The Gift of Chess

Notice to commercial publishers seeking use of images from this collection of chess-related archive blogs. For use of the many large color restorations, two conditions must be met: 1) It is YOUR responsibility to obtain written permissions for use from the current holders of rights over the original b/w photo. Then, 2) make a tax-deductible donation to The Gift of Chess in honor of Robert J. Fischer-Newspaper Archives. A donation in the amount of $250 USD or greater is requested for images above 2000 pixels and other special request items. For small images, such as for fair use on personal blogs, all credits must remain intact and a donation is still requested but negotiable. Please direct any photographs for restoration and special request (for best results, scanned and submitted at their highest possible resolution), including any additional questions to S. Mooney, at bobbynewspaperblogs•gmail. As highlighted in the ABC News feature, chess has numerous benefits for individuals, including enhancing critical thinking and problem-solving skills, improving concentration and memory, and promoting social interaction and community building. Initiatives like The Gift of Chess have the potential to bring these benefits to a wider audience, particularly in areas where access to educational and recreational resources is limited.

Best of Chess Fischer Newspaper Archives
• Robert J. Fischer, 1955 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1956 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1957 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1958 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1959 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1960 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1961 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1962 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1963 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1964 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1965 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1966 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1967 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1968 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1969 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1970 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1971 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1972 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1973 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1974 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1975 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1976 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1977 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1978 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1979 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1980 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1981 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1982 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1983 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1984 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1985 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1986 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1987 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1988 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1989 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1990 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1991 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1992 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1993 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1994 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1995 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1996 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1997 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1998 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 1999 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 2000 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 2001 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 2002 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 2003 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 2004 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 2005 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 2006 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 2007 ➦
• Robert J. Fischer, 2008 ➦
Chess Columns Additional Archives/Social Media

January 18, 1959 Chess by Blake Stevens Express and News, San Antonio, Texas

< Prev Index Next >

Championship ChessChampionship Chess 18 Jan 1959, Sun Express and News (San Antonio, Texas) Newspapers.com

Championship Chess
Blake Stevens
Texas State Champion

Joel S. Quinones, a member of the San Antonio Chess Club, displayed his skill in his encounter with Chess Master George Koltanowski, and demonstrated that when he is in form he is a dangerous adversary.
The opening selected by Koltanowski, a Queen's Pawn Game, drifts into unknown channels early (about move 6). Then a Colle System evolves in which White's Queen Bishop Pawn has been overadvanced to QB4 (instead of QB3) and the Queen is misplaced on QN3. This is a case of striving for too much, which reacts in Black's favor.
This game caused “Kolty” to ponder each move for a considerable length of time, and all the other players who participated in the simultaneous exhibition were able to devote a few more precious seconds to their own games.

George Koltanowski (white) vs. Joel S. Quinones (black)

Unresolved Chess Game
Unresolved Chess Game: Can you solve it?

Descriptive
1. P-Q4 P-Q4
2. N-RB3 N-KB3
3. P-K3 B-N5
4. P-QR4 P-B3
5. Q-N3 Q-B2
6. N-K5 P-K3
7. N-QB3 B-Q3
8. NxB NxN
9. P-KR3 N-KB3
10. B-Q3 O-O
11. O-O QB-Q2
12. P-K4 QP-KP
13. NxP NxP
14. BxN N-R3
15. B-B2 N-R3
16. B-N5 P-QN3
17. KR-N B-K2
18. R-R4? P-KR3
19. R-N3 Q-B5!
20. QR-?? QxQP
21. P-QR3 Q-B5
22. B-Q3 P-QN4
23. BxP PxP
24. Q-B2 Q-N3
25. R-K5 QR-Q1
26. RxR QRxR
27. RxR BxR
1/2-1/2
Algebraic
1. d4 d5
2. Nf3 Nf6
3. e3 Bg4
4. a4 c6
  1. Yielding the Two Bishops for development.
  2. 17. QR-Q1! so as to answer 17. … P-KR3 with 18. B-QB1 and keep the attacking possibilities very much open.
  3. Black keeps White busy with no chance to think of going over to a Kingside assault.
  4. It could be a long, tedious win for Black, but the Two Bishops make the win negligible.

In the next game Mr. Quinones plays the opening indifferently and quickly gets an inferior game. Then his opponent makes an error, but his error — his single error — is greater than the sum total of minor inaccuracies committed by Quinones, which tilts the balance past the equal line. Now another weak move would probably swing it back again. This time Quinones plays the correct move (19) and from then on does not let up, each move mercilessly precise.

Unresolved Chess Game
Unresolved Chess Game: Can you solve it?

J. S. Quinones (white) vs. C. Villareal (black)

Descriptive
1. P-Q4 N-KB3
2. P-QR4 P-QB4
3. N-QB3 PxP
4. QxP N-QB3
5. Q-Q1 P-R3
6. P-K4 B-N5
7. B-KN5 P-R3
8. B-R4 P-KN4
9. B-N3 NxKP
10. R-B3 Q-B3
11. KN-K2 P-QN3
12. P-QR3 NxB
13. RPxN B-B4
14. P-B3 B-N2
15. Q-B2 B-K6
16. N-K4 Q-K4
17. R-Q1 P-Q4
18. PxP PxP
19. RxQP4 Q-K3
20. RxQ6 Q-B7
21. N(2)-B3! Q-R8ch
23. R-Q1 N-Q5
24. BxNPch Resigns
Algebraic
1. d4 Nf6
2. a4 c5
3. Nc3 cxd4
4. Qxd4 Nc6
5. Qd1 h6
6. e4
  1. 3. P-Q5 retains slight advantage whereas the move played relinquishes all of it.
  2. 2.Weak, setting up a target for Black. 6. P-K3 B-N5; 7. KN-K2 is better. After 19. RxQP Black can not capture because of the Knight fork.

Holding Back
On checking results of the Hastings tournament we find that neither Tahl nor Olafsson played, only the minor masters Uhlmann, Darga, Duckstein, Wade, Barden, and a few others participated.
The main reason the stronger players declined to play is probably due in part to the fact that they did not want to reveal their latest opening stratagems, preferring to save them for the all important Candidate's Tournament.
This is not the case with Bobby Fischer. He is in the midst of the U.S. National Championship, and going strong. With two rounds remaining, he is leading such notables as Reshevsky, Bisguier, Evans, Lombardy, Donald and Robert Byrne, Sherwin, Mednis, and Benko. And he is only 15! Surely a future world champion!

December 27, 1958 Chess by Blake Stevens Express and News, San Antonio, Texas

< Prev Index Next >

Championship ChessChampionship Chess 27 Dec 1959, Sun Express and News (San Antonio, Texas) Newspapers.com

January 04, 1959 Chess by Blake Stevens Express and News, San Antonio, Texas

< Prev Index Next >

Championship ChessChampionship Chess 04 Jan 1959, Sun Express and News (San Antonio, Texas) Newspapers.com

Championship Chess
By Blake Stevens
Texas State Champion

The following game exemplifies a slashing attack and a tenacious defense. White's 10th move deviates from the beaten path (20. QN-N5) and appears to be extemporaneous. The plan is to prevent Black from achieving King safety, but the price paid is high, a whole piece.
However, the pressure is strong and eventually White wins an Exchange. In this struggle Black makes eight King moves out of 25, an indication of the intensity of the battle.

Payne (white) vs. Peres (black)

Unresolved Chess Game
Unresolved Chess Game: Can you solve it?

Descriptive
1. P-K4 P-K4
2. N-KB3 N-QB3
3. B-B4 N-B3
4. P-Q4 PxP
5. O-O NxP
6. R-K1 P-Q4
7. BxP QxB
8. N-B3 Q-QR4
9. NxN B-K3
10. B-N5 P-KR3
11. B-R4 P-KN4
12. N-B6ch K-N2
13. B-N3 KxN
14. NxP R-Q1
15. Q-B3ch K-K2!
16. NxN PxN
17. B-K5 K-N1
18. B-B6ch K-Q2!
19. BxR KxB
20. QR-Q4ch K-K2!
21. QxP K-B3
22. R-R3 B-Q3
23. K-BNch K-N2
24. P-QR3 K-N5
25. RxPch KxR
Resigns
Algebraic
1. e4 e5
2. Nf3 Nc6
3. Bc4 Nf6
4. d4 exd4
5. 0-0 Nxe4
6. Re1 d5
7. Bxd5 Qxd5
8. Nc3 Qa5
9. Nxe4 Be6
10. Bg5 h6
11. Bh4 g5
12. Nf6+

In the next game Peres is again called on to defend, but this time he has poor development and no compensation. White opens lines and more lines and on his 18th move begins a powerful combination, sacrificing a piece in order to activate all his men. It is a rout.

Unresolved Chess Game
Unresolved Chess Game: Can you solve it?

Descriptive
1. P-K4 P-K4
2. P-KB4 PxP
3. N-KB3 P-KN4
4. P-KR4 P-N5
5. N-R5 P-KR4
6. B-B4 N-R3
7. P-Q4 Q-B3?
8. O-O P-Q4
9. BxP P-R3
10. RxP QxP
11. BxPch NxB
12. NxN R-R2
13. Q-B4! B-K2
14. N-K5 R-N2
15. B-K3 N-K3
16. P-Q5 B-Q2
17. N-B3 B-QN
18. R-Q1! BxN
19. R-B8ch K-K2
20. P-Q6ch BxP
21. P-K5 B-N5
22. Q-B4! N-R3
23. KxR R-B2
24. KxBch KxR
25. QxRch B-K2
26. P-K6ch K-B2
27. B-Q? P-N6
28. Q-B4h Resigns
Algebraic
1. e4 e5
2. f4 exf4
3. Nf3 g5
4. h4 g4

Hastings
As you read this column, the Hastings Tournament will have just ended. This is an important tournament to watch as, we believe a Russian will be playing (perhaps Tahl), and the Icelander, Olafsson.
They will both play in the coming Candidate's Tourney next year and their final standing at Hastings may be an indication of how they are going to conduct themselves in the World Candidate's event. The Hastings Tournament has been won by a Russian for the last several years. Will this year see a repeat?

