A< Prev Index Next >
This week's “chess” column is filled with more absurdly political Zionist drivel for propaganda, also whose criticisms upon Mrs. Regina Fischer are easily refuted, considering the fact both mother and daughter were college educated. Not “poor” as the sorry idle rumor goes here. The news articles from the 1950s … 1960s … we know better… much more available, including publications about the Fischer family bringing “Honor” to Brooklyn. In short sir, put a sock in it. Your bigoted intolerance and discrimination against single mothers (misogynistic in your nature) are duly noted! Yes yes, you imply, that for a woman to raise a child alone, without the guiding hand of a male is an impossible task … a failure … a crime against a child. Better a mother should stay with an abusive spouse, perhaps. That's how the patriarchy did it in the “good old days”. Correct? Along with the fact we know, that during 1972 the Soviet network in mass media was hard at work to demoralize Bobby Fischer in the press with false stories such as these. Hoping he might resign and rescind the paper crown to the USSR, on a paper platter, fit only for their paper champion.
The REAL Regina Fischer was a brilliant woman who was a very good mother as well... just as the U.S President's wife,...
Posted by Bobby Fischer's True History on Tuesday, October 9, 2018
Smear Campaign (Was: The Chess Column) Sun, May 28, 1972 – 32 · The Sacramento Bee (Sacramento, California) · Newspapers.com
While culling earlier, I came across a chess columnist abusing his reach in media to do the bidding of the USSR and...
Posted by Bobby Fischer's True History on Wednesday, March 3, 2021
Newspapers reveals nothing about such vapid accusations against an “Elliot Forry Laucks” being a “neo nazi” (a thing the Soviet Union was fond of accusing people of without evidence, after all, anyone who dare criticize Soviet policy must be a Fascist, yes?! Or is that yet a lousy idle rumor, a cop out smear campaign? Such as Ralph Ginzburg, who took his smear campaign to Bobby, then his overconfidence enabled him to try it again on a bigger Soviet critic, Barry Goldwater who raised an army of lawyers for Ginzburg's smear campaign that again, came without any factual basis, and likewise had savagely defamed poor Bobby in the press, taking words out of context, failure to produce tape recordings of the more colorful allegations (claimed to Frank Brady he burned them! Imagine that!) from a so-called “interview” which deeply troubled Bobby for years after the traumatizing event. The Soviet paid people like Ginzburg to do just that in the press. The sort of thing written in the above chess column by a detractor of Bobby. But we did find this on record:
Senator Guffey Lambasts Holt For His Attack on S.F. Laucks Wed, Oct 2, 1940 – 1 · York Daily Record (York, Pennsylvania) · Newspapers.com
Senator Guffey Lambasts Holt For His Attack on S.F. Laucks Wed, Oct 2, 1940 – 3 · York Daily Record (York, Pennsylvania) · Newspapers.com
Elliot Forry Laucks inherited somewhere around 2 million dollars from his father. If his (clearly decent, law abiding, upstanding member of society) parent, saw any of the inclinations as accused, why would he leave his son such an inheritance? For what earthly purpose would Laucks have mingling with the ranks of low class rabble “neo nazis”? Surely Soviets would like us to believe such a thing, but the bigger question is how do we know it's not a false story, since no credible documentation was provided to substantiate such accusations? And, if Bobby were ever “Jewish” as your last week's article wrongly suggests in its attempt to malign Bobby with Zionist propaganda, the same false belief that Adolf Hitler spread during his speeches that adherents of Judaism are somehow a “racial group” — then why would Forry Laucks (a “neonazi” as you claim without evidence) befriend young Bobby to take him on a trip to Cuba?! Clearly, Laucks was not prejudiced against Bobby (who was neither religious, nor ever a practitioner of Judaism). The Soviet actually paid people to spread such vapid nonsense! and so easily seen through for what it is with only minimal skepticism.
Son Principal Heir of Laucks Fri, Apr 24, 1942 – Page 1 · The Evening News (Harrisburg, Pennsylvania) · Newspapers.com
Son Principal Heir of Laucks Fri, Apr 24, 1942 – Page 8 · The Evening News (Harrisburg, Pennsylvania) · Newspapers.com
