f4 b5
14. Nd2 Na6
15. Qb3 Rb8
16. Nxe4 fxe4
17. Bxe4 Qb7
18. Nxc6 Kh8
19. Nxb8 dxe4
20. Nxa6 Qxa6
21. a4 bxa4
22. Rxa4 Qe2
23. d5 Ba6
24. Ra1 Bb5
25. Rxa7 Bd3
26. Bf2 e3
27. Bxe3 Qxe3+
28. Kh1 Qe2
29. Ra8 Bd8
30. Qb6 Be4
31. Rg1 Bxg2+
1/2-1/2

October 24, 1915 Philadelphia Inquirer Chess and Checkers

< Prev Index Next >

ChessChess 24 Oct 1915, Sun The Philadelphia Inquirer (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) Newspapers.com

The annual Telegraphic Chess Match between San Francisco and Los Angeles was contested on fifteen boards. The match was won by the San Francisco players. 9½-5½. S. Mlotkowski, formerly of Philadelphia, played on the first board for Los Angeles. The game resulted in draw.

The following exceptionally fine game was played by correspondence in the Pennsylvania State Correspondence Tournament by two of the greatest correspondence players in this country, Mordecai Morgan, of Philadelphia, and J. E. Narraway, of Ottawa, Canada. The game is of special interest on account of the sacrifice on the part of Morgan in the early game. So far as we know, this is entirely a new idea worked out by this able player. Against a less formidable opponent, the sacrifice would have undoubtedly won. The defense is extremely difficult and Black deserves great credit for finally scoring the game. Morgan is of the opinion that the attack could have been slightly strengthened, and states he would be quite willing to risk the same sacrifice in another game. It is impossible to properly annotate this game. We must leave the study of the many combinations involved to our readers.

Mordecai Morgan vs James Narraway

The following instructive game in the Vienna opening was played by correspondence in the Burnside Tournament. E. S. Maguire is a well-known Philadelphia player, while Paul J. Wortman is a noted correspondence expert residing at Dayton, O.

Ernest Scott Maguire (white) vs. Paul J. Wortman (black)
Vienna Game: Vienna Gambit, Bardeleben Variation
Submitted to chessgames.com on 04/28/2025

Ernest Scott Maguire vs. Paul J. Wortman

Descriptive
1. P-K4 P-K4
2. N-QB3 N-KB3
3. P-B4 P-Q4
4. PxKP NxP
5. Q-B3 P-KB4
6. N-R3 QN-QB3
7. B-N5 B-B4
8. QN-K2 Q-R5ch
9. K-B B-Q2
10. BxN BxB
11. P-Q4 B-N3
12. N(R3)-B4 O-O
13. P-Kn3 Q-K2
14. P-QR4 P-QR4
15. P-QB3 B-Q2
16. P-KR4 P-QB4
17. NxP Q-K3
18. N-B4 Q-R3
19. P-K6 B-B3
20. N-K7ch K-R
21. P-Q5 Q-B3
22. P-KR5 QxN
23. N-N6ch Resigns
Algebraic
1. e4 e5
2. Nc3 Nf6
3. f4 d5
4. fxe5 Nxe4
5. Qf3 f5
6. Nh3 Nc6
7. Bb5 Bc5
8. Ne2 Qh4+
9. Kf1 Bd7
10. Bxc6 Bxc6
11. d4 Bb6
12. Nhf4 0-0
13. g3 Qe7
14. a4 a5
15. c3 Bd7
16. h4 c5
17. Nxd5 Qe6
18. Nf4 Qh6
19. e6 Bc6
20. Ne7+ Kh8
21. d5 Qf6
22. h5 Qxe7
23. Ng6+ 1-0

June 14, 1903 The People, Chess by T. F. Lawrence, London, England

< Prev Index Next >

ChessChess 14 Jun 1903, Sun The Sunday People (London, London, England) Newspapers.com The Sunday People, London, London, England, Sunday, June 14, 1903

Game Played In The Vienna Gambit Tournament.

