The Gift of Chess

Notice to commercial publishers seeking use of images from this collection of chess-related archive blogs. For use of the many large color restorations, two conditions must be met: 1) It is YOUR responsibility to obtain written permissions for use from the current holders of rights over the original b/w photo. Then, 2) make a tax-deductible donation to The Gift of Chess in honor of Robert J. Fischer-Newspaper Archives. A donation in the amount of $250 USD or greater is requested for images above 2000 pixels and other special request items. For small images, such as for fair use on personal blogs, all credits must remain intact and a donation is still requested but negotiable. Please direct any photographs for restoration and special request (for best results, scanned and submitted at their highest possible resolution), including any additional questions to S. Mooney, at bobbynewspaperblogs•gmail. As highlighted in the ABC News feature, chess has numerous benefits for individuals, including enhancing critical thinking and problem-solving skills, improving concentration and memory, and promoting social interaction and community building. Initiatives like The Gift of Chess have the potential to bring these benefits to a wider audience, particularly in areas where access to educational and recreational resources is limited.

Best of Chess Fischer Newspaper Archives
• Robert J. Fischer, 1955 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1956 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1957 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1958 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1959 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1960 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1961 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1962 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1963 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1964 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1965 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1966 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1967 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1968 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1969 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1970 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1971 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1972 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1973 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1974 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1975 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1976 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1977 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1978 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1979 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1980 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1981 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1982 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1983 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1984 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1985 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1986 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1987 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1988 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1989 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1990 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1991 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1992 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1993 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1994 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1995 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1996 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1997 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1998 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1999 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 2000 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 2001 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 2002 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 2003 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 2004 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 2005 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 2006 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 2007 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 2008 ➦
Chess Columns
Chessgames.com: Newspaper Chess Games Archive Chess.com: Newspaper Chess Games Archive Facebook: Bobby Fischer History Youtube: Newspaper Chess Games Archive My Life Notes lichess.org: Analyze Chess Game lichess.org: Board Editor Chess Notation Converter Chess.com: Chess Board Analysis Notes

March 06, 1904 San Francisco Chronicle, Chess, San Francisco, California

< Prev Index Next >

ChessChess 06 Mar 1904, Sun San Francisco Chronicle (San Francisco, California) Newspapers.com

Max Judd, the St. Louis chess master, was able to prolong his stay in San Francisco until last Thursday, and consequently the local chess players had an opportunity to see more of the genial and talented expert.
On Sunday afternoon last he contested two games with Oscar Samuels at the rooms of the Mechanics' Institute Chess Club, and both were drawn. The first game was stubbornly contested and lasted nearly five hours. Tuesday night Mr. Judd availed himself of another opportunity to meet Dr. W. R. Lovegrove, the local champion. The contest took place at the rooms of Dr. Benjamin Marshall and three games were played. The first game went to Dr. Lovegrove, who forced his adversary to resign after eighteen moves. The ending was quite a pretty one. The other two games were won by Mr. Judd. The score of the first and third games are appended.
In the first encounter between these two exponents Dr. Lovegrove scored four games to Max Judd's one. The total score of the two contests stands in favor of the local expert, 5 to 3.
Wednesday night Max Judd entertained the members of the Mechanics' Institute Chess Club with a simultaneous exhibition. He was opposed by six strong players and Howe was the only player to win his game. The record is as follows:
Ott, Lost.
Jones, Lost.
Griffin, Lost.
Howe, Won.
Nevill, Drawn.
Dr. Franklin's game was unfinished with a difficult but possible win.

Max Judd (white) vs. Dr. W. R. Lovegrove (black)

Unresolved Chess Game
Unresolved Chess Game: Can you solve it?

Descriptive
1. P-K4 P-K4
2. B-B4 N-KB3
3. P-Q4 N-QB3
4. P-Q5 N-K3
5. N-QB3 N-KN3
6. B-K3 B-QN5
7. Q-KB3 P-Q3
8. P-KR3 N-KR
9. Q-KN3 NxKP
10. QxKNP Q-KB3
11. QxQ NxKNPch
12. K-K2 NxQ
13. R-KN5 N-KR4
14. KxK4 QN-B5ch
15. K-B3 P-KB4
16. N-KB6ch NxN
17. BxN R-KN1
18. B-KR4 B-Q7
0-1
Algebraic
1. e4 e5
2. Bc4 Nf6
3. d4 Nc6
4. d5 Ng8
5. Nc3 Nf6
6. Be3 Bb4
7. Qf3 d6
8. h3 Nh5
9. Qg3

Max Judd (white) vs. Dr. W. R. Lovegrove (black)

Unresolved Chess Game
Unresolved Chess Game: Can you solve it?

Descriptive
1. P-K4 P-K4
2. N-KB3 N-QB3
3. B-QN5 N-KB3
4. O-O NxP
5. P-Q4 B-K2
6. Q-K2 N-Q3
7. BxN NPxB
8. PxP N-N2
9. N-QB3 O-O
10. N-Q4 N-QB4
11. R-K1 N-K3
12. B-K3 Q-N
13. N-KB5 P-KB3
14. NxB QxN
15. PxP QxP
16. QR-Q1 P-Q4
17. Q-Q3 B-Q2
18. B-Q4 NxB
19. QxN B-KB4
20. QxQ RxQ
21. R-Q2 K-B2
22. QR-K2 R-K3
23. RxR BxR
24. N-QR4 P-QR4
25. P-KB3 B-B4
26. P-QB3 R-QN1
27. K-B2 P-QB4
28. R-K5 B-Q2
29. NxQBP RxPch
30. R-K2 RxRch
31. KxR K-K2
32. K-K3 B-QB3
33. K-Q4 K-Q3
34. P-KR4 P-QR5
35. P-QR3 B-N4
36. P-KN3 P-KR4
37. N-QN7ch K-QB3
38. N-Q8ch K-Q2
39. N-KB7 K-K2
40. K-QB5 B-K7
41. N-N5 B-QB5
42. N-KR3 K-KB3
43. N-KB4 P-KN4
44. NxQP BxN
45. PxPch KxP
46. KxB Resigns
Algebraic
1. e4 e5
2. Nf3 Nc6
3. Bb5 Nf6
4. 0-0 Nxe4
5. d4 Be7
6. Qe2 Nd6
7. Bxc6 bxc6
8. dxe5 Nb7
9. Nc3 0-0
10. Nd4 Nc5
11. Re1 Ne6
12. Be3 Qe8
13. Nf5 f6

February 28, 1904 San Francisco Chronicle, Chess, San Francisco, California

< Prev Index Next >

ChessChess 28 Feb 1904, Sun San Francisco Chronicle (San Francisco, California) Newspapers.com

CHESS

MAX JUDD of St. Louis, one of the best known chess masters in America, is in San Francisco for a short visit and is staying at the Palace. His arrival here as soon as it became known created much interest among the local fraternity and no time was lost in making the acquaintance of the distinguished exponent of the royal game.
Mr. Judd has met only two of local experts in over the board play, so far, in serious play. One game was Oscar Samuels, at the rooms of the Mechanics' Institute Chess Club, which was warmly contested on both sides, Mr. Judd coming off victor. The other occasion was at the rooms of Dr. Benjamin Marshall Friday evening last, when he met Dr. W. R. Lovegrove, the local champion. Five games were played, of which Dr. Lovegrove scored four. It was evident, however, that Mr. Judd was very much out of form owing to fatigue of traveling and the stress of very important business engagements.
He gave Dr. Lovegrove great credit for the very able manner in which he contested his games, and expressed the hope that he would represent California in the great chess tournaments to be held at the World's Exposition, St. Louis, which are scheduled to take place next October, predicting a fine record for him if he did.
The games played Friday evening were mostly Ruy Lopez openings, with Fianchetto defense on Mr. Judd's part.
It is a matter of regret on all sides Mr. Judd's stay here is to be limited, as he leaves here on Sunday, for there is no doubt that a few days' rest would enable him to get in better form and leave a brilliant record behind him. He has been here several days, but was unable to get en rapport with any of our players until Friday afternoon.
Mr. Judd was surprised at the great interest manifested in chess in this city, as well as at the skill of its players, which considered far above the average in cities of this class, placing us second or third, not excepting Boston or Philadelphia. New York, of course, comes first, followed by Chicago as a close second.
Mr. Judd is a resident of St. Louis and will have charge of the world's chess interest at the great exposition to be held there this fall. He thinks that California will do herself credit if she can send such representatives as Dr. Lovegrove, Mr. Manson, Dr. Franklin, etc. The board owned by Dr. Marshall, upon which the games were played, has become famous from the fact that it has been played upon by many of the greatest players of the world, such as Dr. Lasker, Hilderbrand, Max Judd, Von der Lasa, Zukertort, Schowalter, Von Shere, Van Vliet, Redding, etc.
Max Judd, who under the Cleveland administration was United States Consul-General at Vienna, has a chess record that one could be proud of. He at one time champion of America, and the title passed to Showalter in 1888. Two matches were played by these two players; the first was won by Judd, 7 to 3, and the second one by Showalter, 7 to 4.
Mr. Judd's first success was his winning of the chess championship of Ohio at Cincinnati, in 1872. Later, in 1876, he took part in tournament the Centennial chess masters' tournament at Philadelphia. James Mason finished first, Judd second and Bird third.
He also took part in the sixth American Chess Congress, held at New York in 1888, and played a match with Captain Mackenzie, who was at the time considered the strongest player in the United States. Out of the twelve games played Mackenzie won 7 and Judd 5.
In November last Mr. Judd captured the championship of the Western Chess Association, and quite recently won the contest at St. Louis involving possession of the Brown Memorial cup.