January 07, 1960 The Guardian Chess, London, Manchester

< Prev Index Next >

ChessChess 07 Jan 1960, Thu The Guardian (London, Greater London, England) Newspapers.com Gligoric Set To Win AgainGligoric Set To Win Again 07 Jan 1960, Thu The Guardian (London, Greater London, England) Newspapers.com

December 31, 1959 The Guardian Chess, London, Manchester

< Prev Index Next >

ChessChess 31 Dec 1959, Thu The Guardian (London, Greater London, England) Newspapers.com

Chess

Problem No. 556 By F. L. Baxter (Cheadle)
Black (6)
White (7)
White mates in two moves.
FEN 3N2N1/2pp4/Q1pk4/1p5K/3qP3/3RB3/8/8 w - - 0 1
Solution: 1. Qa1 Qxd3 2. Qf6#

Total warfare
Even the games which Tal loses are usually full of interest, for his urge to attack is so great that he can only be defeated after a sharp combinative struggle. The winner of the following game (from the Russian team championships) is notable for what is probably a unique double talent; he is of master strength in both chess and draughts.

Rashid Nezhmetdinov vs Mikhail Tal
2nd Soviet Spartakiad Final-A (1959), Moscow URS, rd 3, Aug-12
Sicilian Defense: Kan. Knight Variation (B43) 1-0

  1. This Paulsen or Kann variation of the Sicilian has been all the rage in the last few years without any definite conclusion being reached. White can vary by either 5. P-QB4 or by Penrose's system of 5. B-Q3 N-QB3; 6. B-K3 followed by O-O and P-QB4. At move seven, too he can branch off by 7. NxN, which Keres and Smyslov tried against Tal in the Candidates' Tournament.
  2. Already Tal is ready for tactical adventures by … N(K4)-N5.
  3. This is partly a matter of style (Nejmetdinov's forte is minor piece endings) and partly an admission that White has lost the initiative. If 12. P-K5 N-Q4; 13. NxN QxN; and Black has the makings of an attack on the long white diagonal.
  4. Effectively freeing his game. 12. … B-N2 seems more natural, but it would be met by 13. P-QR4 NxP; 14. NxN Q-Q4; 15. PxP PxP; 16. RxRch BxR; 17. NxNP QxN(K5); 18. N-B7ch K-Q1; 19. NxB and the black king becomes exposed.
  5. Now Black apparently has a clear advantage with his two bishops and the weak white QP, but White's threat of P-B5 proves awkward to meet. At this point Nejmetdinov offered a draw, and Tal, mistakenly believing that his opponent had said “J'adoube,” replied “Go ahead.” Nejmeidinov then began to move the pieces about and analyse the position, whereupon Tal protested and, after some confusion, the game was resumed.
  6. A fine reply which highlights Black's retarded development. If 18. … BxP; 19. P-B5 PxP; 20. N-B6 db. ch. K-Q1; 21. R-K8 mate.
  7. Again the most forceful, for if 19. … NPxP; 20. NxBP PxN; 21. N-B6 db. ch.
  8. White must continue to operate with definite threats, otherwise Black can castle and begin to make his bishops felt. If 20. … BxBP; 21. NxBch NxN; 22. NxP PxN; 23. RxPch K-B2; 24. R(B1)-B6 regains the piece with a winning advantage.
  9. A splendid sacrifice, which cuts the communications between the two black rooks.
  10. Forced, for if 24. … B-KB1; 25. R-KB1 N-Q4; 26. RxBch RxR; 27. R-N7 with a neat epaulette mate.
  11. Here Tal makes one of his rare tactical miscalculations. Black should be satisfied with a draw by repetition of moves by 25. … B-N4; 26. R-N7 B-QR3.
  12. Regaining the piece. It is too late for 26. … B-QN4 because of 27. RxB and Black is mated by R-B8 or R-N7.
  13. He has to prevent 30. B-R6, but now the king is helpless against the combined attack of the white pieces.
  14. A slightly premature resignation, but White remains a sound pawn up with a continuing attack, e.g., 39. … BxP; 40. R-K5ch K-B1 (if 40. … K-Q2 or K-B2; 41. R-K7ch); 41. RxKRP K-N2; 42. B-R6ch K-N3; 43. RxP.
Gligoric Beats UhlmannGligoric Beats Uhlmann 31 Dec 1959, Thu The Guardian (London, Greater London, England) Newspapers.com

GLIGORIC BEATS UHLMANN
Chess at Hastings
From our Chess Correspondent

Hastings. Wednesday.
There was some vigorous play in the first round of the international chess tournament at Hastings to-day and all five games ended decisively. The Yugoslav champion, Gligoric, won the most important game when he defeated Uhlmann, last year's winner. Uhlmann's position became cramped in the opening and he was never able to free himself. Gligoric broke through and forced a strong passed pawn and when Uhlmann blundered away his queen his position was already desperate.
The Czechoslovak ex-champion, Kottnauer, was another in good form, defeating Bobotsov of Bulgaria by an energetic attack on the king. The Soviet grandmaster Averbakh soon had heavy pressure with his English Opening against Golombek, and he used his two bishops to excellent effect against Golombek's queen's side, winning two pawns and the game.
Pomar of Spain won quickly and efficiently against Heemsoth of West Germany, while the American master, Dr Burger, was always on top against the Hastings Club champion, Winser.

Averbakh Shares Lead With PomarAverbakh Shares Lead With Pomar 01 Jan 1960, Fri The Guardian (London, Greater London, England) Newspapers.com

AVERBAKH SHARES LEAD WITH POMAR
Chess at Hastings
From our Chess Correspondent

Hastings, Thursday.
After the second round of the international chess tournament here, Averbakh of Russia and Pomar of Spain share the lead with two points. They will probably be joined by Gligoric of Yugoslavia, who had a difficult defensive game against Heemsoth for most of the session, but broke out into a winning ending during the last hour. Averbakh's English opening gave him persistent pressure against the American, Dr Burger, who sacrificed a pawn in an attempt at a King's Side counterattack. However, Averbakh easily defended his king and simplified to win a second pawn and the game.
The Hastings champion, Winser, held his own for some time in a complicated Slav defence against Pomar, but finally weakened and lost two pawns. Bobotsov chose a poor variation of the king's Indian defence against Uhlmann and the East German steadily accumulated both pawns and positional trumps. The first draw of the tournament came in a fluctuating game in which first Kottnauer and then Golombek misplayed a winning advantage.

Champion Holds His GroundChampion Holds His Ground 02 Jan 1960, Sat The Guardian (London, Greater London, England) Newspapers.com

Chess at Hastings
CHAMPION HOLDS HIS GROUND
In game with Gligoric From our Chess Correspondent

Hastings. Friday.
The surprise of the fourth round of the international chess tournament to-day was the excellent resistance of the Hastings champion Winser against the Yugoslav grandmaster Gligoric. Gligoric gained some initiative against the Caro-Kann Defence, but in the middle game Winser freed his position by simplifying exchanges. Gligoric transposed into an ending of king and three pawns each, but Winser should draw easily when the game is resumed.
Pomar tried to attack in the centre against Averbakh's Queen's Gambit Declined, but the Russian won the exchange of the queens and rooks and reached a drawn bishop and pawns ending. Kottnauer over-reached himself against Uhlmann in an ambitious attempt to attack on both wings, and the East German is two pawns ahead at the adjournment with a single win. Bobotsov utilised his two bishops in excellent style against Heemsoth, and broke through by a neat sacrifice of rook for bishop.
Golombek had some advantage with his Nimzo-Indian Defence against Dr Burger, but mishandled the later middle game and has the inferior position at the adjournment. In an adjourned game, Gligoric beat Heemsoth.

Gligoric Has A Clear LeadGligoric Has A Clear Lead 04 Jan 1960, Mon The Guardian (London, Greater London, England) Newspapers.com

Chess at Hastings
GLIGORIC HAS A CLEAR LEAD
Pomar the main threat
From our Chess Correspondent

Hastings, Sunday.
After two further rounds of the international chess tournament here Gligoric has established a clear lead with four points, followed by Pomar. 3½ and 1 adjourned, and Averbakh 3½. Results in round five were:
Averbakh drew with Gligoric. Burger lost to Pomar. Winser lost to Bobotsov. Heemsoth beat Kottnauer, and Golombek beat Uhlmann. In round six Bobotsov drew with Averbakh. Gligoric beat Burger. Pomar adjourned with Golombek. Kottnauer beat Winser, and Uhlmann adjourned with Heemsoth. In adjourned games. Burger drew with Golombek. Kottnauer lost to Uhlmann and Gligoric drew with Winser.
Golombek has been in excellent form over the week-end, defeating Uhlmann after the German grandmaster had over-reached himself in an equal position and adjourning with a probably drawn ending against Pomar. Averbakh and Gligoric had a quiet draw, but Gligoric won convincingly against Dr Burger, who sacrificed the exchange for a king's side attack but was overwhelmed when Gligoric united his rooks.
Pomar is the chief threat to the grandmasters.