Geza Maroczy vs Mikhail Chigorin
Vienna (1903), Vienna AUH, rd 3, May-05
King's Gambit: Accepted. MacDonnell Gambit (C37) 1-0

Geza Maroczy vs Mikhail Chigorin

Descriptive
1. P-K4 P-K4
2. P-KB4 PxP
3. N-KB3 P-KN4
4. B-B4 P-N5
5. N-B3 PxN
6. QxP P-Q3
7. P-Q4 B-K3
8. N-Q5 P-QB3
9. O-O PxN
10. PxP B-B4
11. BxP B-N3
12. B-N5ch N-Q2
13. QR-Kch B-K2
14. BxP K-B
15. RxB NxR
16. R-K K-N2
17. BxN Q-R4
18. Q-K2 N-B
19. B-B6ch K-N
20. Q-K5 P-KR3
21. BxR P-B3
22. Q-K7 KxB
23. QxPch Resigns
Algebraic
1. e4 e5
2. f4 exf4
3. Nf3 g5
4. Bc4 g4
5. Nc3 gxf3
6. Qxf3 d6
7. d4 Be6
8. Nd5 c6
9. 0-0 cxd5
10. exd5 Bf5
11. Bxf4 Bg6
12. Bb5+ Nd7
13. Re1+ Be7
14. Bxd6 Kf8
15. Rxe7 Nxe7
16. Re1 Kg7
17. Bxe7 Qa5
18. Qe2 Nf8
19. Bf6+ Kg8
20. Qe5 h6
21. Bxh8 f6
22. Qe7 Kxh8
23. Qxf6+ 1-0

February 07, 1915, Courier-Journal, Chess by Emanuel Lasker, Louisville, Kentucky

< Prev Index Next >

ChessChess 07 Feb 1915, Sun The Courier-Journal (Louisville, Kentucky) Newspapers.com

OVER THE CHESS BOARD
French Championship Won By M. A. Goetz Just Before the War—One of His Victories.

By Emanuel Lasker.

The French chess championship was decided just before the mobilization for the war was ordered. M. A. Goetz winning with the good score of ten out of a possible eleven games. He did not lose a game, two being drawn. Following is one of his victories.

Alphonse Goetz (white) vs. Amedee Gibaud (black)
Ruy Lopez: Open, Motzko Attack
Submitted to chessgames.com on 04/27/2025

Alphonse Goetz vs. Amedee Gibaud, 1914

Descriptive
1. P-K4 P-K4
2. N-KB3 N-QB3
3. B-N5 P-QR3
4. B-R4 N-B3
5. O-O NxP
6. P-Q4 P-QN4
7. B-N3 P-Q4
8. PxP B-K3
9. P-B3 B-QB4
10. Q-Q3 B-N3
11. B-K3 N-B4
12. BxN BxB
13. P-QR4 P-N5
14. QN-Q2 O-O
15. QR-K R-K
16. N-Q4 NxN 
17. PxN B-KB
18. P-B4 P-N3
19. N-B3 B-R3
20. Q-K3 P-QR4
21. P-R3 R-QB
22. R-B B-B
23. K-R2 Q-Q2
24. P-N4 P-QB4
25. PxP Q-R2
26. Q-Q3 RxP
27. RxR BxR
28. P-B5 PxP
29. PxP B-QB
30. BxP B-R3
31. B-B4 BxB
32. QxB Q-B2
33. R-B R-QB
34. Q-R4 Q-Q2
35. Q-N4ch K-B
36. P-B6 QxQ
37. PxQ R-B2
38. P-N3 K-K
39. N-N5 P-R3
40. N-K4 B-Q5
41. N-Q6ch K-Q
42. RxR BxPch
43. K-N2 KxR
44. NxP BxP
45. NxP K-B3
46. K-B3 K-Q4
47. N-B5 B-N4
48. K-K2 B-B5
49. K-Q3 B-B2
50. N-K3ch K-K4
51. K-B4 K-K5
52. N-Q5 B-Q
53. K-B5 K-Q6
54. K-N5 K-Q5
55. NxP PxN
56. P-R5 B-K2
57. P-R6 B-B4
58. P-N5 Resigns
Algebraic
1. e4 e5
2. Nf3 Nc6
3. Bb5 a6
4. Ba4 Nf6
5. 0-0 Nxe4
6. d4 b5
7. Bb3 d5
8. dxe5 Be6
9. c3 Bc5
10. Qd3 Bb6
11. Be3 Nc5
12. Bxc5 Bxc5
13. a4 b4
14. Nd2 0-0
15. Re1 Re8
16. Nd4 Nxd4
17. cxd4 Bf8
18. f4 g6
19. Nf3 Bh6
20. Qe3 a5
21. h3 Rc8
22. Rc1 Bf8
23. Kh2 Qd7
24. g4 c5
25. dxc5 Qa7
26. Qd3 Rxc5
27. Rxc5 Bxc5
28. f5 gxf5
29. gxf5 Bc8
30. Bxd5 Ba6
31. Bc4 Bxc4
32. Qxc4 Qc7
33. Rc1 Rc8
34. Qh4 Qd7
35. Qg4+ Kf8
36. f6 Qxg4
37. hxg4 Rc7
38. b3 Ke8
39. Ng5 h6
40. Ne4 Bd4
41. Nd6+ Kd8
42. Rxc7 Bxe5+
43. Kg2 Kxc7
44. Nxf7 Bxf6
45. Nxh6 Kc6
46. Kf3 Kd5
47. Nf5 Bg5
48. Ke2 Bf4
49. Kd3 Bc7
50. Ne3+ Ke5
51. Kc4 Ke4
52. Nd5 Bd8
53. Kc5 Kd3
54. Kb5 Kd4
55. Nxb4 axb4
56. a5 Be7
57. a6 Bc5
58. g5 1-0