Max Judd (white) vs. Dr. Walter Roland Lovegrove (black)
Scotch Game: Schmidt Variation
Submitted to chessgames.com on 05/12/2025

Max Judd vs. Dr. Walter Ronald Lovegrove, 1904

Descriptive
1. P-K4 P-K4
2. N-KB3 N-QB3
3. P-Q4 PxP
4. NxP N-KB3
5. NxN NPxN
6. B-Q3 P-Q4
7. PxP PxP
8. O-O P-B3
9. P-QN3 B-Q3
10. R-K1ch B-K3
11. B-B5 O-O
12. BxB PxB
13. Q-K2 N-K5
14. B-K3 P-Q5
15. BxP BxPch
16. KxB QxB
17. QxN QxR
18. QxPch K-R1
19. QxP QxP
20. Q-K4 QR-B1
21. N-Q2 QxBP
22. Q-K3 Q-B6
23. N-B3 QxQ
24. RxQ KR-K1
25. N-K5 P-N4
26. K-N3 K-N2
27. K-N4 R-B4
28. K-B5 P-KR3
29. P-B3 R-N4
30. P-N3 KR-QN1
31. R-Q3 KR-N2
32. R-Q6 RxP
33. R-N6ch K-R2
34. R-K6 QR-N3
35. R-K8 P-R4
36. P-B4 PxP
37. PxP R-R3
38. N-N4 K-N2
Resigns
Algebraic
1. e4 e5
2. Nf3 Nc6
3. d4 exd4
4. Nxd4 Nf6
5. Nxc6 bxc6
6. Bd3 d5
7. exd5 cxd5
8. 0-0 c6
9. b3 Bd6
10. Re1+ Be6
11. Bf5 0-0
12. Bxe6 fxe6
13. Qe2 Ne4
14. Be3 d4
15. Bxd4 Bxh2+
16. Kxh2 Qxd4
17. Qxe4 Qxa1
18. Qxe6+ Kh8
19. Qxc6 Qxa2
20. Qe4 Rc8
21. Nd2 Qxc2
22. Qe3 Qc3
23. Nf3 Qxe3
24. Rxe3 Rfe8
25. Ne5 g5
26. Kg3 Kg7
27. Kg4 Rc5
28. Kf5 h6
29. f3 Rb5
30. g3 Reb8
31. Rd3 R8b7
32. Rd6 Rxb3
33. Rg6+ Kh7
34. Re6 Rb6
35. Re8 h5
36. f4 gxf4
37. gxf4 Rh6
38. Ng4 Kg7
0-1

14B— 14. B-K4 is also good.
17W— If 17. P-QB3 then would follow 17. Q-Q3ch, 18. K-N1 R-B5 and Black wins.
26W— If 26. N-B7ch and exchange of rooks would follow and White's pawns would fall.

Oscar Samuels (white) vs. Max Judd (black)

Unresolved Chess Game
Unresolved Chess Game: Can you solve it?

Descriptive
1. P-K4 P-K4
2. N-KB3 N-QB3
3. B-QN5 P-KN3
4. P-QB3 B-N2
5. P-Q4 PxP
6. PxP N-K2
7. N-QB3 O-O
8. O-O P-Q4
9. P-K5 P-KB3
10. R-K1 PxP
11. NxP NxN
12. PxN P-QB3
13. B-Q3 B-B4
14. P-B4 Q-Q2
15. N-N2 P-B4
16. N-N3 BxB
17. QxB R-Q1
18. P-N3 P-N3
19. P-KR3 P-QN4
20. N-K2 P-B5
21. PxP NPxP
22. Q-B2 N-B3
23. B-R3 KR-K1
24. QR-Q1 Q-K3
25. P-N4 P-Q5
26. Q-K4 P-Q6
27. N-B3 N-Q3
28. R-KB1 Q-QB3
29. K-N2 QxQch
30. NxQ N-N4
31. B-N2 N-B2
32. R-B1 N-Q4
33. K-B3 R-KB1
34. K-N3 N-K6
35. R-KB2 N-B7
36. P-KR4 R-Q4
37. B-B3 R-B1
38. P-K6 N-Q5
39. BxN BxB
40. R-KB3 B-N7
41. R-Q1 K-B1
42. P-B5 B-K4ch
43. K-B2 PxP
44. PxP P-B6
45. NxP RxN
0-1
Algebraic
1. e4 e5
2. Nf3 Nc6
3. Bb5 g6
4. c3 Bg7
5. d4 exd4
6. cxd4 Nge7
7. Nc3 0-0
8. 0-0 d5
9. e5 f6
10. Re1 fxe5
11. Nxe5 Nxe5
12. dxe5 c6
13. Bd3 Bf5
14. f4 Qd7

April 17, 1949 Los Angeles Times Chess by Herman Steiner

< Prev Index Next >

Chess by Herman SteinerChess by Herman Steiner 17 Apr 1949, Sun The Los Angeles Times (Los Angeles, California) Newspapers.com

In Memoriam
It is with deep regret that we announce the untimely passing of our good friend, Wallace H. Smith of San Francisco, well known in chess circles in the United States.

Jose Raul Capablanca vs Irving Spero

July 08, 1917 The Los Angeles Times, Chess Notes, Los Angeles, California

< Prev Index Next >

ChessChess 08 Jul 1917, Sun The Los Angeles Times (Los Angeles, California) Newspapers.com

CHESS.
GAME NO. 53—CENTER COUNTER GAMBIT.
The following game was one of the most lively ever contested in a Los Angeles team match. It was played in the match by telegraph between Los Angeles and San Diego, May 31, 1915, Mr. Lewis representing Los Angeles.

Eugene Herbert Hollister (white) vs. William A. Lewis (black)
Scandinavian Defense: Valencian Variation
Submitted to chessgames.com on 05/11/2025

Eugene Herbert Hollister vs. William A. Lewis, 1915

Descriptive
1. P-K4 P-Q4
2. PxP QxP
3. N-QB3 Q-Q1
4. P-Q4 P-QB3
5. N-B3 B-B4
6. KB-B4 P-K3
7. B-B4 B-Q3
8. BxB QxB
9. O-O N-B3
10. N-K5 QN-Q2
11. N-KB3 P-KR3
12. B-Q3 P-KN3
13. R-K1 O-O
14. N-K4 Q-B2
15. P-QB3 P-KR4
16. P-KR3 N-Q4
17. N(K4)-N5 N(Q2)-B3
18. N-K5 QR-B1
19. N(N5)xBP RxN
20. NxR QxN
21. B-B4 R-B1
22. Q-K2 N-B5
23. Q-K3 N(B3)-Q4
24. BxN NxB
25. Q-K5 BxPch
26. PxB QxPch
27. K-R1 Q-B6ch
28. K-R2 N-B5
29. Q-K4 QxPch
30. K-N1 R-B4
31. K-B2 N-Q6ch
32. K-K2 R-B7ch
33. K-Q1 NxPch
34. K-B1 QxPch
35. K-N1 P-K4
36. R-QB1 Q-Q6ch
Resigns
Algebraic
1. e4 d5
2. exd5 Qxd5
3. Nc3 Qd8
4. d4 c6
5. Nf3 Bf5
6. Bf4 e6
7. Bc4 Bd6
8. Bxd6 Qxd6
9. 0-0 Nf6
10. Ne5 Nbd7
11. Nf3 h6
12. Bd3 g6
13. Re1 0-0
14. Ne4 Qc7
15. c3 h5
16. h3 Nd5
17. Neg5 N7f6
18. Ne5 Rc8
19. Nxf7 Rxf7
20. Nxf7 Qxf7
21. Bc4 Rf8
22. Qe2 Nf4
23. Qe3 Nd5
24. Bxd5 Nxd5
25. Qe5 Bxh3
26. gxh3 Qxf2+
27. Kh1 Qf3+
28. Kh2 Nf4
29. Qe4 Qxh3+
30. Kg1 Rf5
31. Kf2 Nd3+
32. Ke2 Rf2+
33. Kd1 Nxb2+
34. Kc1 Qxc3+
35. Kb1 e5
36. Rc1 Qd3+
0-1

September 22, 1918 The Los Angeles Times, Chess Notes, Los Angeles, California

< Prev Index Next >

ChessChess 22 Sep 1918, Sun The Los Angeles Times (Los Angeles, California) Newspapers.com

CHESS.
GAME NO. 104—GIUOCO PIANO.
The following game was played in the preliminary round of the pending Pacific Chess Club tourney. It shows a strong game by the 15-year-old player, Croy, against a veteran.

William A. Lewis (white) vs. George Emmett Croy (black)
Italian Game: Giuoco Pianissimo, Italian Four Knights Variation
Submitted to chessgames.com on 05/11/2025

William A. Lewis vs. George Emmett Croy, 1918

Descriptive
1. P-K4 P-K4
2. N-KB3 N-QB3
3. B-B4 B-B4
4. N-B3 N-B3
5. P-Q3 P-Q3
6. P-KR3 B-K3
7. B-N3 O-O
8. B-N5 Q-Q2
9. BxN PxB
10. Q-Q2 K-R1
11. Q-R6 R-KN1
12. QxBPch R-N2
13. N-N5 BxB
14. RPxB Q-K2
15. QxQ NxQ
16. N-B3 RxP
17. R-KB1 N-N3
18. N-Q1 N-B5
19. R-R1 QR-KN1
20. R-QB1 P-QB3
21. K-B1 QR-N3
22. N-R4 R-N8ch
23. RxR RxRch
24. KxR N-K7ch
25. K-B1 NxR
26. N-B5 N-R7
27. K-K2 N-N5
28. QN-K3 BxN
29. NxB N-R3
1/2-1/2
Algebraic
1. e4 e5
2. Nf3 Nc6
3. Bc4 Bc5
4. Nc3 Nf6
5. d3 d6
6. h3 Be6
7. Bb3 0-0
8. Bg5 Qd7
9. Bxf6 gxf6
10. Qd2 Kh8
11. Qh6 Rg8
12. Qxf6+ Rg7
13. Nb5 Bxb3
14. axb3 Qe7
15. Qxe7 Nxe7
16. Nc3 Rxg2
17. Rf1 Ng6
18. Nd1 Nf4
19. Rh1 Rag8
20. Rc1 c6
21. Kf1 Rg6
22. Nh4 Rg1+
23. Rxg1 Rxg1+
24. Kxg1 Ne2+
25. Kf1 Nxc1
26. Nf5 Na2
27. Ke2 Nb4
28. Ne3 Bxe3
29. Nxe3 Na6
1/2-1/2

Drawn after a few more moves.

6W—This move loses time.
7B—Black has now the same position White had in game S. Mlotkowski vs. R. C. Stephenson, published in these columns some time back. White there moved Q-Q2.
11B—Giving up a pawn for attack. Q-K2 was safer.
13W—Allowing Black to regain the pawn with the better game.
21B—This leads to a general reduction of pieces and an even end game. As Black had the advantage in position, such a course should have been avoided. However, there was no clear win for Black in the position.

CORRECTION TO GAME NO. 103.
In making the score of the game, White's 18th and 19th moves and Black's 19th and 29th moves were transposed.