Down Among The Chessmen by Michael FraynDown Among The Chessmen by Michael Frayn 06 Jan 1960, Wed The Guardian (London, Greater London, England) Newspapers.com Chess SolutionsChess Solutions 06 Jan 1960, Wed The Guardian (London, Greater London, England) Newspapers.com

December 17, 1959 The Guardian Chess, London, Manchester

< Prev Index Next >

ChessChess 17 Dec 1959, Thu The Guardian (London, Greater London, England) Newspapers.com

Chess

Problem No. 555 By T. H. Amirov (Russia)
Black (10)
White (9)
White mates in two moves.
FEN 1B6/3Q1p2/b2Prp1r/1p2k1P1/1b3N1n/2N1Pp2/8/1B1K4 w - - 0 1
Solution: 1. Qa7 Bxc3 2. Qc5#

Class will tell
Keres's second prize in the Candidates' tournament was another reminder that he has been among the world's greatest masters for some twenty years. Curiously enough, his way to the championship has almost invariably been barred by a single stronger player Alekhine, Botvinnik, Smyslov, and now Tal. He was unlucky not to achieve an even greater success in Yugoslavia, for whereas Tal had points thrown at him by both Smyslov and Fischer, Keres himself blundered in two superior positions against Fischer. This week's game, taken from the recent, Russian team cnampionship, illustrates his command of both positional subtleties and tactical attacks.

Zukaev (white) vs. Paul Keres (black)
King's Indian Defense: Accelerated Averbakh Variation

Descriptive
1. P-Q4 N-KB3
2. P-QB4 P-KN3
3. N-QB3 B-N2
4. P-K4 P-Q3
5. B-N5 P-KR3
6. B-R4 P-B4
7. P-Q5 Q-R4
8. P-B3 P-R3
9. P-R4 QN-Q2
10. R-R3 P-KN4
11. B-B2 N-K4
12. B-K3 P-K3
13. B-Q2 Q-B2
14. Q-B2 PxP
15. KPxP Q-K2
16. K-Q1 O-O
17. P-R5 B-Q2
18. N-R4 BxN
19. RxB N(B3)-Q2
20. P-QN3 P-B4
21. N-K2 N-KN3
22. N-N3 N-R5
23. B-Q3 Q-B2
24. P-B4 PxP
25. QBxP N-K4
26. B-K2 QR-N1
27. K-B1 P-N4
28. PxPe.p. RxP
29. B-Q1 R(B1)-N1
30. R-R3 NxBP
31. QxN R-N5
32. Q-B1 Q-B3
33. R-R2 Q-B6ch
34. R-B2 Q-R8ch
35. K-Q2 R-Q5ch
36. K-K2 R-K1ch
37. B-K3 P-B5
38. N-R5 RxBch
39. K-B2 R(Q5)-K5
40. NxB R-B6ch
Resigns
Algebraic
1. d4 Nf6
2. c4 g6
3. Nc3 Bg7
4. e4 d6
5. Bg5 h6
6. Bh4 c5
7. d5 Qa5
8. f3 a6
9. a4 Nd7
10. Ra3 g5
11. Bf2 Ne5
12. Be3 e6
13. Bd2 Qc7
14. Qc2 exd5
15. exd5 Qe7
16. Kd1 0-0
17. a5 Bd7
18. Na4 Bxa4
19. Rxa4 Nfd7
20. b3 f5
21. Ne2 Ng6
22. Ng3 Nh4
23. Bd3 Qf7
24. f4 gxf4
25. Bxf4 Ne5
26. Be2 Rb8
27. Kc1 b5
28. axb6e.p. Rxb6
29. Bd1 Rb8
30. Ra3 Nxc4
31. Qxc4 Rb4
32. Qf1 Qf6
33. Ra2 Qc3+
34. Rc2 Qa1+
35. Kd2 Rd4+
36. Ke2 Re8+
37. Be3 c4
38. Nh5 Rxe3+
39. Kf2 Rde4
40. Nxg7 Rf3+
0-1
  1. Correctly timed, for if instead 5. … O-O; followed by B-R6 and a king's side attack; whereas after Black's actual move the bishop has no completely satisfactory retreat (6. B-B4 P-K4; 7. PxP N-R4 or 6. B-K3 N-N5).
  2. If 7. PxP Q-R4; 8. PxP NxP.
  3. Preferable is 8. Q-Q2, so as to control the central black squares by an eventual P-KB4.
  4. In attempting to avoid the exchange of a bishop for knight (10. B-Q3 N-K4) White fails to maintain the co-ordination of his pieces; here the rook remains out of play for most of the game.
  5. Black must utilise his better development by opening the centre. The reply 13. PxP BxP; 14. QxP N(B3)-Q2 would enable Black to win the BP with a tremendous attack.
  6. If 15. BPxP P-B5 immobilises White's KB, but 15. NxP would free White's position. Black would then continue 15. … Q-Q1; intending … N-B3-Q5.
  7. Forced, for if 16. B-K2 NxRP or 16. K-B2 N(K4)-N5ch; 17. PxN NxPch; 18. K-B3 Q-B3ch; 19. K-K2 Q-B7ch; 20. K-Q1 QxKBch.
  8. Preparing to open the QN file, but an even better method of carrying out this manoeuvre is 17. … R-N1; 18. N-R4 N(B3)-Q2.
  9. Here and at the next move Keres eliminates White's counterplay on the king's side, so that White is reduced to passive defence against the advance on the other wing.
  10. Black's pieces are perfectly co-ordinated, and now comes the decisive combination. If 31. PxN B-N7ch.
  11. Slightly better is 32. QxRP, although Black should still win after 32. … Q-B3; 33. Q-K2 RxB; 34. Q-K6ch QxQ; 35. PxQ R-B7.
  12. A witty climax to the attack. If 41. B or PxR, Q-Q5 mate.

HASTINGS TOURNAMENT
The entry list for the Premier tournament at Hastings (beginning December 30) is Averbakh (Russia), Gligoric (Yugoslavia), Uhlmann (East Germany), Pomar (Spain), Kottnauer (stateless), Bobotsov (Bulgaria), Dr Burger, (United States), Heemsoth (West Germany); and Golombek and Winser (England). Gligoric will be tired after his exertions in the grueling candidates' tournament, so that the other two grandmasters, Averbakh and Uhlmann; are the probable contenders for first prize. Kottnauer and Pomar, the former boy prodigy, are the likeliest competitors to pull off a surprise.

To Occupy Chess PlayersTo Occupy Chess Players 24 Dec 1959, Thu The Guardian (London, Greater London, England) Newspapers.com

December 10, 1959 The Guardian Chess, London, Manchester

< Prev Index Next >

ChessChess 10 Dec 1959, Thu The Guardian (London, Greater London, England) Newspapers.com

Chess

Problem No. 554 By Commander R. F. Fegen, R.N. (Fort Augustus)
Black (5)
White (7)
White males in three moves.
FEN 8/8/8/6B1/2P3p1/K1ppQpP1/2P2P2/3k4 w - - 0 1
Solution: 1. Qe8 dxc2 2. Bc1 Kxc1 3. Qe1#

Sanguineti-Najdorf
A game between a strong player as White and a famous grandmaster as Black often leads to a fascinating struggle if the latter badly needs a win. White will usually adopt a solid variation in the hope that his opponent will overreach himself. In this game from Argentina White gradually loses the initiative, is outmanoeuvred, and succumbs to a splendid kings side attack by Najdorf.

Raul Sanguineti vs. Miguel Najdorf
English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, King's Indian Formation

Descriptive
1. N-KB3 N-KB3
2. P-B4 P-KN3
3. P-QN3 B-N2
4. B-N2 O-O
5. P-N3 P-Q3
6. B-N2 P-K4
7. P-Q3 B-Q2
8. O-O Q-B1
9. N-B3 B-R6
10. N-Q5 NxN
11. PxN BxB
12. KxB P-QB3
13. PxP NxP
14. Q-Q2 P-QR4
15. P-KR4 P-R3
16. QR-B1 Q-Q2
17. P-Q4 P-K5
18. N-N1 Q-B4
19. KR-Q1 KR-K1
20. P-R3 P-K6
21. PxP Q-Q4ch
22. K-B2 P-KN4
23. PxP PxP
24. N-B3 P-N5
25. N-R4 B-R3
26. R-B3 R-K3
27. R-KN1 R(1)-K1
28. N-N2 N-K2
29. N-B4 BxN
30. NPxB N-B4
31. RxPch K-B1
32. R-N5 Q-R8
33. Q-B1 Q-R5ch
34. K-N1 R-R3
35. R-N2 N-N6
36. Q-K1 0-1
Algebraic
1. Nf3 Nf6
2. c4 g6
3. b3 Bg7
4. Bb2 0-0
5. g3 d6
6. Bg2 e5
7. d3 Bd7
8. 0-0 Qc8
9. Nc3 Bh3
10. Nd5 Nxd5
11. cxd5 Bxg2
12. Kxg2 c6
13. dxc6 Nxc6
14. Qd2 a5
15. h4 h6
16. Rc1 Qd7
17. d4 e4
18. Ng1 Qf5
19. Rd1 Re8
20. a3 e3
21. fxe3 Qd5+
22. Kf2 g5
23. hxg5 hxg5
24. Nf3 g4
25. Nh4 Bh6
26. Rc3 Re6
27. Rg1 Re8
28. Ng2 Ne7
29. Nf4 Bxf4
30. gxf4 Nf5
31. Rxg4+ Kf8
32. Rg5 Qh1
33. Qc1 Qh4+
34. Kg1 Rh6
35. Rg2 Ng3
36. Qe1 0-1
  1. White confuses two openings. Pirc has successfully experimented with a double fianchetto against the King's Indian Defence, but an essential aspect of his system is an early P-Q4 and a delayed P-QB4. Other masters have favoured a variation where White plays P-Q3 and P-QB4, but here the idea is an early advance of the QNP and QBP, supported by B-Q2 N-QB3, and R-QN1.
  2. The elimination of his KB already involves a slight weakening of White's castled position, and he should avoid it by 9. R-K1 B-R6; 10. B-R1.
  3. Definitely destroying White's centre, for if 13. P-K4 PxP; 14. PxP, the doubled QPs are a serious liability.
  4. Whether this is viewed as intending an attacking demonstration or merely as discouraging an advance of Black's king's side pawns, in effect it constitutes another weakness of which Black later takes full advantage.
  5. This splendid pawn sacrifice not only further exposes the White king, but gives Black an attacking target on the king's file.
  6. Even stronger than the immediate recapture of the pawn by 22. … QxP; after which White can complicate the position by 23. P-Q5 N-K4 (23. … QxB; 24. PxN, or 23. … BxB; 24. R-N1); 24. BxN BxB; 25. R-B7.
  7. Otherwise 24. … P-N5; permanently incarcerates the knight.
  8. The ease with which Black brings all his pieces into the attack indicates the quality of his pawn sacrifice.
  9. A finely calculated finish, and much stronger than 30. … P-B4.
  10. If 33. RxN Q-R5ch; followed by … Q-N5ch; or … Q-R6ch; wins the rook.
  11. White resigned without waiting for 36. … Q-R8ch; 37. K-B2 N-K5ch. A masterly attack by Najdorf.