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O Nxe4 6. d4 b5 7. Bb3 d5 8. dxe5 Be6 9. c3 Bc5
Prior to the Petrograd tournament opinions regarding the relative merit of this move and B-K2 were about equally divided, but after that tournament B-K2 was preferred. The game between Lasker and Tarrasch was continued as follows 9. ..., B-K2; 10. QN-Q2, Castles; 11. R-K, N-B4; 12. B-B2, P-Q5; and Black was in a good position.
10. Qd3
Leads to interesting complications, but involves a trap, and its value is doubtful.
10. …Bb6 11. Be3 Nc5 12. Bxc5 Bxc5 13. a4 b4 14. Nbd2 O-O 15. Rae1 Re8 16. Nd4 Nxd4
Almost forced, as it would have been dangerous to leave the white knight in its dominating position at Q4.
17. cxd4 Bf8
B-N3 was the alternative, black having to choose between withdrawing his bishop to KB square, where it would defend the king against the threatened attack by P-B4, in which case his queen’s bishop’s pawn would be left weak; or of playing it to N3, where it would be of no assistance in defending the king’s side.
18. f4 g6 19. Nf3 Bh6
Loss of time. The bishop must return later to B square to guard the weak point at QB4. P-QB4 getting rid of the weak queen’s bishop’s pawn, would have been better, although, after the exchange of pawns, the queen’s pawn would have been isolated and open to attack.
20. Qe3 a5 21. h3
Preparing the attack by the advance of the king’s side pawns.
21. … Rc8 22. Rc1 Bf8 23. Kh2 Qd7 24. g4 c5
A desperate attempt to relieve his cramped position and dispose of the weakness of his queen’s bishop’s file by the temporary sacrifice of a pawn, but it leads only to further disaster. P-QB3, followed by R-B2, would have permitted him to hold out longer. He could not play 24. … P-KB4, because of PxP e.p., RxP; 26. N-K5 (threatening PxB), B-KB4; 27. Q-KB3 with a winning position for White.
25. dxc5 Qa7 26. Qd3
Threatening P-KB5 and also to retain the queen’s bishop’s pawn by advancing it to B6.
26. … Rxc5 27. Rxc5 Bxc5 28. f5 gxf5 29. gxf5 Bc8 30. Bxd5 Ba6 31. Bc4 Bxc4 32. Qxc4 Qc7
R-QB would have been better, as White could not then have replied with 33. R-QB, because of 33. ... B-N8ch; 34. RxBch, QxRch; 35. KxQ RxQ; but White had other good moves at his disposal, and being a pawn ahead with the better position would, no doubt, have won just the same.
33. Rc1 Rc8 34. Qh4 Qd7 35. Qg4+ Kf8 36. f6 Qxg4 37. hxg4 Rc7 38. b3 Ke8 39. Ng5 h6 40. Ne4
Probably overlooking his opponent’s clever reply.
40. … Bd4 41. Nd6+ Kd8 42. Rxc7 Bxe5+ 43. Kg2 Kxc7 44. Nxf7 Bxf6 45. Nxh6
An instructive end game now ensues.
45. …Kc6 46. Kf3 Kd5 47. Nf5 Bg5 48. Ke2 Bf4
Not 48. ... K-K5; because of 49. N-Q6ch, K-B5; 50. N-K5, and both black pawns fall.
49. Kd3 Bc7 50. Ne3+ Ke5 51. Kc4 Ke4 52. Nd5 Bd8 53. Kc5 Kd3 54. Kb5 Kd4
If 54. ... K-B7, White wins easily by sacrificing his knight for the two pawns.
55. Nxb4 axb4 56. a5 Be7 57. a6 Bc5 58. g5 1-0