December 17, 1916 The Los Angeles Times, Chess Notes, Los Angeles, California

< Prev Index Next >

ChessChess 17 Dec 1916, Sun The Los Angeles Times (Los Angeles, California) Newspapers.com

William A. Lewis (white) vs. Stasch Mlotkowski (black)
Unorthodox

CHESS
Chess Game No. 26.
Played in the pending handicap tournament of the Los Angeles Chess and Checker Club. Odds of Pawn and Two Moves. Remove Black's king's bishop's pawn. Contributed by S. Mlotkowski.

William Lewis vs Stasch Mlotkowski

Due to 'null moves', please utilize 'PGN Viewer: 'pgn4web', to view this game

June 08, 1919 Philadelphia Inquirer Chess and Checkers

< Prev Index Next >

ChessChess 08 Jun 1919, Sun The Philadelphia Inquirer (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) Newspapers.com

The game given below was played last summer at Los Angeles, Cal., in the Championship Tournament. The announced mate in six moves is well worth examining.

(a) A conservative form of the Giuoco Piano. White plays his fifth move in anticipation of Black Castling and later starting a King side attack.
(b) N-QB3 was the more natural continuation, to be followed by B-Q2, should Black pin the Queen's Knight.
(c) Mlotkowski considers this move weak, as it puts his Queen out of play and leaves the Queen's Pawn without support.
(d) An error of judgment as Black can reply NxBP; 21. NxN QxQ; 22. PxQ PxN, etc, nevertheless the win is not easy.
(e) Likely the best continuation. See previous note.
(f) This move does not improve matters. However, White's game appears hopelessly compromised.
(g) The mate is accomplished as follows: 28. RxPch; 29. K-Ksq N-B7ch; 30. K-Q2 K-K6ch; 31. KxN QxRch; 32. K-N3 Q-K4ch, followed by R-Rsq. mate.

W. A. Lewis (white) vs. Stasch Mlotkowski (black)
Italian Game: Giuoco Pianissimo
Submitted to chessgames.com on 05/11/2025

W. A. Lewis vs. Stasch Mlotkowski, 1918

Descriptive
1. P-K4 P-K4
2. N-KB3 N-QB3
3. B-B4 B-B4
4. P-Q3 P-Q3
5. P-KR3 B-K3
6. B-N3 Q-Q2
7. N-B3 KN-K2
8. B-R4 O-O
9. N-K2 P-B4
10. N-N5 P-KR3
11. NxB QxN
12. B-N3 P-Q4
13. PxP NxP
14. O-O N-R4
15. P-QB3 NxB
16. QxN QR-Q1
17. B-K3 B-N3
18. BxB BPxB
19. KR-K1 K-R2
20. P-KB4 Q-N3
21. PxP N-K6
22. N-B4 Q-N6
23. Q-R4 P-KN4
24. P-Q4 PxN
25. R-K2 R-KN1
26. Q-N3 R-N2
27. Q-K6 QxRP
28. K-B2 Black announced
mate in six moves.
Algebraic
1. e4 e5
2. Nf3 Nc6
3. Bc4 Bc5
4. d3 d6
5. h3 Be6
6. Bb3 Qd7
7. Nc3 Nge7
8. Ba4 0-0
9. Ne2 f5
10. Ng5 h6
11. Nxe6 Qxe6
12. Bb3 d5
13. exd5 Nxd5
14. 0-0 Na5
15. c3 Nxb3
16. Qxb3 Rfd8
17. Be3 Bb6
18. Bxb6 cxb6
19. Rfe1 Kh7
20. f4 Qg6
21. fxe5 Ne3
22. Nf4 Qg3
23. Qa4 g5
24. d4 gxf4
25. Re2 Rg8
26. Qb3 Rg7
27. Qe6 Qxh3
28. Kf2 Rxg2+
29. Ke1 Rxe2+
30. Kxe2 Qg2+
31. Ke1 Qf1+
32. Kd2 Qf2+
33. Kd3 Qc2#

The two-move problem is an original composition by Mlotkowski never before published. Mlotkowski states that the problem was suggested by the four-hand round tournament, but does not comply with the conditions there stated of separate mates for every block, as the Knights are used to answer both the Rook and Bishop moves. However, more variety is obtained in this way, the threat having seven defenses, five illustrating Black interferences and two self blocks.

White to play and mate in two moves.
FEN Q4K1B/2Pp1R2/RN1nk3/2p3p1/2p1r1p1/4b2N/3r1p2/8 w - - 0 1
Solution: 1. Qd8 Nxf7 2. Qf6#

April 06, 1919 Philadelphia Inquirer Chess and Checkers

< Prev Index Next >

Petroff DefensePetroff Defense 06 Apr 1919, Sun The Philadelphia Inquirer (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) Newspapers.com

The following game was forwarded to us by Stasch Mlotkowski, of Los Angeles, Cal. Mlotkowski's method of handling the Petroff Defense will be found of interest.

Elmer W. Gruer (white) vs. Stasch Mlotkowski (black)
Russian Game: Classical Attack, Marshall Variation
Submitted to chessgames.com on 05/09/2025

Elmer W. Gruer vs. Stasch Mlotkowski, 1919

Descriptive
1. P-K4 P-K4
2. N-KB3 N-KB3
3. NxP P-Q3
4. N-KB3 NxP
5. P-Q4 P-Q4
6. B-Q3 B-Q3
7. O-O B-KN5
8. P-B4 P-B3
9. N-B3 NxN
10. PxN O-O
11. R-N1 PxP
12. BxBP N-Q2
13. P-KR3 B-KB4
14. B-Q3 BxB
15. QxB P-KR3
16. RxP N-N3
17. Q-R6 Q-B1
18. N-Q2 R-K1
19. N-N3 R-K2
20. N-R5 P-KN4
21. P-B4 NxP
22. NxN B-N5
23. P-QR3 QxR
24. QxQ RxQ
25. PxB RxP
26. N-K5 RxP
27. NxQBP R-QB5
28. N-K7ch K-R2
29. P-B4 R-K1
30. N-Q5 QR-QB1
31. B-K3 R-Q1
32. N-B6ch K-N3
33. PxP PxP
34. N-N4 R-K1
35. BxP P-B4
1/2-1/2
Algebraic
1. e4 e5
2. Nf3 Nf6
3. Nxe5 d6
4. Nf3 Nxe4
5. d4 d5
6. Bd3 Bd6
7. 0-0 Bg4
8. c4 c6
9. Nc3 Nxc3
10. bxc3 0-0
11. Rb1 dxc4
12. Bxc4 Nd7
13. h3 Bf5
14. Bd3 Bxd3
15. Qxd3 h6
16. Rxb7 Nb6
17. Qa6 Qc8
18. Nd2 Re8
19. Nb3 Re7
20. Na5 g5
21. c4 Nxc4
22. Nxc4 Bb4
23. a3 Qxb7
24. Qxb7 Rxb7
25. axb4 Rxb4
26. Ne5 Rxd4
27. Nxc6 Rc4
28. Ne7+ Kh7
29. f4 Re8
30. Nd5 Rcc8
31. Be3 Red8
32. Nf6+ Kg6
33. fxg5 hxg5
34. Ng4 Re8
35. Bxa7 f5
1/2-1/2

5W--As we have heretofore mentioned N-QB3 is well worth playing. If Black captures the Knight, then White replies QPxN and by Castling on the Queen's side can develop a strong attack against Black King's wing, as Black practically will be forced to Castle on the King's side.

6B--We believe that B-K2 is Black's strongest continuation.

8B--Marshall states that he now prefers to continue with 8. Castles and if White continues with 9. PxP, then Black plays P-KB4, followed by N-Q2, etc.

13W--White, of course, could not play RxP on account of the reply N-B3.

15B--Mlotkowski's comments on this game states that he preferred to give up the Knight's Pawn rather than defend it, as then his King's wing could be weakened by White continuing with N-N5, etc.

February 23, 1919 Philadelphia Inquirer Chess and Checkers

< Prev Index Next >

Chess and CheckersChess and Checkers 23 Feb 1919, Sun The Philadelphia Inquirer (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) Newspapers.com

In the latter part of 1918 Stasch Mlotkowski, a strong Philadelphia player, now residing at Los Angeles, played in two interesting events. In the Los Angeles Tournament he tied with E. R. Perry for first place and in the play-off defeated Perry with a score of two wins, one loss and three drawn games. The following game is one of the contest.

(a) Black could have played B-Q2 Q-N3 or Q-R4ch, but played the text under, the impression that he would get sufficient attack by his next move in reply to PxP to compensate for the break up of the position on the Queen's side.
(b) Well played, in fact, the saving move, as B-N5ch was threatened.
(c) White again chooses the best move. 12. P-K4 BxP; 13. Q-Q2 NxR; 14. Q-K3 looked tempting, but would be answered by NxP with advantage to Black.
(d) White might have played 15. P-B7 QxP; (if Q-R5; R-R2 and, the Knight is still imprisoned); 16. N-N6 Q-Q1; (best) 17. NxR KxB; 18. BxP and now P-N4 could be replied to with Q-N4ch, K-N1; B-Q6.
(e) White threatened Q-N7. The text is to prevent this and give Black's Knight a chance to develop at R3 if White does not continue as in the actual game. P-N4 would have been answered by NxP, PxB; N-R6 dis ch, K-R1: NxB, RxN; Q-N7.
(f) White could have safely continued with P-Q5, as Black could not play R-N7ch, K-N3 and take Pawn either Rook or Bishop. However, the move made is also a good one, as if the Pawn is not taken it will hold Black from making full use of his forces, and if it is White gets a winning end game.
(g) R-K1 should have been played, holding back the King's Pawn. After the text move, Black's game is lost. This seems to indicate White should have played 26. P-K4.
(h) Not a good move on general principles.
(i) P-Q5ch would have won more quickly.
(j) If now P-Q5ch, Black would play BxP and draw.
(k) K-Q6 was somewhat quicker.
(l) B-R6; K-N6; K-B1 would have made it more difficult. White could then win by P-B7, B-Q2; K-B5, B-R5, P-K6; P-K7, B-B2: K-B6, B-K1ch; K-Q5 and bringing the King over to KB8.