December 03, 1959 The Guardian Chess, London, Manchester

< Prev Index Next >

ChessChess 03 Dec 1959, Thu The Guardian (London, Greater London, England) Newspapers.com

Chess

Problem No. 553 R. C. Lyness (Blackpool)
Black (7)
White (7)
White mates in two moves.
FEN 6K1/6B1/pp1p4/5Q2/p1kP2p1/1bP5/1R2P3/8 w - - 0 1
Solution: 1. Qe4 Kxc3+ 2. d5#

Long-distance chess
Correspondence games are ideal for trying out complicated openings which are too risky for over-the-board play; they are also admirably suited for increasing the ability to calculate many moves ahead. The following illustration was played in a telegraph match between Stockholm and Moscow, and Flohr comments that after White's twenty-fourth move he was able to forecast to his friends the final position eighteen moves later.

Gideon Stahlberg (white) vs. Saloman Flohr (black)
Semi-Slav Defense: Botvinnik Variation, Lilienthal Variation

Descriptive
1. P-Q4 P-Q4
2. P-QB4 P-QB3
3. N-KB3 N-B3
4. N-B3 P-K3
5. B-N5 PxP
6. P-K4 P-N4
7. P-K5 P-KR3
8. B-R4 P-N4
9. NxKNP PxN
10. BxNP QN-Q2
11. P-KN3 Q-R4
12. PxN P-N5
13. N-K4 B-QR3
14. Q-B3 O-O-O
15. B-K2 B-QN2
16. O-O Q-Q4
17. Q-N2 QxP
18. QR-Q1 QxNP
19. R-Q2 Q-R6
20. BxP N-K4
21. RxRch KxR
22. B-N3 P-B4
23. R-Q1ch K-B1
24. P-B4 P-B5
25. Q-K2 N-B6ch
26. K-B1 NxPch
27. K-N2 PxB
28. Q-B4ch B-B4
29. QxBch K-N1
30. Q-Q6ch K-R1
31. Q-Q8ch RxQ
32. RxRch B-B1
33. RxBch K-N2
34. N-Q6ch K-R3
35. R-B6ch K-R4
36. N-B4ch K-N4
37. NxQch KxR
38. P-B5 PxBP
39. PxP PxN
40. B-B1 P-R7
41. B-N2 N-N5
42. K-B3 K-N4
Resigns
Algebraic
1. d4 d5
2. c4 c6
3. Nf3 Nf6
4. Nc3 e6
5. Bg5 dxc4
6. e4 b5
7. e5 h6
8. Bh4 g5
9. Nxg5 hxg5
10. Bxg5 Nd7
11. g3 Qa5
12. exf6 b4
13. Ne4 Ba6
14. Qf3 0-0-0
15. Be2 Bb7
16. 0-0 Qd5
17. Qg2 Qxd4
18. Rd1 Qxb2
19. Rd2 Qa3
20. Bxc4 Ne5
21. Rxd8+ Kxd8
22. Bb3 c5
23. Rd1+ Kc8
24. f4 c4
25. Qe2 Nf3+
26. Kf1 Nxh2+
27. Kg2 cxb3
28. Qc4+ Bc5
29. Qxc5+ Kb8
30. Qd6+ Ka8
31. Qd8+ Rxd8
32. Rxd8+ Bc8
33. Rxc8+ Kb7
34. Nd6+ Ka6
35. Rc6+ Ka5
36. Nc4+ Kb5
37. Nxa3+ Kxc6
38. f5 exf5
39. axb3 bxa3
40. Bc1 a2
41. Bb2 Ng4
42. Kf3 Kb5
0-1
  1. Black's opening system was introduced by Botvinnik some fifteen years ago; but it has recently fallen into disuse, partly because of its complexity and also because it can be easily avoided. The most promising continuation for White here is 14. P-N3 N-N3 (if 14. … P-B6; 15. BxB QxB; 16. Q-K2 and White consolidates his extra pawn); 15. Q-B2 O-O; 16. B-K3 K-N2; 17. R-B1, with attacking chances on the queen's side.
  2. A recommendation of Euwe's, which had not previously been attempted in match play. If instead 15. B-N2, Black has the powerful reply 15. … P-B6; 16. NxP N-N1 (not 16. … PxN; 17. QxPch K-N1; 18. Q-R8ch K-B2; 19. QxPch with an overwhelming attack).
  3. Now that White has committed his bishop to K2, counterplay on the diagonal QR1-KR8 is logical.
  4. 16. BxP would be inferior owing to 16. … P-B4.
  5. The most difficult move of the game, according to Flohr. If instead 16. … P-B4; 17. KR-B1 gives White a powerful attack, e.g., 17. … PxP; 18. RxPch K-N1; 19. RxQP BxN; 20. QxB QxB; 21. B-B3.
  6. This pawn sacrifice looks promising, but should only lead to a draw with best play. Flohr's main variation was 17. B-K3 R-N1; 18. KR-B1 P-B4; 19. N-Q2 PxP; 20. QxQ PxQ; 21. QxQP K-N1; when Black is a pawn down but (after … B-B4) retains excellent scope for his minor pieces.
  7. White had aimed at this position with his seventeenth move: Black's king is exposed and his queen out of play. However, White's own queen is awkwardly pinned, and in trying to free her he weakens his king's position. Flohr recommends 24. B-KB4, when 24. … P-B5 falls to 25. BxN PxB; 26. Q-B1, with a winning attack; Black would therefore reply 24. … Q-N7; 25. R-Q2 Q-N8ch; 26. R-Q1 Q-N7 with a draw by repetition of moves.
  8. Now comes a remarkable series of forced moves which leads to a winning position for Black. If 25. PxN B-B4ch; 26. K-B1 PxB; 27. PxP QxP.
  9. Again, if 26. QxN, the intermediate move 26. … B-B4ch before capturing the bishop gives Black a winning attack.
  10. After 27. K-B2 Q-R3; 28. BxP Q-N3ch the white king comes under crossfire from all the black pieces (29. Q-K3 N-N5ch).
  11. Now begins a king hunt with a quite unexpected denouement: White gives ten successive checks, sacrifices his queen and regains her, and emerges a piece ahead; but he is still left with a lost ending.
  12. A desperate trap: if 38. … NPxP; 39. N-B2 P-N6; 40. PxP PxN; 41. PxP P-R8(Q); 42. P-B8(Q), and White can still fight on.
  13. White is overwhelmed by the passed pawns after 39. N-B4 PxP; 40. N-R5ch K-N4; 41. N-N3 K-B5; 42. N-R1 P-N6.
  14. For if 43. B-B3 P-R4; 44. K-B4 N-B7; 45. KxP N-Q8; 46. B-R1 N-K6ch; 47. K-N5 N-B8; 48. B-B3 P-R8(Q); 49. BxQ NxB; 50. K-R6 NxP; 51. K-N7 N-B4; 52. KxP N-K5; 53. K-K7 NxBP; 54. KxN P-R5 and Black queens with check.
A Guide To Chess Endings by Euwe and HooperA Guide To Chess Endings by Euwe and Hooper 04 Dec 1959, Fri The Guardian (London, Greater London, England) Newspapers.com

November 26, 1959 The Guardian Chess, London, Manchester

< Prev Index Next >

ChessChess 26 Nov 1959, Thu The Guardian (London, Greater London, England) Newspapers.com

Chess

Problem No. 552. By C P King-Farlow (Rottingdean).
Black (7)
White (9)
White mates in two moves.
FEN 3N2R1/3n4/3p4/2pr1k1P/2N4B/K2n1PP1/2B2p2/8 w - - 0 1
Solution: 1. Ba4 Rd4 2. Bxd7#

Champion again
In winning the British championship play-off by the overwhelming margin of 2½ points ahead of Golombek and Haygarth, Penrose confirmed unequivocally that he has taken over Alexander's role as our leading player. His positional generalship was too much for Golombek, and his win against Haygarth showed a combinative brilliance excelling any of the games at York. If he plays in the West European zonal tournament next year he should have every chance of being among the winners and securing his international master title.