December 05, 1915 The People, Chess by T. F. Lawrence, London, England

< Prev Index Next >

ChessChess 05 Dec 1915, Sun The Sunday People (London, London, England) Newspapers.com

CHESS.
[By T. F. LAWRENCE.]

Chess has ever enjoyed great popularity in Holland, and of late years has made great strides there, until now the country of dykes and canals counts relatively more players of over-average amateur strength than any of its bulkier neighbours. Recently a 39-board match was played at Amsterdam between the Hague Chess Club and the United Amsterdam Association, resulting in the victory of Amsterdam by 20 games to 19. A narrow margin. Apart from the purely native variety, arrangements have been made by the British Chess Federation to stimulate the game among the involuntary residents at Groningen, and a shield is being offered for competition among the battalions of the Royal Naval Brigade there interned. In the B Division of the London Chess League, West London beat Sydenham by 8½ to 3½; Hampstead beat Metropolitan by 8 to 4, and Toynbee by 9 to 3; Brixton beat Sydenham by 9 to 3; Toynbee beat Lee by 8 to 4: Lee beat Islington by 8½ to 3½; and Metropolitan beat Islington by 10½ to is 1½.
It is proposed to hold a great international tournament at Havana during the coming year, but no date or details have yet been fixed.

CHESS IN FRANCE.
Played a few days before the outbreak of war in the National Tournament at Lyons.
RUY LOPEZ OPENING.

Alphonse Goetz (white) vs. Amedee Gibaud (black)
Ruy Lopez: Open, Motzko Attack
Submitted to chessgames.com on 04/27/2025

Alphonse Goetz vs. Amedee Gibaud, 1914

Descriptive
1. P-K4 P-K4
2. N-KB3 N-QB3
3. B-N5 P-QR3
4. B-R4 N-B3
5. O-O NxP
6. P-Q4 P-QN4
7. B-N3 P-Q4
8. PxP B-K3
9. P-B3 B-QB4
10. Q-Q3 B-N3
11. B-K3 N-B4
12. BxN BxB
13. P-QR4 P-N5
14. QN-Q2 O-O
15. QR-K R-K
16. N-Q4 NxN 
17. PxN B-KB
18. P-B4 P-N3
19. N-B3 B-R3
20. Q-K3 P-QR4
21. P-R3 R-QB
22. R-B B-B
23. K-R2 Q-Q2
24. P-N4 P-QB4
25. PxP Q-R2
26. Q-Q3 RxP
27. RxR BxR
28. P-B5 PxP
29. PxP B-QB
30. BxP B-R3
31. B-B4 BxB
32. QxB Q-B2
33. R-B R-QB
34. Q-R4 Q-Q2
35. Q-N4ch K-B
36. P-B6 QxQ
37. PxQ R-B2
38. P-N3 K-K
39. N-N5 P-R3
40. N-K4 B-Q5
41. N-Q6ch K-Q
42. RxR BxPch
43. K-N2 KxR
44. NxP BxP
45. NxP K-B3
46. K-B3 K-Q4
47. N-B5 B-N4
48. K-K2 B-B5
49. K-Q3 B-B2
50. N-K3ch K-K4
51. K-B4 K-K5
52. N-Q5 B-Q
53. K-B5 K-Q6
54. K-N5 K-Q5
55. NxP PxN
56. P-R5 B-K2
57. P-R6 B-B4
58. P-N5 Resigns
Algebraic
1. e4 e5
2. Nf3 Nc6
3. Bb5 a6
4. Ba4 Nf6
5. 0-0 Nxe4
6. d4 b5
7. Bb3 d5
8. dxe5 Be6
9. c3 Bc5
10. Qd3 Bb6
11. Be3 Nc5
12. Bxc5 Bxc5
13. a4 b4
14. Nd2 0-0
15. Re1 Re8
16. Nd4 Nxd4
17. cxd4 Bf8
18. f4 g6
19. Nf3 Bh6
20. Qe3 a5
21. h3 Rc8
22. Rc1 Bf8
23. Kh2 Qd7
24. g4 c5
25. dxc5 Qa7
26. Qd3 Rxc5
27. Rxc5 Bxc5
28. f5 gxf5
29. gxf5 Bc8
30. Bxd5 Ba6
31. Bc4 Bxc4
32. Qxc4 Qc7
33. Rc1 Rc8
34. Qh4 Qd7
35. Qg4+ Kf8
36. f6 Qxg4
37. hxg4 Rc7
38. b3 Ke8
39. Ng5 h6
40. Ne4 Bd4
41. Nd6+ Kd8
42. Rxc7 Bxe5+
43. Kg2 Kxc7
44. Nxf7 Bxf6
45. Nxh6 Kc6
46. Kf3 Kd5
47. Nf5 Bg5
48. Ke2 Bf4
49. Kd3 Bc7
50. Ne3+ Ke5
51. Kc4 Ke4
52. Nd5 Bd8
53. Kc5 Kd3
54. Kb5 Kd4
55. Nxb4 axb4
56. a5 Be7
57. a6 Bc5
58. g5 1-0