Everett Robbins Perry (white) vs. Stasch Mlotkowski (black)
Queen's Gambit Accepted
Submitted to chessgames.com on 5/09/2025

Everett Robbins Perry vs. Stasch Mlotkowski, 1919

Descriptive
1. P-Q4 P-Q4
2. P-QB4 PxP
3. N-KB3 N-KB3
4. B-N5 P-B3
5. P-K3 N-K5
6. B-B4 P-QN4
7. P-QR4 B-KN5
8. PxP P-K4
9. Q-B2 B-KB4
10. NxP B-N5ch
11. N-B3 N-N6
12. Q-R4 BxNch
13. PxB NxR
14. PxP O-O
15. BxP Q-K2
16. Q-N3 P-QR4
17. NxP RxN
18. BxN NxP
19. BxRch QxB
20. QxQch KxQ
21. KxN RxB
22. RxP B-K5
23. P-B7 R-QB1
24. R-QB5 B-N2
25. P-N3 K-K2
26. K-K2 K-Q3
27. K-Q3 RxP
28. RxR KxR
29. P-K4 K-Q3
30. P-B4 P-N4
31. P-B5ch K-K3
32. P-R4 PxP
33. PxP P-R4
34. K-K3 K-B3
35. K-B4 B-B1
36. P-Q5 K-K2
37. P-K5 B-N5
38. P-B6 B-K7
39. K-K4 K-Q1
40. K-Q4 B-B8
41. K-B5 B-N7
42. P-Q6 B-B6
43. K-N6 B-N5
44. K-N7 B-B1ch
45. K-N8 B-R3
46. P-K6 K-K1
47. P-B7 B-B1
48. P-Q7ch Resigns
Algebraic
1. d4 d5
2. c4 dxc4
3. Nf3 Nf6
4. Bg5 c6
5. e3 Ne4
6. Bf4 b5
7. a4 Bg4
8. axb5 e5
9. Qc2 Bf5
10. Nxe5 Bb4+
11. Nc3 Ng3
12. Qa4 Bxc3+
13. bxc3 Nxh1
14. bxc6 0-0
15. Bxc4 Qe7
16. Qb3 a5
17. Nxf7 Rxf7
18. Bxb8 Nxf2
19. Bxf7+ Qxf7
20. Qxf7+ Kxf7
21. Kxf2 Rxb8
22. Rxa5 Be4
23. c7 Rc8
24. Rc5 Bb7
25. g3 Ke7
26. Ke2 Kd6
27. Kd3 Rxc7
28. Rxc7 Kxc7
29. e4 Kd6
30. c4 g5
31. c5+ Ke6
32. h4 gxh4
33. gxh4 h5
34. Ke3 Kf6
35. Kf4 Bc8
36. d5 Ke7
37. e5 Bg4
38. c6 Be2
39. Ke4 Kd8
40. Kd4 Bf1
41. Kc5 Bg2
42. d6 Bf3
43. Kb6 Bg4
44. Kb7 Bc8+
45. Kb8 Ba6
46. e6 Ke8
47. c7 Bc8
48. d7+ 1-0

November 26, 1899 Chess, St. Louis Globe-Democrat

< Prev Index Next >

ChessChess 26 Nov 1899, Sun St. Louis Globe-Democrat (St. Louis, Missouri) Newspapers.com

Tschigorin, after winning the recent Russian championship tournament, was beaten at St. Petersburg by Lewitsky and Nanarkow in consultation. Lewitsky is a brilliant young player, and finished third in the tourney won by Tschigorin. He was matched to play Schiffers, who finished second in the same tourney, but the latter's mind gave way and he was sent to an asylum. The Tschigorin-Lewitsky-Nanrkow game follows:

Mikhail Chigorin vs Stefan Levitsky / Vladimir Nenarokov

The following games were selected from those played in the tourney now pending at the St. Louis Chess Club:

Edward Schrader (white) vs. Dr. Otto Fick (black)
Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense, Suhle Defense
Submitted to chessgames.com on 05/10/2025

Edward Schrader vs. Dr. Otto Fick, 1899

Descriptive
1. P-K4 P-K4
2. N-KB3 N-QB3
3. B-B4 N-B3
4. N-N5 P-Q4
5. PxP N-QR4
6. B-N5ch P-B3
7. PxP PxP
8. B-K2 P-KR3
9. N-KB3 P-K5
10. N-N1 B-QB4
11. K-B1 O-O
12. P-QB3 B-Q5
13. P-QN4 N-N2
14. N-QR3 N-Q4
15. B-B4 B-K3
16. N-K2 B-K4
17. R-QN1 N-Q3
18. BxN PxB
19. N-B2 P-B4
20. P-Q4 R-B3
21. N-B4 B-B2
22. N-K3 P-KN4
23. KNxP4/5 K-N2   
24. P-N3 N-B5
25. NxN BxN
26. N-K3 BxP
27. R-N2 B-K3
28. P-Q5 B-Q2
29. P-QB4 P-B5
30. PxP PxP
31. R-N1 PxN
32. BxP Q-R4
33. B-Q4 R-B2
34. QR-N3 P-K6
35. BxP QxP
36. Q-Q3 B-N4
37. K-K2 QxQch
Resigns
Algebraic
1. e4 e5
2. Nf3 Nc6
3. Bc4 Nf6
4. Ng5 d5
5. exd5 Na5
6. Bb5+ c6
7. dxc6 bxc6
8. Be2 h6
9. Nf3 e4
10. Ng1 Bc5
11. Kf1 0-0
12. c3 Bd4
13. b4 Nb7
14. Na3 Nd5
15. Bc4 Be6
16. Ne2 Be5
17. Rb1 Nd6
18. Bxd5 cxd5
19. Nc2 f5
20. d4 Rf6
21. Nf4 Bf7
22. Ne3 g5
23. Nfxd5 Kg7
24. g3 Nc4
25. Nxc4 Bxd5
26. Ne3 Bxa2
27. Rb2 Be6
28. d5 Bd7
29. c4 f4
30. gxf4 gxf4
31. Rb1 fxe3
32. Bxe3 Qa5
33. Bd4 Rf7
34. Rb3 e3
35. Bxa7 Qxd5
36. Qd3 Bb5
37. Ke2 Qxd3+
0-1

Dr. John L. Cassilly (white) vs. Benjamin Foster (black)
Italian Game: Giuoco Pianissimo, Italian Four Knights Variation

Unresolved Chess Game
Unresolved Chess Game: Can you solve it?

Descriptive
1. P-K4 P-K4
2. N-KB3 N-QB3
3. B-B4 B-B4
4. N-QB3 N-KB3
5. P-Q3 P-Q3
6. P-KR3 B-K3
7. B-N3 N-K2
8. N-K2 N-N3
9. P-QB3 P-KR3
10. O-O O-O
11. B-K3 B-N3
12. N-N3 Q-Q2
13. P-Q4 PxP
14. PxP P-Q4
15. P-K5 N-K5
16. NxN PxN
17. N-R2 P-QB3
18. Q-Q2 BxB
19. PxB P-KB4 
20. PxPe.p. RxP
21. N-N4 R-K3
22. KR-Q QR-Q
23. Q-B3 Q-Q4
24. Q-B4 K-R2
25. R-Q2 KR-Q3
26. QR-Q Q-KB4
27. N-R2 N-R5
28. N-B NxNP
29. KxN Q-B6ch
30. K-R2 R-N3
31. N-N3 B-B2
32. R-KN QxNch
33. PxQ QxB
34. RN-N RxNP
35. RxR QxRch
36. R-N2 QxQ
37. Q-K2 P-Q6
38. Q-R5 Q-Q3ch
39. R-N3 R-KB
40. Q-N4 Q-Q4
Resigns
Algebraic
1. e4 e5
2. Nf3 Nc6
3. Bc4 Bc5
4. Nc3 Nf6
5. d3 d6
6. h3 Be6
7. Bb3 Ne7
8. Ne2 Ng6
9. c3 h6
10. 0-0 0-0
11. Be3 Bb6
12. Ng3 Qd7
13. d4 exd4
14. cxd4 d5
15. e5 Ne4
16. Nxe4 dxe4
17. Nh2 c6
18. Qd2 Bxb3
19. axb3 f5
20. exf6e.p. Rxf6
21. Ng4 Re6
22. Rd1 Rd8
23. Qc3 Qd5
24. Qc4 Kh7
25. Rd2 Rd6
26. Rd1 Qf5
27. Nh2 Nh4
28. Nf1 Nxg2
29. Kxg2 Qf3+
30. Kh2 Rg6
31. Ng3 Bc7
32. Rg1 Qxg3+
33. fxg3

Thomas Edmond Lyons (white) vs. Benjamin Foster (black)

Unresolved Chess Game
Unresolved Chess Game: Can you solve it?

Descriptive
1. P-K4 P-QB4
2. B-B4 N-QB3
3. N-KB3 P-KN3
4. P-Q4 PxP
5. NxP B-N2
6. NxN NPxN
7. P-QB3 P-Q3
8. Q-Q3 N-KB3
9. P-K5 N-Q4
10. P-KB4 P-KB3
11. BxN BPxB
12. PxP QxP
13. N-R3 P-QR3
14. N-B2 Q-B4
15. Q-K2 Q-K5
16. P-KR4 B-N2
17. P-R5 Q-QB
18. PxP PxP
19. RxR BxR
20. QxQ PxQ
21. B-K3 K-K2
22. B-Q4 P-Q3
23. K-K2 P-K4
24. PxP PxP
25. B-B2 B-B3
26. R-R1 R-KR1
27. RxR BxR
28. B-R4ch K-K3
29. P-B4 B-N2
30. P-QN4 B-KB1
31. B-B2 P-K6
32. BxP BxKNP
33. P-N3 PxP
34. PxP B-Q4
35. K-Q3 BxP
36. P-N6 B-N3
37. P-N7 B-Q3
38. B-R7 K-B4
39. P-N8 QBxQ
40. BxB P-N4
41. K-Q2 BxN
42. KxB P-N5
43. K-Q2 K-K5
44. K-K2 P-N6
45. K-B1 1/2-1/2
Algebraic
1. e4 c5
2. Bc4 Nc6
3. Nf3 g6
4. d4 cxd4
5. Nxd4 Bg7
6. Nxc6 bxc6
7. c3 d6
8. Qd3 Nf6
9. e5 Nd5
10. f4 f6
11. Bxd5 cxd5
12. exd6 Qxd6
13. Na3 a6
14. Nc2 Qc5
15. Qe2 Qe3
16. h4 Bb7
17. h5 Rc8
18. hxg6 hxg6
19. Rxh8+ Bxh8
20. Qxe3

September 04, 1921 San Francisco Chronicle, Chess by E. J. Clarke, San Francisco, California

< Prev Index Next >

ChessChess 04 Sep 1921, Sun San Francisco Chronicle (San Francisco, California) Newspapers.com

GAME NO. 20
The following game is from the pending tournament of the Cabrillo Club of San Diego between E. F. Schrader, former Western champion and J. C. Gibbs.