Michael John Haygarth vs Jonathan Penrose
British Championship Playoff (1959), London ENG, rd 2, Nov-14
King's Indian Defense: Saemisch. Closed Variation 7…c6 (E88) 0-1

  1. White can, if he wishes, play the more non-committal 6. KN-K2, for if then 6. … P-K4 or 6. … P-B3; he has a reasonable reply in 7. B-N5, which is weaker on move six because of 6. … P-B4.
  2. It is now accepted that this continuation, which discourages White from castling QR, is stronger than the alternatives 7. … P-B4. 7. … N-K1, and 7. … N-R4.
  3. Here White decides on a faulty strategical plan which allows Black too much scope on the king's wing. Preferable is 11. P-KN4 P-KR4; 12. P-KR3 N-R2; as in a game between Tal and Gligoric in the candidates' tournament.
  4. 11. … N-K1 and 12. … P-B4 is also good.
  5. A further mistake, after which Black's king's side attack quickly gathers strength. Much better is 15. N-B4 Q-K2; 16. P-QR 4. followed by P-R5 and, if possible, N-R4-N6.
  6. Hoping to maintain his pawn front intact and escape to the centre with his king but he is too late.
  7. This brilliant sacrifice exposes the White king to a withering attack from the Black pieces. It may not be possible to demonstrate a conclusive win, but Black's prospects are very favourable in all variations.
    If now 21. PxN P-B6 with the following possibilities.
    1. 22. PxN Q-R5; 23. PxNP (if 23. P-R3 BxP; 24. PxB P-N7 dis. ch; or if 23. PxBP RxPch; 24. K-N2 Q-R6ch; 25. KxR PxP dis. ch.; 26. K-B2 P-R8=Q and Black wins at least another piece, or in this line 25. K-R1 R-B7), Q-R8; 24. R-B2 B-N5.
    2. 22. PxBP RxPch; 23. K-K1 (23. K-N2 Q-R5; 24. KxR BxPch; 25. K-K3 B-R3ch; 26. K-Q3 BxQ; 27. KxB PxP; 28. B-K3 B-B6), BxP; 24. PxP NxP; 25. Q-R2 Q-N4; 26. R-B2 QR-KB1; with a winning attack.
    3. 22. PxNP NxPch; 23. K-K1 BxP; 24. PxP RxP transposing into the previous variation.
  8. If 24. N-K2 R-B3; 25. R-B2 B-R3; 26. Q-B3 BxP; 27. PxB P-N7ch; 28. KxP R-N3ch; 29. K-B1 QxPch; and mate in a few moves.
  9. If 25. B-B1 BxP; 26. PxB P-N7 dis. ch; 27. K-Q2 (27. Q-B2 P-N8=Q; 28. QxQ N-N7ch); B-R3; 28. K-B2 NxP wins.
  10. If 26. PxB P-N7 dis. ch; 27. K-Q1 B-R3; 28. Q-N1 QxP; 29. N-K2 Q-R8.
  11. For if 30. Q-N1 P-N7; 31. QxR P-N8(Q)ch.

A Guide to Chess Endings, by Dr Max Euwe and David Hooper (Routledge, 248 pages, 30s) fills an important gap in chess literature. The whole field of practical endgame play is considered in detail, with over 300 positions and studies, and there is a pleasing and useful emphasis on the principles which decide the strategy. Some previous works on the ending (for instance Znosko-Borovsky's) gave insufficient examples, while Fine's monumental “Basic Chess Endings” is too detailed to be read through methodically. Euwe and Hooper have steered an excellent middle course, and although the book is too advanced for the beginner it should be invaluable to any club or county player who wishes to improve his game.

November 19, 1959 The Guardian Chess, London, Manchester

< Prev Index Next >

ChessChess 19 Nov 1959, Thu The Guardian (London, Greater London, England) Newspapers.com

Chess

Problem No. 551 By the Rev. V. T. Ducker (Buxton)
Black (10)
White (10)
White mates two moves.
FEN 2K1N3/1np3p1/1qNpkBBb/3p2R1/6P1/1n1Pp3/2Q5/5R2 w - - 0 1
Solution: 1. Qc5 dxc5 2. Re5#

England v. Holland
Five losses, fifteen draws, and not a single win is an undistinguished result, but the English selectors can take comfort from the fact that most of the losses in the match against Holland came from the younger team members overreaching themselves through premature attacks. More disturbing was the inability of the experienced players to make any impression on the solid Dutch positional style, which is based on the teachings of their former world champion Dr. Euwe. Here is a game from the match which illustrates the power of the two bishops on an open board.

Jan Hein Donner (white) vs. Peter Hugh Clarke (black) Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Bernstein Defense

Descriptive
1. P-Q4 N-KB3
2. P-QB4 P-K3
3. N-QB3 B-N5
4. P-K3 P-B4
5. B-Q3 P-Q4
6. N-B3 O-O
7. O-O N-B3
8. P-QR3 BxN
9. PxB QPxP
10. BxBP Q-B2
11. B-N5 P-QN3
12. R-K1 R-Q1
13. B-N2 B-N2
14. P-K4 Q-B5
15. P-K5 N-Q4
16. B-Q3 P-B4
17. PxPe.p. QxBP
18. Q-B2 PxP
19. BxPch K-R1
20. PxP N(B3)-K2
21. B-K4 N-B4
22. B-B1 R(Q1)-QB1
23. Q-N2 K-N1
24. B-N5 Q-B2
25. N-K5 Q-R4
26. Q-Q2 Q-K1
27. P-QR4 R-B2
28. P-N4 N-Q3
29. B-N6 Q-QB1
30. QR-B1 R-B6
31. B-K7 N-QB5
32. B-B7ch Resigns
Algebraic
1. d4 Nf6
2. c4 e6
3. Nc3 Bb4
4. e3 c5
5. Bd3 d5
6. Nf3 0-0
7. 0-0 Nc6
8. a3 Bxc3
9. bxc3 dxc4
10. Bxc4 Qc7
11. Bb5 b6
12. Re1 Rd8
13. Bb2 Bb7
14. e4 Qf4
15. e5 Nd5
16. Bd3 f5
17. exf6e.p. Qxf6
18. Qc2 cxd4
19. Bxh7+ Kh8
20. cxd4 Ne7
21. Be4 Nf5
22. Bc1 Rdc8
23. Qb2 Kg8
24. Bg5 Qf7
25. Ne5 Qh5
26. Qd2 Qe8
27. a4 Rc7
28. g4 Nd6
29. Bg6 Qc8
30. Rc1 Rc3
31. Be7 Nc4
32. Bf7+ 1-0
  1. 1. The latest idea in what has become one of the standard positions in this fashionable modern opening. The extra finesse of this move compared with the natural 11. B-Q3 is that after 11. B-N5 P-QR3; 12. Q-B3 P-K4; 13. Q-B2 R-K1; 14. PxKP NxP; 15. NxN QxN; 16. P-B3, followed by P-K4, Black's pawn formation is a little weaker than in the variations where the QRP will eventually require protection by … P-QN3, to which White can reply with the promising advance P-QR4-5.
    Such is the theory behind 11. B-N5, but a game between Petrosian and Averbakh at Portoroz in 1958 casts doubt on the whole plan. It continued (after 18. P-B3) P-QN4; 17. R-K1 B-N2; 18. P-K4 P-B5; 19. B-B1 N-Q4; 20. B-Q2 N-B5; 21. B-K3 N-K3; 22. QR-Q1 N-B4 with a draw. White's two bishops are of little value with his centre pawns so immobile.
  2. 2. This move is weaker than either 11. … P-QR3 or 11. … B-Q3, since Black's fianchettoed bishop cannot prevent the advance of White's KP.
  3. 3. White could already play 13. P-K4 here, since the combination 13. … PxP; 14. PxP NxP; 15. NxN QB6 (15. … P-K4; 16. Q-B2); 16. B-K3 P-K4 falls against 17. N-K2.
  4. 4. At this stage the central advance is a slight inaccuracy; White should prepare it by 14. Q-B2.
  5. 5. Black in turn fails to find the correct line. He can free himself by 14. … P-K4; for if then 15. BxN (15. P-Q5 N-K2; 16. P-B4 N-N3; and … N-K1-Q3), BxB; 16. NxP BxP and 17. N-N4 is met by 17. … NxN threatening the KRP.
  6. 6. Apparently Black has the makings of a promising king's side attack but White's next few moves emphasize that the vital factors are his pawn centre and greater control of the board.
  7. 7. Threatening 17. R-K4, followed by R-R4.
  8. 8. A forced pawn sacrifice, since otherwise White rolls up the centre by P-B4 and P-Q5.
  9. 9. Again White's hold on the centre nips any counterplay in the bud. He threatens 23. B-N5 while if 22. … NxP; 23. NxN QxN; 24. B-N2 Q-B4; 25. Q-Q2 K-N1 (otherwise 26. Q-R6ch): 26. Q-N5 R-Q2; 27. QR-B1 Q-K2; 28. Q-N6, with a winning attack.
  10. 10. Black is short of time and so facilitates the win. Rather better is the immediate 25. … Q-K1.
  11. 11. White now decides the game with a few powerful strokes which reveal the fatal weakness of the enemy king.
  12. 12. For if 32. … K-R2 White has the pleasant choice between 33. RxR NxQ; 34. R-R3 mate and 33. Q-N5.

Hastings congress
The definite entries for the Premier at Hastings so far are Golombek, Haygarth, and Winsor (England), Gligoric (Yugoslavia), Uhlmann (East Germany), Bobotsov (Bulgaria), and either Heemsoth or Rautenberg of West Germany. A reply is awaited from Anderson of Canada, the highest scorer on second board in the Munich team tournament. Petrosian may be the Russian entry. Other possible competitors are Pomar (Spain), Larsen (Denmark), and Feuerstein (United States).

Penrose Likely To Keep Chess TitlePenrose Likely To Keep Chess Title 21 Nov 1959, Sat The Guardian (London, Greater London, England) Newspapers.com

PENROSE LIKELY TO KEEP CHESS TITLE
By our Chess Correspondent

Jonathan Penrose is almost certain of retaining his title of British chess champion. In the play-off tournament yesterday he beat Golombek in 57 moves. Penrose can now only be caught if Haygarth wins all his three games. However, since Haygarth has a probably lost adjourned ending against Golombek, Penrose is virtually certain of winning the title for the second year running. The scores are: Penrose 3, Golombek and Haygarth 0 and 1 adjourned.
Penrose opened with the King's Indian Defence in his second game against Golombek, who, tried to build up an attacking position on the queen's wing. Penrose maintained aggressive posts for his minor pieces, and then opened the centre and switched his attack to the king's side. Golombek had to sacrifice a pawn and transpose into an ending which Penrose won comfortably.

