Problem No. 60 by A. Efron, Hartford. White to play and mate in two moves.
FEN n1B3bN/2pR1p2/1p3k2/1Pp2N2/2RpKP2/8/8/8 w - - 0 1
Solution: 1. Kd3 Kxf5 2. Rxf7#
17 Moves
Max Lange games in tournaments have always been a great weakness of mine and recently I ran across the following game played in the Barcelona tourney, 1944, which I feel sure will interest the student.
Max Lange
Dr. O.S. Bernstein (white) R. Lorens (black)
Italian Game: Scotch Gambit, Max Lange Attack, Spielmann Defense
(a) Von Bardeleben's continuation. The classical line is 6. … P-Q4 7. PxN, PxB; 8. R-K1ch, etc.
(b) Is unafeared of the double pawn on the KR file. If 7. … P-Q4; 8. B-QN5 or if 7. … P-Q3; 8. B-KN5, etc.
(c) Black brings his only attacking piece back to a square where it will be inactive.
(d) 11. … N-N5 looks better.
(e) If 13. … B-Q2; 14. Q-B3 and White continues the pressure.
(f) Now 15. … B-Q2; would lose a good pawn after 16. Q-N3ch
(g) Black is lost anyway. If 16. … Q-K3; 17. Q-N4ch wins.
(h) There's no way of meeting White's strong 17th move. After 17. B-Q1; 18. RxB, QxQ; 19. RxRch, KxR; 20. PxQ, Black is a piece down.
Bad Habit
Miguel Najdorf vs Nicolaas Cortlever
Buenos Aires Olympiad fin-A (1939), Buenos Aires ARG, rd 6, Sep-07
Gruenfeld Defense: Russian Variation (D96) 0-1
(a) See game Tartakower-Znosko-Borowski.
(b) Well played. If 11. PxP, then Q-B1.
(c) Heroic method of stopping the stamped of the white pawns.
(d) Better by far was 20. P-B5, P-B3; 21. P-R4, etc.
(e) Threatens N-B6ch.
(f) Hard to understand. Why resign when he has the better game? 28. P-N5, gives White an easy advantage in all variations. The moral: Resigning is a bad habit!