Edward Friederich Schrader (white) vs. Charles John Gibbs (black)
Vienna Game: Vienna Gambit, Bardeleben Variation
Submitted to chessgames.com on 05/10/2025

Edward Friedrich Schrader vs. Charles John Gibbs, 1921

Descriptive
1. P-K4 P-K4
2. N-QB3 N-KB3
3. P-KB4 P-Q4
4. PxKP NxP
5. Q-B3 P-KB4
6. KN-K2 QN-B3 
7. P-Q4 B-N5
8. B-K3 O-O
9. P-KN3 N-R4
10. R-Q N-B5
11. B-B P-QB4
12. P-QR3 PxP
13. PxB NxKP
14. Q-N2 PxN
15. PxP N-N5
16. R-Q4 R-K
17. P-B4 Q-B3
18. P-R3 N(N5)-B7
19. R-R2 PxP
20. B-K3 Q-QN3
21. P-B3 N-Q6ch
22. RxN PxR
23. BxQ PxB
24. N-B P-Q7ch
25. K-Q R-R8
0-1
Algebraic
1. e4 e5
2. Nc3 Nf6
3. f4 d5
4. fxe5 Nxe4
5. Qf3 f5
6. Ne2 Nc6
7. d4 Bb4
8. Be3 0-0
9. g3 Na5
10. Rd1 Nc4
11. Bc1 c5
12. a3 cxd4
13. axb4 Nxe5
14. Qg2 dxc3
15. bxc3 Ng4
16. Rd4 Re8
17. c4 Qf6
18. h3 Ngf2
19. Rh2 dxc4
20. Be3 Qb6
21. c3 Nd3+
22. Rxd3 cxd3
23. Bxb6 axb6
24. Nc1 d2+
25. Kd1 Ra1
0-1

5. Qf3—Inferior to N-B3.
5. … f5—N-B3 looks stronger. If 6. NxN, N-Q5, etc.
6. Nge2—Having occupied KB3 square with the queen, the knight must be developed via KR3. The text move is the cause of white's tied-up game, and indeed he never succeeds in freeing his pieces.
9. g3—To prevent P-B5 and also with a view of developing the B at N2. Later it provides as asylum for her majesty.
21. c3—Schrader rejected the plausible 21. RxN, QxPch; 22. KxN, RxR, etc. However, that would have been better than the text.
25. … Ra1—and white resigned after a few more moves. White must give up queen for the deadly black pawn. A well played game on the part of Gibbs, who takes full advantage of Schrader's unfortunate seventh's move.

June 24, 1916 San Francisco Bulletin, Chess, San Francisco, California

< Prev Index Next >

ChessChess 24 Jun 1916, Sat San Francisco Bulletin (San Francisco, California) Newspapers.com

BULLETIN GAME NO. 24.
On last Decoration Day, May 30, the Los Angeles and San Diego Chess Associations played a telegraphic match of ten boards, the contestants being paired as follows:
Board 1, S. Mlotkowski vs. A. G. Pearsall;
Board 2, W. Waterman vs. C. J. Gibbs;
Board 3, E. R. Perry vs. E. B. Adams;
Board 4, M. A. Woodard vs. H. S. Smith;
Board 5, S. W. Peterson vs. J. Holland Smith;
Board 6, G. A. L'Hommede vs. H. Hugo;
Board 7, W. A. Struve vs. L. W. Palmer;
Board 8, W. A. Lewis vs. E. Rohde;
Board 9, P. E. Greer vs. Fred Baker;
Board 10, D. A. Anderson vs. Allen Brant.
Los Angeles won at boards 1, 3, 4, 6 and 8, and drew at 9, making the final score: Los Angeles 5½, San Diego 4½. Following is the game played at board 2, the score and notes being by J. Holland Smith. Next issue, July 1, the game at board 5, with notes by C. J. Gibbs, will appear, and on July 8 the game Capablanca lost there in his simultaneous contest with J. Holland Smith.

Charles John Gibbs, San Diego (white) vs. Charles West Waterman, Los Angeles (black)
Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Closed Bernstein Variation
Submitted to chessgames.com on 05/09/2025

Charles John Gibbs vs. Charles West Waterman, 1916

Descriptive
1. P-K4 P-K4
2. N-KB3 N-QB3
3. B-N5 P-Q3
4. P-Q4 B-Q2
5. N-B3 N-B3
6. O-O B-K2
7. B-N5 PxP
8. NxP NxN
9. QxN BxB
10. NxB P-QR3
11. N-B3 O-O
12. QR-Q1 NxP
13. BxB NxN
14. KR-K1 N-N4
15. Q-KR4 Q-Q2
16. BxR RxB
17. R-K7 Q-B3
18. Q-K4 QxQ
19. RxQ R-B1
20. P-KB4 K-B1
21. P-B5 R-K1
22. QR-K1 RxR
23. RxR P-Q4
24. R-KR4 N-Q3
25. R-Q4 P-QB3
26. P-KN4 K-K2
27. K-B2 K-B3
28. K-B3 K-K4
29. P-B3 P-KR4
30. P-KR3 P-R5
31. R-Q1 N-K5
32. R-K1 P-KN4
33. PxPe.p. PxP
34. P-R4 P-QN4
35. PxP RPxP
36. R-QR1 N-Q7ch
37. K-K2 N-K5
38. K-B3 N-Q7ch
39. K-N2 P-N4
40. R-K1ch N-K5
41. K-B3 P-B4
42. R-K2 P-B5
43. R-K1 K-Q3
44. K-K3 K-K4
45. R-KB1 N-N6
46. R-B8 K-Q3
47. R-KN8 N-K5
48. K-Q4 N-B7
49. RxP NxRP
50. RxPch K-B3
51. R-R5 N-N8
52. R-R6ch K-B2
53. K-B5 Resigns
Algebraic
1. e4 e5
2. Nf3 Nc6
3. Bb5 d6
4. d4 Bd7
5. Nc3 Nf6
6. 0-0 Be7
7. Bg5 exd4
8. Nxd4 Nxd4
9. Qxd4 Bxb5
10. Nxb5 a6
11. Nc3 0-0
12. Rd1 Nxe4
13. Bxe7 Nxc3
14. Re1 Nb5
15. Qh4 Qd7
16. Bxf8 Rxf8
17. Re7 Qc6
18. Qe4 Qxe4
19. Rxe4 Rc8
20. f4 Kf8
21. f5 Re8
22. Re1 Rxe4
23. Rxe4 d5
24. Rh4 Nd6
25. Rd4 c6
26. g4 Ke7
27. Kf2 Kf6
28. Kf3 Ke5
29. c3 h5
30. h3 h4
31. Rd1 Ne4
32. Re1 g5
33. fxg6e.p. fxg6
34. a4 b5
35. axb5 axb5
36. Ra1 Nd2+
37. Ke2 Ne4
38. Kf3 Nd2+
39. Kg2 g5
40. Re1+ Ne4
41. Kf3 c5
42. Re2 c4
43. Re1 Kd6
44. Ke3 Ke5
45. Rf1 Ng3
46. Rf8 Kd6
47. Rg8 Ne4
48. Kd4 Nf2
49. Rxg5 Nxh3
50. Rxd5+ Kc6
51. Rh5 Ng1
52. Rh6+ Kc7
53. Kc5 1-0

December 08, 1918 Philadelphia Inquirer Chess and Checkers

< Prev Index Next >

ChessChess 08 Dec 1918, Sun The Philadelphia Inquirer (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) Newspapers.com

The following game was played in the recent New York International Tournament. Marshall plays his favorite Queen's Pawn Opening and obtains a magnificent attack by sacrificing a Pawn. Kostich, however, plays the ending with marked ingenuity and wins a well deserved victory.

Frank Marshall vs Borislav Kostic

We offer this week for consideration of our solvers an original two-move problem by Stasch Mlotkowski, formerly of this city, now residing at Los Angeles, Cal. Mr. Mlotkowski has only recently ventured in the realm of problem composers. As a player and able analyst, his name is known the world over. The three-move problem is a neat study with two Rooks and should be solved from the diagram.

Problem No. 1359
By S. Mlotkowski
White to play and mate in two moves.
FEN 8/Kb3prn/Q2N4/4pR2/3pP1nR/4kNp1/2Prp3/2qBB3 w - - 0 1
Solution: 1. Nh2 Bxa6 2. Rf3#

October 13, 1918 The Los Angeles Times, Chess Notes, Los Angeles, California

< Prev Index Next >

ChessChess 13 Oct 1918, Sun The Los Angeles Times (Los Angeles, California) Newspapers.com

Everett Robbins Perry (white) vs. Stasch Mlotkowski (black)
Queen's Pawn Game: Stonewall Attack
Submitted to chessgames.com on 05/03/2025

Everett Robbins Perry vs. Stasch Mlotkowski, 1918

Descriptive
1. P-Q4 P-Q4
2. P-K3 N-KB3
3. B-Q3 N-B3
4. N-KB3 B-N5
5. P-B3 P-K4
6. PxP BxN
7. QxB NxP
8. Q-K2 NxBch
9. QxN P-B3
10. N-Q2 B-Q3
11. P-QN3 O-O
12. B-N2 Q-K2
13. N-B3 N-K5
14. O-O Q-B3
15. QR-N1 Q-R3
16. P-KR3 B-B2
17. P-B4 N-B4
18. Q-B5 KR-Q1
19. B-K5 BxB
20. NxB Q-K3
21. QxQ NxQ
22. QR-B1 P-B3
23. N-B3 K-B2
24. P-B5 P-Q5
25. PxP NxP
26. NxN RxN
27. R-B2 QR-Q1
28. KR-B1 R-Q8ch
29. RxR RxRch
30. K-R2 1/2-1/2
Algebraic
1. d4 d5
2. e3 Nf6
3. Bd3 Nc6
4. Nf3 Bg4
5. c3 e5
6. dxe5 Bxf3
7. Qxf3 Nxe5
8. Qe2 Nxd3+
9. Qxd3 c6
10. Nd2 Bd6
11. b3 0-0
12. Bb2 Qe7
13. Nf3 Ne4
14. 0-0 Qf6
15. Rfb1 Qh6
16. h3 Bc7
17. c4 Nc5
18. Qf5 Rfd8
19. Be5 Bxe5
20. Nxe5 Qe6
21. Qxe6 Nxe6
22. Rc1 f6
23. Nf3 Kf7
24. c5 d4
25. exd4 Nxd4
26. Nxd4 Rxd4
27. Rc2 Rad8
28. Rcc1 Rd1+
29. Rxd1 Rxd1+
30. Kh2 1/2-1/2

CHESS. Game No. 107—Queen's Pawn Opening. The first game of the play off in the tie for the championship of the Pacific Chess Club follow:

(a) This move was played by Tchigorin against Tarrasch at Hastings in 1895 and later was frequently adopted by Pillsbury in games against Showalter. In fact, fifteen to twenty years ago it was the recognized defense. Lately it has dropped out of fashion, the Handbuch giving P-QB4 as best, noting that B-N5 is also worthy of consideration.
(b) The usual move now is P-KB4.
(c) Rather B-K2. Then Black cannot play P-K4 unless he first takes off the White knight.
(d) Here Black should have played NxP; B-K2, N-N3, with the freer game.
(e) Q-N5ch was threatened, Black threatened N-N4.
(f) Black might have obtained the majority of pawns on the queen's side on his last turn by playing PxP, but there would have been no way of forcing the pawns down. White now prevents this. Soon, nothing is left. The draw was indicated after the exchange of queens.