Chess Champion For Second YearChess Champion For Second Year 23 Nov 1959, Mon The Guardian (London, Greater London, England) Newspapers.com

CHESS CHAMPION FOR SECOND YEAR
Penrose's convincing style
By our Chess Correspondent

Jonathan Penrose retained the British chess championship when his two opponents, Golombek and Haygarth agreed a draw in their adjourned game on Saturday morning after 47 moves. Final scores were: Penrose, 3 out of 3, Haygarth ½ out of 2, and Golombek ½ out of 3. The remaining games were abandoned.
Penrose's overwhelming victory, was achieved in a convincing style which leaves no doubt that he has taken over Alexander's mantle as our outstanding master. He is now expected to participate in next year's zonal tournament in Madrid; this will be the first stage in a series of eliminating events to find a challenger for the world title in 1963.

Chess in a Strand Coffee BarChess in a Strand Coffee Bar 25 Nov 1959, Wed The Guardian (London, Greater London, England) Newspapers.com

November 12, 1959 The Guardian Chess, London, Manchester

< Prev Index Next >

ChessChess 12 Nov 1959, Thu The Guardian (London, Greater London, England) Newspapers.com

Chess

Problem No. 550 By Commander R. F. Fegen. R.N. (Fort Augustus)
Black (6)
White (9)
FEN 2R1B3/6B1/Ppp4K/pP4P1/kb5R/p7/P7/8 w - - 0 1
White mates in three moves.
Solution: 1. Bd7 cxb5 2. Bg4 Be1 3. Bd1#

Genius or swindler?
Even now, after his win of the candidates' tournament, many leading experts are not convinced that Tal is a worthy world championship contender, or that he has the solidity and technique to dereat Botvinnik. Tal himself stated in an interview after the tournament that his play had been uncertain; what enables him to overcome grandmaster opponents even when in poor form is his ability to conjure up tactical surprises in the last few minutes of play when his opponent is harassed by time shortage. Here, as an illustration, is his dramatic second win from Smyslov.

Mikhail Tal vs Vasily Smyslov
Bled-Zagreb-Belgrade Candidates (1959), Bled, Zagreb & Belgrade YUG, rd 22, Oct-18 Sicilian Defense: Najdorf. Scheveningen Variation (B84) 1-0

  1. 1. This variation of the Sicilian was virtually abandoned ten years ago after Boleslavsky had won several resounding victories against it: but it has recently been returning to favour. Smyslov, who previously met 1. P-K4 with 1. … P-K4, now prefers either this Scheveningen variation or the Caro-Kann.
  2. 2. An important finesse, which enables Black to develop his queen's side satisfactorily. If 7. … Q-B2; 8. P-B4 B-K2; 9. Q-K1 O-O; 10. Q-N3. White king's wing attack develops very quickly.
  3. 3. If White opens the centre by 10. P-K5, then 10. … BxB; 11. NxB P-N5; 12. N-QR4 N-Q4 maintains a solid position.
  4. 4. Better than 10. … R-B1; 11. Q-K1 P-K4; 12. N-B5 P-N3; 13. PxP QNxP; 14. N-R6 with a difficult game for Black (Aronin-Smyslov, Moscow, 1959).
  5. 5. 12. P-K5 is still premature owing to the finesse 12. … PxP; 13. PxP B-B4; 14. B-K3 BxB; 15. NxB NxP.
  6. 6. Protecting the bishop and once again preventing P-K5, 11. White replies 13. P-KN4 P-R3; 14. P-N5 PxP; 15. PxP, then 15. … P-Q4 threatening mate.
  7. 7. White could try 14. P-KN4 here, but after 14. … P-Q4; 15. P-K5 N-K1; 16. B-N2 R-B1 Black has sufficient counterplay owing to the weakness of White's queen's side pawn formation.
  8. 8. The theme of Black's middle game strategy is to be the attack against White's KP.
  9. 9. A radical solution. After the natural 21. N-Q4, B-N2 Black retains a slight advantage because of his pressure on the K and QB files: but White should not lose. Tal, however, prefers the gamble of an objectively weaker continuation which will make Smyslov use up time on the clock.
  10. 10. A really drastic throw. If 24. R-B3 Q-N3 White's pieces are scattered and Black's positional superiority is obvious; but now White loses a piece.
  11. 11. White is in extremis and this further sacrifice is his only chance of preventing Black from consolidating his extra piece; but it should not be sufficient against the reply 36. … Q-K2; 37. P-B5 Q-N4; 38. RxPch RxR; 39. BxR Q-R5 and wins). Instead Smyslov, with only a few seconds to reach the time control at move 40, finds a way to lose.
  12. 12. The final error: Black should still probably win after 40. … R(Q1)-Kn1.
  13. 13. A finish worthy of Alekhine himself. If 41. … BxR; 42. QxBch R-N2; 43. QxRch and mate next move, while if 41. … R-N1; 42. R-B8.
Chess Defeat For GolombekChess Defeat For Golombek 14 Nov 1959, Sat The Guardian (London, Greater London, England) Newspapers.com

CHESS DEFEAT FOR GOLOMBEK
By a Chess Correspondent

Penrose beat Golombek in 57 moves in the first game of the triangular play-off for the British chess championship. Golombek allowed a knight to be placed badly on the queen's side and this was enough for Penrose to build up threats on the king's wing. Golombek gave up a rook for a knight to ward these off but Penrose was then able to win the ending easily.
Haygarth plays Penrose to-day and Golombek to-morrow, and it is intended that the three shall play each other next week-end.

Penrose In Strong Position In Play-Off For Chess TitlePenrose In Strong Position In Play-Off For Chess Title 16 Nov 1959, Mon The Guardian (London, Greater London, England) Newspapers.com

Penrose In Strong Position in Play-Off For Chess Title
By Our Chess Correspondent

The holder, Penrose, is in a strong position at the half-way stage in the play-off tournament for the British chess championship. After defeating Golombek in the first round he won a brilliant game with the King's Indian Defence against Haygarth. Haygarth tried to develop an attack with his minor pieces against the Queen's side, and Penrose countered by advancing his KBP and KNP. He broke through by a splendid sacrifice of a knight, Haygarth declined the offer, but then a further bishop sacrifice fatally exposed his king.
Golombek played his favourite Catalan Opening, against Haygarth but made some indifferent moves in the early middle game which allowed a series of simplifying exchanges. In the time rush at the end of the session Haygarth lost a pawn, and Golombek has winning chances in an ending of bishops of opposite colours. The scores are Penrose 2, Golombek and Haygarth 0 and one adjourned.

November 05, 1959 The Guardian Chess, London, Manchester

< Prev Index Next >

Chess ChessChess 05 Nov 1959, Thu The Guardian (London, Greater London, England) Newspapers.com

Chess

Problem No. 549 By Dr S. Subrahmanyam (India)
Black (6)
White (9)
White mates in two moves.
FEN B7/B6P/3pp1N1/R1n3K1/2pkp3/P3R3/5P2/8 w - - 0 1
Solution: 1. Ne5 Kxe5 2. h8=B#

Tal's decisive game
If any single-game in the candidates' tournament was decisive it was surely the one given below, which enabled Tal to establish a clear lead over Keres. The game has several remarkable features, not the least being the very different verdicts about it by distinguished annotators.

Paul Keres vs Mikhail Tal
Bled-Zagreb-Belgrade Candidates (1959), Bled, Zagreb & Belgrade YUG, rd 17, Oct-06
Sicilian Defense: Kan. Modern Variation (B42) 0-1

  1. Better than 6. … NPxN; with which Tal got into difficulties against Smyslov two rounds earlier.
  2. If 8. … N-B3; 9. N-B4 N-Q2; 10. P-QR4 R-QN1; 11. P-R5, followed by B-K3, White would have a tremendous positional advantage owing to his stranglehold on the queen's wing; but after the text move Black can meet 9. N-B4 by P-QN4.
  3. Signalling his intention of a king's side attack, but the positional treatment with 10. P-R5 B-QB4; 11. N-B4, followed by B-K3 still seems more promising.
  4. White probably already has his following plan in mind, but simpler if less ambitious is 27. B-N5 R-Q1; 18. QR-Q1.
  5. Here the annotators begin to disagree with each other. O'Kelly (in the Belgian “Le Phare”) claims that White is left without counterplay by 19. P-B3, overlooking the reply 19. … NxP; 20. QxPch K-R1; 21. B-K3 BxB; 22. PxB R-Q3; 23. Q-N3 N-B4; 24. Q-B2 K-N2 with at least equality for Black, Pirc (in “Schach-Echo”) also condemns 18. RxR and prefers 18. B-N5, but White's actual move is probably playable, even though Keres has clearly miscalculated its consequences.
  6. Both sides are now playing with fire (Black could still equalise by 19. … Q-B2). The threat is 20. … QxPch; 21. QxQ BxQch; 22. KxB NxPch; so the reply is forced.
  7. The only defence to the threatened 22. R-Q7 B-K2; 23. RxB.
  8. Again threatening 23. P-B3 BxP; 24. R-Q7 but Trifunovic in the Swiss “National Zeitung” points out the preferable 22. P-N4! (intending 23. B-B1 and 24. P-N5), QxP; 23. RxB PxR; 24. P-K5, and White has the game continuation with the important improvement that his king has the square KN2 available.
  9. After this move all the grandmasters and seconds in the tournament hall considered Tal to be lost. Keres's second, Mikenas, was even noticed humming Wagner's death march.
  10. It was this fine resource which Keres overlooked and which Tal had already foreseen with 19. … Q-Q5. O'Kelly and Pirc note that if now 25. BxN Q-B8ch wins the knight. But Trifunovic goes further: 26. K-R2 QxN; 27. B-N5 Q-N2 (27. … Q-R4; 28. P-N4); 28. B-B6 Q-R3 (if 28. … Q-N1 the queen is permanently boxed in); 29. B-N5 with a draw by repetition of moves.
  11. Now Black is on top, for White cannot permit the exchange of queens (e.g. 26. Q-B4 Q-K8ch; 27. K-R2 Q-K4) because of the onrushing black pawns.
  12. An inaccuracy which jeopardises the win; much better is 36. … P-R4.
  13. Overlooking the resource of 37. Q-B4 (threatening both 38. Q-B8ch R-K2; 39. Q-N7 and 38. B-B4). the point is that if in reply 37. … P-Q7; 38. BxP! QxB; 39. Q-B8ch R-K1; 40. Q-B5ch and White mates. Now, however, Black wins easily.