Recommended Books

Understanding Chess by William Lombardy Chess Duels, My Games with the World Champions, by Yasser Seirawan No Regrets: Fischer-Spassky 1992, by Yasser Seirawan Chess Fundamentals, by Jose Capablanca Bobby Fischer Teaches Chess, by Bobby Fischer My 60 Memorable Games, by Bobby Fischer Bobby Fischer Games of Chess, by Bobby Fischer The Modern Chess Self Tutor, by David Bronstein Russians versus Fischer, by Mikhail Tal, Plisetsky, Taimanov, et al

'til the world understands why Robert J. Fischer criticised the U.S./British and Russian military industry imperial alliance and their own Israeli Apartheid. Sarah Wilkinson explains:

Bobby Fischer, First Amendment, Freedom of Speech
What a sad story Fischer was,” typed a racist, pro-imperialist colonial troll who supports mega-corporation entities over human rights, police state policies & white supremacy.
To which I replied: “Really? I think he [Bob Fischer] stood up to the broken system of corruption and raised awareness! Whether on the Palestinian/Israel-British-U.S. Imperial Apartheid scam, the Bush wars of ‘7 countries in 5 years,’ illegally, unconstitutionally which constituted mass xenocide or his run in with police brutality in Pasadena, California-- right here in the U.S., police run rampant over the Constitution of the U.S., on oath they swore to uphold, but when Americans don't know the law, and the cops either don't know or worse, “don't care” -- then I think that's pretty darn “sad”. I think Mr. Fischer held out and fought the good fight, steadfast til the day he died, and may he Rest In Peace.
Educate yourself about U.S./State Laws --
https://www.youtube.com/@AuditTheAudit/videos
After which the troll posted a string of profanities, confirming there was never any genuine sentiment of “compassion” for Mr. Fischer, rather an intent to inflict further defamatory remarks.

This ongoing work is a tribute to the life and accomplishments of Robert “Bobby” Fischer who passionately loved and studied chess history. May his life continue to inspire many other future generations of chess enthusiasts and kibitzers, alike.

Robert J. Fischer, Kid Chess Wizard 1956March 9, 1943 - January 17, 2008

The photograph of Bobby Fischer (above) from the March 02, 1956 The Tampa Times was discovered by Sharon Mooney (Bobby Fischer Newspaper Archive editor) on February 01, 2018 while gathering research materials for this ongoing newspaper archive project. Along with lost games now being translated into Algebraic notation and extractions from over two centuries of newspapers, it is but one of the many lost treasures to be found in the pages of old newspapers since our social media presence was first established November 11, 2017.

Special Thanks