CHESS PROBLEM NO. 42
By S. Mlotkowski
White—K on KB6, Rooks on QR5 and K6, B on Q2, Knight on QR7, Pawns on QB2, Q3 and KB3.
Black‐K on Q5, B on K5, Knights on KB7 and KN7, Pawns on QB2, KB4 and KN5.
Mate in 2.

October 13, 1918 Philadelphia Inquirer Chess and Checkers

< Prev Index Next >

ChessChess 13 Oct 1918, Sun The Philadelphia Inquirer (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) Newspapers.com

The following brilliantly played game between J. S. Morrison, of Toronto, Canada, and Eduard Lasker, the Western champion, occurred in the Western championship tournament. The opening was played on well-known and conservative lines. On the thirteenth move Lasker started an attack on the King's wing, but this was well met by the White forces. On the thirty-third move White in his turn attacked and in brilliant fashion finally forced Black's resignation. Our readers will find great pleasure in the final wind-up.

John Morrison vs Edward Lasker

The following fine problem was composed especially for this column. Considering the comparatively few pieces the key move is well concealed and will we are sure for some little time baffle even our skilled solvers.

Problem No. 1345
By S. Mlotkowski
White to play and mate in two moves.
FEN 8/8/6R1/np1kbK1N/5P2/3PP3/8/2Q5 w - - 0 1
Solution: 1. d4 Nc4 2. Qh1#

January 04, 1903 Chess by Hermann Helms, Brooklyn Daily Eagle, New York

< Prev Index Next >

Chess

MEMBERS OF THE CORNELL CHESS TEAM WHO WON PERMANENT POSSESSION OF THE RICE TROPHY

ChessChess 04 Jan 1903, Sun Brooklyn Eagle (Brooklyn, New York) Newspapers.com

Brooklyn Eagle, Brooklyn, New York, Sunday, January 04, 1903, p. 43
Cornell Now Owns Rice Chess Trophy.
Small Margin Decides Triangular College Chess League Tournament.
QUAKERS MAKE A GOOD FIGHT.
Rand of Brooklyn and Mitchell of Manhattan the Successful Team.
The Records.

At the end of the fourth round of the Triangular College Chess League tournament, held at the rooms of the German Press Club during the past four days, the Cornell team emerged victorious for the third consecutive time, ½ a point ahead of the team of the University of Pennsylvania.
Charles L. Rand of Brooklyn and James R. Mitchell of Manhattan, the members of the winning team, scored a total of five games, each tallying 2½ points.
Under the terms of the deed of gift, the trophy, presented by Isaac L. Rice of Manhattan, becomes the permanent property of Cornell. University of Pennsylvania won this emblem in the initial contest, but since then it has been monopolized by the Ithacans.
The final round began at 9 o'clock yesterday morning, with the players paired in the following order:
Rand (C.) vs. Addleman (P.), Smyth (P.) vs. Hicks (B.), Mitchell (C.) vs. Easton (B.)
As Cornell needed only 1 point to clinch the victory, Rand and Mitchell played for a draw and succeeded in attaining the object.
Rand opened hostilities with a Ruy Lopez. Addleman instituted a premature attack and could not avoid a wholesale exchange of pieces. The Pennsylvanian finally made a desperate attempt at forcing the issue, sacrificing two pawns, without, however, getting any equivalent.
With a winning game in hand, Rand proposed a draw, on the thirty-ninth move, which Addleman accepted.
In the second game Cornell was favored by fortune. After repelling Mitchell's attack, Easton assumed the offensive, winning a pawn on the twenty-fifth move. By choosing an inferior continuation he gave Mitchell a chance to recover and a few moves afterward a draw was agreed to.
The game between Smyth and Hicks was evenly contested up to the twenty-fifth move, when Hicks lost a piece by an oversight, and resigned the game.
At a business meeting, held at the conclusion of the tourney, Charles L. Rand, Cornell, was elected president of the league, and Capwell Allen of Brown, another Brooklynite, secretary and treasurer.
Resolutions of thanks were passed to Herman Ridder of the New Yorker Staats-Zeitung, whose guest the collegians were at the German Press Club, and the house committee of that club for the use of the rooms where the games were played.
Another resolution was passed to the effect that the next tournament should be played in New York City on December 30 and 31 and January 1 and 2.
Charles L. Rand of the winning team is well known in local chess circles, being a native of this borough and 20 years old. At different times he has been a member of the Boys' High School Chess Club, Bishops Chess Club and Central Y. M. C. A. Chess Club.
James R. Mitchell is a Manhattan lad of eighteen summers, and a member of the Manhattan Chess Club, in whose handicap tourney he played last year. His acquaintance with the game extends over a period of only three years. He is a freshman at Cornell.

Charles Lyman Rand (white) vs. Samuel Wolf Addleman (black)
Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Classical Defense Deferred
Submitted to chessgames.com on 05/07/2025

Charles Lyman Rand vs. Samuel Wolf Addleman, 1903

Descriptive
1. P-K4 P-K4
2. N-KB3 N-QB3
3. B-N5 P-QR3
4. B-R4 B-B4
5. O-O P-QN4
6. B-N3 P-Q3
7. P-B3 N-B3
8. P-Q4 PxP
9. PxP B-N3
10. B-B2 B-N2
11. N-B3 N-K2
12. B-K3 P-N5
13. P-K5 PxP
14. PxP N-Q2
15. BxB NxB
16. N-QR4 NxN
17. BxNch P-B3
18. QxQch RxQ
19. QR-Q O-O
20. RxR RxR
21. R-Q RxRch
22. BxR P-QB4
23. N-N5 P-R3
24. N-R3 K-B
25. P-B4 N-N3
26. P-KN3 N-K2
27. N-B2 P-B5
28. B-K2 B-Q4
29. N-Q N-B4
30. K-B2 P-QR4
31. P-KN4 N-Q5
32. K-K3 N-B3
33. K-Q2 P-B3
34. PxP PxP
35. N-K3 P-B6ch
36. PxP PxPch
37. KxP BxP
38. N-B5 P-R4
39. PxP B-K3
1/2-1/2
Algebraic
1. e4 e5
2. Nf3 Nc6
3. Bb5 a6
4. Ba4 Bc5
5. 0-0 b5
6. Bb3 d6
7. c3 Nf6
8. d4 exd4
9. cxd4 Bb6
10. Bc2 Bb7
11. Nc3 Ne7
12. Be3 b4
13. e5 dxe5
14. dxe5 Nd7
15. Bxb6 Nxb6
16. Na4 Nxa4
17. Bxa4+ c6
18. Qxd8+ Rxd8
19. Rd1 0-0
20. Rxd8 Rxd8
21. Rd1 Rxd1+
22. Bxd1 c5
23. Ng5 h6
24. Nh3 Kf8
25. f4 Ng6
26. g3 Ne7
27. Nf2 c4
28. Be2 Bd5
29. Nd1 Nf5
30. Kf2 a5
31. g4 Nd4
32. Ke3 Nc6
33. Kd2 f6
34. exf6 gxf6
35. Ne3 c3+
36. bxc3 bxc3+
37. Kxc3 Bxa2
38. Nf5 h5
39. gxh5 Be6
1/2-1/2

James Ferguson Smyth (white) vs. Leslie Robert Hicks (black)
Ruy Lopez: Closed, Morphy Attack
Submitted to chessgames.com on 05/08/2025

James Smyth vs. Leslie Hicks, 1903

Descriptive
1. P-K4 P-K4
2. N-KB3 N-QB3
3. B-N5 P-QR3
4. B-R4 N-B3
5. O-O B-K2
6. N-B3 O-O
7. P-Q3 P-QN4
8. B-N3 B-N2
9. N-Q5 N-QR4
10. n-K3 NxB
11. RPxN P-Q3
12. N-B5 N-K
13. N-K B-KB3
14. P-KB4 P-N3
15. PxP BxP
16. N-R6ch K-N2
17. N-N4 K-R
18. N-B3 B-N2
19. B-R6 Q-K2
20. BxBch KxB
21. Q-Q2 P-KB3
22. Q-R6ch K-N
23. R-B2 Q-N2
24. Q-R3 P-KR4
25. N-K3 Q-R3
26. N-Q4 N-N2
27. QR-KB P-KN4
28. N(K3)-B5 NxN
29. QxN B-B
30. Q-Q5ch B-K3
31. QxBch Resigns
Algebraic
1. e4 e5
2. Nf3 Nc6
3. Bb5 a6
4. Ba4 Nf6
5. 0-0 Be7
6. Nc3 0-0
7. d3 b5
8. Bb3 Bb7
9. Nd5 Na5
10. Ne3 Nxb3
11. axb3 d6
12. Nf5 Ne8
13. Ne1 Bf6
14. f4 g6
15. fxe5 Bxe5
16. Nh6+ Kg7
17. Ng4 Kh8
18. Nf3 Bg7
19. Bh6 Qe7
20. Bxg7+ Kxg7
21. Qd2 f6
22. Qh6+ Kg8
23. Rf2 Qg7
24. Qh3 h5
25. Ne3 Qh6
26. Nd4 Ng7
27. Rff1 g5
28. Nf5 Nxf5
29. Qxf5 Bc8
30. Qd5+ Be6
31. Qxe6+ 1-0