October 29, 1959 The Guardian Chess, London, Manchester

< Prev Index Next >

ChessChess 29 Oct 1959, Thu The Guardian (London, Greater London, England) Newspapers.com

Chess

Problem No. 548 By P. A. Petkow (Bulgaria).
Black (8)
White (7)
White mates in two moves.
FEN 8/7p/1p2N2K/3p4/R1bBkN2/R1b4Q/3p4/3n4 w - - 0 1
Solution: 1. Nd3 Bxd4 2. Ng5#

The genius of Tal
The first of the games from the candidates' tournament given below illustrates the combinative genius of Tal at his best; the second shows how the strain of a vital encounter can affect even the greatest masters. At the time of the game Keres was trying hard to keep up with Tal, and this accounts for his uncharacteristic capture of a pawn in the opening at the expense of development.
Fischer played the counter-attack well, but he should not have won but for White's blunder on move 24, Instead 24. B-B3, followed by K-N2, would at least draw.

Mikhail Tal vs Robert James Fischer
Bled-Zagreb-Belgrade Candidates (1959), Bled, Zagreb & Belgrade YUG, rd 20, Oct-11
King's Indian Defense: Petrosian Variation. Normal Defense (E93) 1-0

Paul Keres vs Robert James Fischer
Bled-Zagreb-Belgrade Candidates (1959), Bled, Zagreb & Belgrade YUG, rd 15, Oct-03
Indian Game: London System (A48) 0-1

Tal Beats Fischer AgainTal Beats Fischer Again 29 Oct 1959, Thu The Guardian (London, Greater London, England) Newspapers.com

TAL BEATS FISCHER AGAIN
From a Chess Correspondent

Belgrade, October 28.
Tal beat Fischer in the adjourned 27th round game of the candidates' tournament for the world chess championship. Keres beat Gligoric, Smyslov beat Olafsson, and Benko drew with Petrosian.
The scores with one round to play are Tal (U.S.S.R.) 19½, Keres (U.S.S.R.) 18½, Smyslov (U.S.S.R.) 15, Petrosian (U.S.S.R.) 14½, Gligoric (Yugoslavia) 12½, Fischer (U.S.A.) 11½, Olafsson (Iceland) 9, and Benko (Stateless) 7½.

Tal Wins Right To Compete For World Chess TitleTal Wins Right To Compete For World Chess Title 30 Oct 1959, Fri The Guardian (London, Greater London, England) Newspapers.com

Tal wins right to compete for world chess title
From a Chess Correspondent
Belgrade, October 29.
Mikhail Tal, aged 22, is to challenge Mikhail Botvinnik for the world chess championship, which will be held, probably in Moscow, in March next year.
By drawing with Benko in the twenty-eighth and final round to-day Tal won the candidates' tournament, in which eight grandmasters have been fighting it out for the past couple of months. Keres was second and qualifies automatically for a place in the next candidates' tournament in three years' time.
It has seemed from early on in the tournament, when it became clear that the former world champion Smyslov had lost his form, that Tal was the most likely winner, though at one stage in the final quarter Keres ran close on his heels. Tal has certainly played superbly and has had the mastery of nearly all his opponents.
Two players have greatly disappointed in the tournament Smyslov and Gligoric, the latter on his home ground. Many Yugoslav chess supporters had placed high hopes in Gligoric and he has had some successes, but even his win against Smyslov (White) in eighteen moves was due mainly to the blunders the Russian made.
Of the non-Russians only Fischer, of the United States, looks as if one day he will be a serious contender for the world title. He played very well against Tal in his twenty-seventh round game and should have won. At 16 he has been both the youngest competitor and the most promising. It is not impossible that the day will come when the Soviet Union has to give up the title to an American.

October 22, 1959 The Guardian Chess, London, Manchester

< Prev Index Next >

ChessChess 22 Oct 1959, Thu The Guardian (London, Greater London, England) Newspapers.com

Chess

Problem No. 547 By S. Wright Wood (Shipley)
Black (7)
White (10)
White mates in two moves.
FEN 8/4K3/5P1B/3Np1R1/1Qnpk3/5pP1/N1P5/4r1bB w - - 0 1
Solution 1. Ne3 dxe3 2. Qxc4#

Rooks round the corner
We are so accustomed to seeing king's side attacks in which the rooks are posted behind a general advance of the pawns that it takes an unusual effort of the imagination to foresee a queen's rook joining in a direct assault via the QR file. The manoeuvre occurred in Gligoric-Smyslov, published a fortnight ago, and the following game is also from the candidates' tournament in Bled. Incidentally, for Black to win a Caro-Kann by a king's side attack must be unique in master play.

Robert James Fischer vs Paul Keres
Bled-Zagreb-Belgrade Candidates (1959), Bled, Zagreb & Belgrade YUG, rd 8, Sep-18
Caro-Kann Defense: Two Knights Attack. Mindeno Variation Exchange Line (B11) 0-1

  1. An innovation: in two of the Fischer-Petrosian games Black played 9. … BxBch.
  2. A weak reply, which leaves the white queen's wing full of holes. Far better is 10. P-B3 B-K2; 11. B-B1 P-K4; 12. B-N2 QN-Q2; 13. O-O P-B4; 14. N-Q2 O-O; 15. N-B4 Q-B2; 16. P-QR4, when White's position is preferable—he has the two bishops and can aim for a king's side attack with P-KB4-5.
  3. A second mistake [illegible] which White is driven right on the defensive. Correct is 12. P-QR4, so as to develop the knight at QR3 and QB4, although even then Black maintains some advantage by 12. … N-R3; followed by … N-QN5.
  4. The immediate 13. … P-B4; 14. P-K5 N-Q4 would enable White to weaken the enemy king's position by 15. Q-N4.
  5. White [illegible] a reasonable plan and has to make this cumbersome move to save the pawn (15. … PxP; 16. R-N2). If instead 15. PxP Q-N7 wins.
  6. A sound blockading reply, which prevents White developing counterplay with 18. P-K5 and 19. P-KB4.
  7. A serious positional blunder, which leads directly to defeat. In the sequel, Keres utilises the gift of his K4 square to direct all his pieces against the white king. The correct plan is 21. P-B5, intending the counter-attack P-KN4-5; Black would reply 21. … B-K2 and continue his pressure on the QB file.
  8. And here comes the rook round the corner.
  9. 26. BxB QxB; 27. B-N2 would hold out slightly longer, but Black would still obtain a winning attack after 27. … R-KN4; 28. K-B2 N-K4; 29. Q-K2 (29. Q-B4 R-N5; 30. Q-B5 P-KN3 wins the queen), N(K4)-N5ch; 30. K-K1 QxPch.
  10. Giving up two pieces for a rook, but if 27. PxN, R-R5; 28. B-R3 BxBP and White's game collapses.
  11. A field day for Black's pieces, and a very satisfying win for Keres, who had lost to Fischer in their two previous encounters. When the tearful Bobby resigned, Keres comforted him with the words, “You, too, must lose sometime.” However, Fischer took ample revenge in their fourth meeting, to be given in the “Guardian” next week.
Critical Stage In Chess Candidates' TournamentCritical Stage In Chess Candidates' Tournament 23 Oct 1959, Fri The Guardian (London, Greater London, England) Newspapers.com

Critical stage in chess candidates' tournament
From a Chess Correspondent

Belgrade, October 22.
With only four rounds to be played when the present one is completed, the candidates' tournament for the world chess championship has reached a critical and exciting stage.
Keres, the nearest—indeed the only—rival to Tal, met the leader in Round 24 and adjourned in a strong position. Conscious that much might depend on the result of this game. Tal began perhaps over-cautiously, and Keres seized on his chances and built up a powerful onslaught on the King's side. He should win.
It is doubtful, however, whether the rough handling Tal received in this game will be enough to unsettle him so much that he blunders his lead completely away. After all, before this he had four victories on the run, and he will have to lose virtually all the games yet to play if Keres is to overhaul him.
In round 24 Gligoric had the worst of his game with Olafsson until the Icelander ran into time trouble and started making errors. It could well result in a draw. Fischer beat Benko, who also ran short of time, and Smyslov drew with Petrosian.
The scores now are Tal (U.S.S.R.) 17½ and one adjourned. Keres (U.S.S.R.) 15 and one adjourned, Petrosian (U.S.S.R.) and Smyslov (U.S.S.R.) 13, Gligoric (Yugoslavia) 11 and one adjourned, Fischer (U.S.A.) 10. Olafsson (Iceland) 7½ and one adjourned, and Benko (Stateless) 7.