James Reid Mitchell (white) vs. Stephen Howard Easton (black)
Scotch Game: Schmidt Variation
Submitted to chessgames.com on 05/08/2025

James Reid Mitchell vs. Stephen Howard Easton, 1903

Descriptive
1. P-K4 P-K4
2. N-KB3 N-QB3
3. P-Q4 PxP
4. NxP N-B3
5. NxN NPxN
6. B-Q3 B-K2
7. O-O O-O
8. N-QB3 P-Q3
9. B-K3 N-Q2
10. P-KB4 R-K
11. N-K2 B-B3
12. P-B3 B-N2
13. N-N3 P-B4
14. Q-B2 P-KN3
15. QR-K B-N2
16. P-B5 Q-B
17. PxP RPxP
18. B-QB4 R-B
19. B-KN5 B-QR3
20. BxB QxB
21. P-QR3 N-K4 
22. B-B6 QR-N
23. P-B4 Q-N3
24. R-K2 Q-N6
25. BxN BxB
26. R-B3 QxQ
27. RxQ RxP
28. RxR BxR
29. R-N3 B-Q5ch
30. K-B R-R
31. R-N7 P-B3
32. R-B7 1/2-1/2
Algebraic
1. e4 e5
2. Nf3 Nc6
3. d4 exd4
4. Nxd4 Nf6
5. Nxc6 bxc6
6. Bd3 Be7
7. 0-0 0-0
8. Nc3 d6
9. Be3 Nd7
10. f4 Re8
11. Ne2 Bf6
12. c3 Bb7
13. Ng3 c5
14. Qc2 g6
15. Re1 Bg7
16. f5 Qc8
17. fxg6 hxg6
18. Bc4 Rf8
19. Bg5 Ba6
20. Bxa6 Qxa6
21. a3 Ne5
22. Bf6 Rab8
23. c4 Qb6
24. Re2 Qb3
25. Bxe5 Bxe5
26. Rf3 Qxc2
27. Rxc2 Rxb2
28. Rxb2 Bxb2
29. Rb3 Bd4+
30. Kf1 Ra8
31. Rb7 c6
32. Rc7 1/2-1/2

The final team totals were as follows:

Colleges

Cornell......... 5 - 3
Pennsylvania.... 4½ - 3½
Brown........... 2½ - 5½

The individual scores were:

Mitchell........ 2½ - 1½
Rand............ 2½ - 1½
Addleman........ 2½ - 2½
Smyth........... 2 - 2
Easton.......... 2 - 2
Hicks...........  ½ - 3½

The records of the four tournaments thus far contested are appended:

Year             Cornell      U of P.     Brown
1899............    5½           6            ½
1900............    5½           3           3½
1901............    4½           2½           …
1902............    5            4½          2½

Brown was not represented in the tourney of 1901.

April 09 1910 Altoona Times, Chess, Altoona, Pennsylvania

< Prev Index Next >

ChessChess 09 Apr 1910, Sat Altoona Times (Altoona, Pennsylvania) Newspapers.com

The winner of the two games we publish today is one of the strongest correspondence players in the New England states, played in tournament No. 13, P. N. C. A. A., semi-finals.

Charles Lowell Clark (white) vs. Harlow Bussey Daly (black)
Zukertort Opening: Dutch Variation
Submitted to chessgames.com on 05/07/2025

Charles Lowell Clark vs. Harlow Bussey Daly, 1910

Descriptive
1. N-KB3 P-KB4
2. P-Q4 P-QN3
3. P-B4 P-K3
4. N-B3 N-KB3
5. B-B4 B-N2
6. P-K3 P-Q4
7. B-Q3 N-K5
8. O-O QN-B3
9. PxP PxP
10. N-K5 P-N3
11. B-N5 Resigns
Algebraic
1. Nf3 f5
2. d4 b6
3. c4 e6
4. Nc3 Nf6
5. Bf4 Bb7
6. e3 d5
7. Bd3 Ne4
8. 0-0 Nc6
9. cxd5 exd5
10. Ne5 g6
11. Bb5 1-0

10B…(a) NxKN is better, but still White would have the better game.
11B…Resigns (b) If Q-B3, Q-R1.

Chess Notes.
Franklin F. Russell, chess champion of the New York University, won every game in his simultaneous exhibition given before the members of the Woman's Chess club at the Hotel Martha Washington. He was opposed by seven members of the club, of whom a number played more than one game.
Jose R. Capablanca has merged from his match at pan and move odds with G. J. Beihoff at the rooms of the Manhattan Chess club, winner by the score of 5½ to 1½. The Cuban champion won the first sour games straight, the fifth was drawn, the sixth won by Beihoff and the seventh scored by Capablanca.
Of the seven masters invited to participate in the masters championship tournament at Hamburg in July, Carl Schlechter of Vienna, Dr. S. Tarrasch, of Nureberg, and S. Rubinstein, of Lodz, Russia, have notified the committee of the German Chess association of their acceptance. Dr. E. Lasker, who is in New York and will lecture in Terrace Garden, tomorrow evening, as well as G. Maroczy, of Budapest have declined. It is expected that a place will be made for J. R. Capablanca.

Played in tournament No. 11, P.N.C.C.A. Semi-Finals.

Charles Lowell Clark (white) vs. Harlow Bussey Daly (black)
Latvian Gambit Accepted: Bilguer Variation
Submitted to chessgames.com on 05/07/2025

Charles Lowell Clark vs. Harlow Bussey Daly, 1910

Descriptive
1. P-K4 P-K4
2. N-KB3 P-KB4
3. NxP Q-B3
4. P-Q4 P-Q3
5. N-B4 PxP
6. N-B3 B-B4
7. P-KN4 B-N3
8. B-N2 N-B3
9. P-Q5 N-K4
10. NxN QxN
11. O-O O-O-O
12. R-K P-KR4
13. P-KB4 Q-K
14. P-B5 B-R2
15. NxP Q-Q2
16. P-KR3 B-K2
17. Q-Q4 PxP
18. PxP B-R5
19. QxQRP Q-N4
20. B-N5 K-Q2
21. BxB Resigns
Algebraic
1. e4 e5
2. Nf3 f5
3. Nxe5 Qf6
4. d4 d6
5. Nc4 fxe4
6. Nc3 Bf5
7. g4 Bg6
8. Bg2 Nc6
9. d5 Ne5
10. Nxe5 Qxe5
11. 0-0 0-0-0
12. Re1 h5
13. f4 Qe8
14. f5 Bh7
15. Nxe4 Qd7
16. h3 Be7
17. Qd4 hxg4
18. hxg4 Bh4
19. Qxa7 Qb5
20. Bg5 Kd7
21. Bxh4 1-0

October 06, 1918 Philadelphia Inquirer Chess and Checkers

< Prev Index Next >

ChessChess 06 Oct 1918, Sun The Philadelphia Inquirer (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) Newspapers.com

The Pennsylvania State Chess Association has just completed its correspondence match, the players entered being those representing Pennsylvania and those representing New York. The final score: Pennsylvania State Chess Association won 34; Greater New York Correspondence Chess Association won 16. The match started January 1, 1917. The pairing of the players and results in detail were as follow:

The following was one of the games played in the recent correspondence match between New York and Pennsylvania referred to at the head of this article:

Douglas Wyeth (white) vs. Charles Lyman Rand (black)
Ruy Lopez: Open
Submitted to chessgames.com on 05/07/2025

Douglas R. Wyeth vs. Charles Lyman Rand, 1918

Descriptive
1. P-K4 P-K4
2. N-KB3 N-QB3
3. B-N5 P-QR3
4. B-R4 N-B3
5. O-O NxP
6. R-K N-B4
7. N-B3 B-K2
8. NxP O-O 
9. BxN QPxB
10. P-Q4 N-K3
11. P-Q5 PxP
12. NxQP B-Q3
13. N-QB4 R-K
14. NxB PxN
15. B-K3 P-QN4
16. B-N6 Q-N4
17. P-KB4 Q-N3
18. P-KN4 P-KB4
19. P-N5 B-N2
20. R-K2 Q-R4
21. R-B2 QxQch
22. RxQ QR-B
23. N-K3 R-B3
24. B-R7 P-N3
25. N-Q5 K-N2
26. N-B6 R-K2
27. B-N8 N-B2
28. BxN RxB
29. RxP R-K8ch
30. R-B R-K7
31. R(B)-Q B-B3
32. R(Q)-Q2 R-K8ch
33. K-B2 R-KR8
34. K-K3 R-K8ch
35. K-Q4 R-KB8
36. K-B5 B-K5disch
37. K-N6 R-B2
38. R-K6 RxP
39. N-K8ch Resigns
Algebraic
1. e4 e5
2. Nf3 Nc6
3. Bb5 a6
4. Ba4 Nf6
5. 0-0 Nxe4
6. Re1 Nc5
7. Nc3 Be7
8. Nxe5 0-0
9. Bxc6 dxc6
10. d4 Ne6
11. d5 cxd5
12. Nxd5 Bd6
13. Nc4 Re8
14. Nxd6 cxd6
15. Be3 b5
16. Bb6 Qg5
17. f4 Qg6
18. g4 f5
19. g5 Bb7
20. Re2 Qh5
21. Rf2 Qxd1+
22. Rxd1 Rc8
23. Ne3 Rc6
24. Ba7 g6
25. Nd5 Kg7
26. Nf6 Re7
27. Bb8 Nc7
28. Bxc7 Rxc7
29. Rxd6 Re1+
30. Rf1 Re2
31. Rd1 Bc6
32. Rd2 Re1+
33. Kf2 Rh1
34. Ke3 Re1+
35. Kd4 Rf1
36. Kc5 Be4+
37. Kb6 Rf7
38. Re6 Rxf4
39. Ne8+ 1-0

The two-move problem is an original composition by S. Mlotkowski and has never before been published. The problem is an interesting and neat study. Unfortunately, however, the key move is rather obvious.
The three-move problem was published some years ago, but is well worth a re-examination. The problem should be solved by our readers from the diagram.