Excitement in World ChessExcitement in World Chess 24 Oct 1959, Sat The Guardian (London, Greater London, England) Newspapers.com

Excitement in world chess
Tal takes his revenge on Smyslov
From a Chess Correspondent

Belgrade, October 23.
With their 24th round encounter in the world chess championship candidates' tournament adjourned, Tal and Keres were content with quick draws in round 25, the former against Olafsson and the latter against Petrosian. Smyslov beat Benko, and the Gligoric-Fischer game was adjourned in a drawn position.
The scores now are Tal (U.S.S.R.) 18 and one adjourned. Keres (U.S.S.R.) 15½ and one adjourned. Smyslov (U.S.S.R.) 14, Petrosian (U.S.S.R.) 13½, Gligoric (Yugoslavia) 11 and two adjourned, Fischer (U.S.A.) 10 and one adjourned. Olafsson (Iceland) 8 and one adjourned, and Benko (stateless) 7.
These last few rounds have been overshadowed by a personal issue between Tal and Smyslov. On the eve or their encounter in round 22, Smyslov, a former world champion, gave an interview to one of the biggest Yugoslav dailies, stating openly that Tal's successes were, in his opinion, undeserved; he even qualified Tal's courageous combinations as “tricks.”
In the crowded tournament room, which seats almost 3,000 spectators, there was therefore keen excitement when the two met face to face. Although his bad start in the tournament spoiled Smyslov's chances of first place, a win at this stage could have evened the chances of Keres and Tal. He chose to play for a win, although his opponent had the advantage of the first move.
Tal did not attempt to prove that his style was correct, but only that it was effective enough, even when used against a former world champion. He chose to weaken his Queen's side, only to place his pieces more actively. In the meantime, Smyslov rearranged his forces very harmoniously, with strategical plans in mind. Tal's goals were more direct.
The tension rose from move to move, in the game as well as among the public. However, just when Tal's pieces took their ideal aggressive positions it became clear that his ideas had come to a dead end, and he was suddenly unable to strengthen his pressure. Smyslov's strategy seemed to triumph; the masters present had already decided that Smyslov, had breathed fresh ideas into the whole, opening line, so that it could be expected to be followed in years to come.
Threatened with a counter-attack, however, Tal decided to sacrifice, a piece in his usual manner, just to complicate the position. It was not difficult for Smyslov to find the right answers at first; but then, lacking time, he began to overestimate his material advantage, moving his pieces here and there just to pass the time control.
Given his chance, Tal used it so fast that it seemed he had made something; out of nothing. Having mined Black's centre, he offered a quite unexpected sacrifice of his rook just before the moment when the game had to be adjourned. Smyslov thought for half an hour, and did not seal his move, deciding to resign instead. The resounding applause did not seem quite just for Smyslov had the upper hand almost throughout the game.

Tal Loses Round, But Still AheadTal Loses Round, But Still Ahead 26 Oct 1959, Mon The Guardian (London, Greater London, England) Newspapers.com

Tal Loses Round, But Still Ahead
From a Chess Correspondent

Caption: Tal, the leader, was beaten by Keres in the twenty-fourth round of the world chess championship candidates' tournament in Yugoslavia, after four wins in succession.
Belgrade, October 25.
The question of who shall meet Botvinnik for the world chess title next year is now virtually settled, and the world champion has already said he has begun to study the style of his new rival, Mikhail Tal.
This remains true in spite of Keres's win over the leader in the adjourned 24th round game. In this, Tal lost two pawns and Keres was able to force a neat ending.
Keres's win makes the finish more interesting, but cannot change its outcome. His only consolation is that the second place here gives one the right automatically to compete at the next candidates' tournament three years from now. The Gligoric-Fischer game was drawn.
The leading scores are: Tal (U.S.S.R.), 18; Keres (U.S.S.R.), 16½; Smyslov (U.S.S.R.), 14; Petrosian (U.S.S.R.), 13½; Gligoric (Yugoslavia), 11½; Fischer (U.S.A.), 10½; Olafsson (Iceland), 9; and Benko (stateless), 7.

Chess Win For HollandChess Win For Holland 26 Oct 1959, Mon The Guardian (London, Greater London, England) Newspapers.com

CHESS WIN FOR HOLLAND
England outplayed
From our Chess Correspondent

Cheltenham, Sunday.
Holland defeated England 12½ to 7½, with one game unfinished, in the annual friendly chess match in Cheltenham. The Dutch were clearly the superior team, and England's score included fifteen draws but not a single win. The full results (English names first) were:

Penrose ½, ½; Dr. Euwe ½, ½; Clarke 0, ½; Donner 1, ½; Alexander ½, ½; Bouwmeester ½, ½; Barden ½, ½; Cortlever ½, ½; Haygarth 0, ½; van Scheltinga 1, ½; Wade ½, ½; Kramer ½, ½; Milner-Barry ½, ½; Van den Berg ½, ½; Cafferty 0, ½; Barendreght 1, ½; Mardle ½, 0; Spaniard ½, 1; Littlewood ½; Roessel ½.

The most satisfying aspect of the match was Penrose's double draw with the former world champion, Dr Euwe. In the first round Penrose made a mistake in the opening against the Caro-Kann defence but then held on in the difficult ending in spite of severe time shortage. In the second game Dr Euwe tried an idea of his own against the King's Indian defence, but Penrose correctly brought about simplifying exchanges and had rather the better of the resulting ending.
Donner's win against Clarke was a fine one: he took control of the centre of the board in the opening, and although Clarke sacrificed a pawn for counter play Donner built up an overwhelming king's side attack. The Dutch team's superior knowledge of the openings was a feature of many of the other games, and too often the hopes of the home team were confined to draws attained by careful defence.
England's only real missed chance was in the second game between Haygarth and van Scheltinga, in which the young Yorkshireman outplayed his opponent and won a pawn, but tired at the critical moment and allowed a draw by perpetual check.

Fischer's Fine Play Against Tal in Chess TournamentFischer's Fine Play Against Tal in Chess Tournament 28 Oct 1959, Wed The Guardian (London, Greater London, England) Newspapers.com

Fischer's fine play against Tal in chess tournament
From a Chess Correspondent

Belgrade, October 27.
Two intensely exciting games have transformed the final stages of the candidates' tournament for the world chess championship—that in which the former world champion Smyslov, playing White, lost to the Yugoslav, Gligoric, in eighteen moves, and that in which Bobby Fischer, the United States prodigy, playing a superb attack, nearly humbled the leader, the almost invincible Tal.
Smyslov's play in his 26th round game was incredibly bad. Here is the game:

Vasily Smyslov vs Svetozar Gligoric
Bled-Zagreb-Belgrade Candidates (1959), Bled, Zagreb & Belgrade YUG, rd 26, Oct-25
Indian Game: West Indian Defense (E61) 0-1

White resigns, as 19. P-K4 would be answered by 19. … BxN, 20. BxB N-B6, winning a piece.
1. 5. PxP? and 9. P-QN4?—White plays the opening too artificially.
2. 13. N-R3, if 13. N-B3, then simply NxN and if BxN, then B-R5 or B-K3.
3. 15. … B-Q2. Threatening B-R5.
4. 17. Q-N1. If White had castled here, 17. … B-R5 wins material.

The Fischer-Tal excitement began when Fischer launched his onslaught. He gave up a pawn so as to keep Tal's centre open and then a piece with the same object. Just when it seemed that his attack could not fail he overlooked a clear win. Tal made up ground and at the adjournment had a won ending.
The other games in Round 27 were also adjourned Gligoric v. Keres, Benko v. Petrosian, and Olafsson v. Smyslov. Keres and Smyslov should win.
The scores are Tal (U.S.S.R.) 18½ and one adjourned, Keres (U.S.S.R.) 17½ and one adjourned, Petrosian and Smyslov (U.S.S.R.) 14 and one adjourned, Gligoric (Yugoslavia) 12½ and one adjourned, Fischer (U.S.A.) 10½ and two adjourned, Olafsson (Iceland) 9 and two adjourned, Benko (stateless) 7 and one adjourned.

Recommended Books

Understanding Chess by William Lombardy Chess Duels, My Games with the World Champions, by Yasser Seirawan No Regrets: Fischer-Spassky 1992, by Yasser Seirawan Chess Fundamentals, by Jose Capablanca Bobby Fischer Teaches Chess, by Bobby Fischer My 60 Memorable Games, by Bobby Fischer Bobby Fischer Games of Chess, by Bobby Fischer The Modern Chess Self Tutor, by David Bronstein Russians versus Fischer, by Mikhail Tal, Plisetsky, Taimanov, et al

'til the world understands why Robert J. Fischer criticised the U.S./British and Russian military industry imperial alliance and their own Israeli Apartheid. Sarah Wilkinson explains:

Bobby Fischer, First Amendment, Freedom of Speech
What a sad story Fischer was,” typed a racist, pro-imperialist colonial troll who supports mega-corporation entities over human rights, police state policies & white supremacy.
To which I replied: “Really? I think he [Bob Fischer] stood up to the broken system of corruption and raised awareness! Whether on the Palestinian/Israel-British-U.S. Imperial Apartheid scam, the Bush wars of ‘7 countries in 5 years,’ illegally, unconstitutionally which constituted mass xenocide or his run in with police brutality in Pasadena, California-- right here in the U.S., police run rampant over the Constitution of the U.S., on oath they swore to uphold, but when Americans don't know the law, and the cops either don't know or worse, “don't care” -- then I think that's pretty darn “sad”. I think Mr. Fischer held out and fought the good fight, steadfast til the day he died, and may he Rest In Peace.
Educate yourself about U.S./State Laws --
https://www.youtube.com/@AuditTheAudit/videos
After which the troll posted a string of profanities, confirming there was never any genuine sentiment of “compassion” for Mr. Fischer, rather an intent to inflict further defamatory remarks.

This ongoing work is a tribute to the life and accomplishments of Robert “Bobby” Fischer who passionately loved and studied chess history. May his life continue to inspire many other future generations of chess enthusiasts and kibitzers, alike.

Robert J. Fischer, Kid Chess Wizard 1956March 9, 1943 - January 17, 2008

The photograph of Bobby Fischer (above) from the March 02, 1956 The Tampa Times was discovered by Sharon Mooney (Bobby Fischer Newspaper Archive editor) on February 01, 2018 while gathering research materials for this ongoing newspaper archive project. Along with lost games now being translated into Algebraic notation and extractions from over two centuries of newspapers, it is but one of the many lost treasures to be found in the pages of old newspapers since our social media presence was first established November 11, 2017.

Special Thanks