Problem No. 1343
By S. Mlotkowski
White to play and mate in two moves.
FEN 2brrb2/p7/p7/7Q/1P1kPPp1/1Pp3N1/2K5/4R3 w - - 0 1
Solution: 1. Qf7 Bg7 2. Qxa7#

September 08, 1918 Philadelphia Inquirer Chess and Checkers

< Prev Index Next >

ChessChess 08 Sep 1918, Sun The Philadelphia Inquirer (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) Newspapers.com

We take the following game from the British Chess Magazine. It was played in the National Correspondence Chess Association. The notes were especially contributed by Stasch Mlotkowski, formerly a member of the Franklin Chess Club, now at Los Angeles, California. The notes will be found of special value.

[The following game was played in the first round of the fifth U.S. National Correspondence Chess Association tournament between Messrs. A. H. Beckman (Pitman, N. J.) and W. H. Woodbury (Roanoke, Va.) The notes are specially contributed to this magazine by Mr. Stasch Mlotkowski. — The British Chess Magazine p. 246]

Augustus Henry Beckman (white) vs. William Nicoll Woodbury (black)
Scotch Game: Schmidt Variation
Submitted to chessgames.com on 05/06/2025

Augustus Henry Beckman vs. William Nicoll Woodbury, 1917

Descriptive
1. P-K4 P-K4
2. P-Q4 PxP
3. N-KB3 N-QB3
4. NxP N-B3
5. N-QB3 B-N5
6. B-QB4 NxP
7. O-O BxN
8. PxB P-Q4
9. B-R3 PxB
10. R-K NxN
11. PxN Q-Q4
12. P-KB3 B-B4
13. PxN BxP
14. Q-N4 P-KB4
15. Q-R4 QxPch
16. K-R P-B4
17. QR-Q Q-K4
18. BxP QxB
19. Q-R5ch K-B
20. RxB Q-B
21. R(K4)-Q4 P-KN3
22. Q-R6ch K-N
23. R-Q7 Q-B
24. Q-R4 Resigns
Algebraic
1. e4 e5
2. d4 exd4
3. Nf3 Nc6
4. Nxd4 Nf6
5. Nc3 Bb4
6. Bc4 Nxe4
7. 0-0 Bxc3
8. bxc3 d5
9. Ba3 dxc4
10. Re1 Nxd4
11. cxd4 Qd5
12. f3 Bf5
13. fxe4 Bxe4
14. Qg4 f5
15. Qh4 Qxd4+
16. Kh1 c5
17. Rd1 Qe5
18. Bxc5 Qxc5
19. Qh5+ Kf8
20. Rxe4 Qc8
21. Red4 g6
22. Qh6+ Kg8
23. Rd7 Qf8
24. Qh4 1-0

February 28, 1914 The Minneapolis Journal, The Weekly Chess Journal by N. H. Nelson, Minneapolis, Minnesota

< Prev Index Next >

ChessChess 28 Feb 1914, Sat The Minneapolis Journal (Minneapolis, Minnesota) Newspapers.com

Game Department.
One of the interesting games from the state tournament. Philidor Opening.

Mor Weiss Testa (white) vs. George Taylor (black)
Philidor Defense
Submitted to chessgames.com on 05/06/2025

Mor Weiss Testa vs. W. J. Taylor, 1914

Descriptive
1. P-K4 P-K4
2. N-KB3 P-Q3
3. B-B4 B-K2
4. P-Q4 PxP
5. NxP N-KB3
6. N-QB3 P-B3
7. P-QR4 P-QR4
8. O-O O-O
9. P-B4 QN-Q2
10. B-Q3 N-B4
11. K-R Q-B2
12. P-B5 QN-Q2
13. B-B4 Q-N3
14. N-N3 N-K4
15. P-R3 KN-Q2
16. Q-K2 B-B3
17. QR-N Q-Q
18. Q-Q2 Q-K2
19. KR-Q KR-Q
20. N-K2 N-QN3
21. NxP P-Q4
22. PxP RxP
23. BxN QxB
24. N-B3 R-Q
25. N-N3 BxP
26. Q-B2 BxB
27. RxB N-Q4
28. NxN RxN
29. R-K3 Q-Q3
30. QR-K P-R3
31. P-B3 R-Q8
32. Q-B2 RxRch
33. RxR Q-N6
34. R-K2 B-K4
35. K-N RxP
36. Q-B5 Q-R7ch
37. K-B2 Q-B5ch
38. QxQ BxQ
39. R-B2 B-K4
40. P-QB4 P-QB4
41. K-B3 P-B3
42. K-K4 R-R
43. K-Q5 1/2-1/2
Algebraic
1. e4 e5
2. Nf3 d6
3. Bc4 Be7
4. d4 exd4
5. Nxd4 Nf6
6. Nc3 c6
7. a4 a5
8. 0-0 0-0
9. f4 Nbd7
10. Bd3 Nc5
11. Kh1 Qc7
12. f5 Nfd7
13. Bf4 Qb6
14. Nb3 Ne5
15. h3 Nd7
16. Qe2 Bf6
17. Rb1 Qd8
18. Qd2 Qe7
19. Rd1 Rd8
20. Ne2 Nb6
21. Nxa5 d5
22. exd5 Rxd5
23. Bxe5 Qxe5
24. Nc3 Rd8
25. Nb3 Bxf5
26. Qf2 Bxd3
27. Rxd3 Nd5
28. Nxd5 Rxd5
29. Re3 Qd6
30. Re1 h6
31. c3 Rd1
32. Qc2 Rxe1+
33. Rxe1 Qg3
34. Re2 Be5
35. Kg1 Rxa4
36. Qf5 Qh2+
37. Kf2 Qf4+
38. Qxf4 Bxf4
39. Rc2 Be5
40. c4 c5
41. Kf3 f6
42. Ke4 Ra8
43. Kd5 1/2-1/2

October 07, 1917 The Los Angeles Times, Chess Notes, Los Angeles, California

< Prev Index Next >

ChessChess 07 Oct 1917, Sun The Los Angeles Times (Los Angeles, California) Newspapers.com

CHESS.
GAME NO. 65—ROSENTRETER'S GAMBIT.
(Notes by S. Mlotkowski.)
Offhand game recently played at the clubrooms, Mr. Testa, director, actor and scenerio-writer with the Universal, got a strangle hold on me in the early stages, which I was never able to shake off.

Mor Testa vs Stasch Mlotkowski

4. … g4 (a) This move should lead to only an even game, so probably B-N2 is better.

5. Bxf4 … (b) This must be the Testa Gambit. The original idea of the Rosentreter Gambit is to play N-K5 here. Then 5. … Q-R5ch; 6. P-N3 PxP; 7. QxP. Now Black's best is QxQ leading to equality. If 7. … P-N7 dis ch; 8. QxQ PxR(Q); 9. N-B3 and, according to the present analysis of this opening, White, although a rook behind, has a winning game.

6. … d5 (c) B-N2 was better.

7. exd5 … (d) B-K5 was of deceptive strength. The move made is better.

7. … Bd6 (e) Again B-N2 was preferable.

8. … Bd7 (f) As the king must soon move anyway, perhaps K-B1 now was best.

9. … cxd6 (g) BxB was no better. Black has a bad, probably a lost, game now.

10. … f6 (h) The only move; N-R3 would have been still worse.

12. … a6 (i) Hoping White would play QxQPch, when I could force the exchange of queens by Q-K2.

13. Bd3 … (j) Much better than QxPch or exchanging bishops. Black is left badly tied up.

13. … Qb6 (k) Stopping N-K4 for the moment, but the queen must soon retreat. Probably B-N4, offering a pawn to free the game, was better.

20. c4 … (l) Best. White has an easily winning advantage.

22. d5 … (m) Preventing the knight from developing at B3 and it cannot well develop at Q2 on account of P-B5.

31. … Rb4 (n) To play R-Q5 in answer to P-B5.

36. Rc7 … (o) The quickest way to win. White's play has been especially fine all through.

Recommended Books

Understanding Chess by William Lombardy Chess Duels, My Games with the World Champions, by Yasser Seirawan No Regrets: Fischer-Spassky 1992, by Yasser Seirawan Chess Fundamentals, by Jose Capablanca Bobby Fischer Teaches Chess, by Bobby Fischer My 60 Memorable Games, by Bobby Fischer Bobby Fischer Games of Chess, by Bobby Fischer The Modern Chess Self Tutor, by David Bronstein Russians versus Fischer, by Mikhail Tal, Plisetsky, Taimanov, et al

'til the world understands why Robert J. Fischer criticised the U.S./British and Russian military industry imperial alliance and their own Israeli Apartheid. Sarah Wilkinson explains:

Bobby Fischer, First Amendment, Freedom of Speech
What a sad story Fischer was,” typed a racist, pro-imperialist colonial troll who supports mega-corporation entities over human rights, police state policies & white supremacy.
To which I replied: “Really? I think he [Bob Fischer] stood up to the broken system of corruption and raised awareness! Whether on the Palestinian/Israel-British-U.S. Imperial Apartheid scam, the Bush wars of ‘7 countries in 5 years,’ illegally, unconstitutionally which constituted mass xenocide or his run in with police brutality in Pasadena, California-- right here in the U.S., police run rampant over the Constitution of the U.S., on oath they swore to uphold, but when Americans don't know the law, and the cops either don't know or worse, “don't care” -- then I think that's pretty darn “sad”. I think Mr. Fischer held out and fought the good fight, steadfast til the day he died, and may he Rest In Peace.
Educate yourself about U.S./State Laws --
https://www.youtube.com/@AuditTheAudit/videos
After which the troll posted a string of profanities, confirming there was never any genuine sentiment of “compassion” for Mr. Fischer, rather an intent to inflict further defamatory remarks.

This ongoing work is a tribute to the life and accomplishments of Robert “Bobby” Fischer who passionately loved and studied chess history. May his life continue to inspire many other future generations of chess enthusiasts and kibitzers, alike.

Robert J. Fischer, Kid Chess Wizard 1956March 9, 1943 - January 17, 2008

The photograph of Bobby Fischer (above) from the March 02, 1956 The Tampa Times was discovered by Sharon Mooney (Bobby Fischer Newspaper Archive editor) on February 01, 2018 while gathering research materials for this ongoing newspaper archive project. Along with lost games now being translated into Algebraic notation and extractions from over two centuries of newspapers, it is but one of the many lost treasures to be found in the pages of old newspapers since our social media presence was first established November 11, 2017.

Special Thanks